- Availability: Neither Suse Linux or any BSD variants (FreeBSD,
OpenBSD, NetBSD) provide Mercurial packages as part of their
distributions. Choosing a niece product may not be wise. git,
Subversion and bitkeeper are not only more popular - they are also
much more widespread and better
I am also attaching a screenshot showing how KWord is behaviing
strangely, ie, fonts are shown with a red-colored vertical bar at
the beginning position of each character. (OOps, for some reason
I am not allowed to attach a file.)
Assuming that the screenshot is not too large, you could
It hangs in GRUB's gateA20() subroutine,
How did you figure it out?!?!?!?! I'd love to know the process you used!
By adding debug printfs to the grub source code; I used
console_putchar(char) calls. And building a custom bootable Solaris x86 CD
with the modified boot/grub/stage2_eltorito
Jürgen Keil wrote:
The next try was with more console_putchar calls added to the
gateA20() code. This narrowed it down to the loop waiting for an
empty keyboard controller input buffer.
So how far did you get after that ?
--
Darren J Moffat
___
It seems obvious from a previous thread that the idea of that the idea of
running Solaris on the Mac Intel is a popular idea among the community. I
suggest we encourage Apple to help us make Solaris a reality on Mac Intel
hardware. What we could do is create a petition of names that would not
Thanks for all the information to all of you.
Does anybody know when Solaris will get the latest tcsh? Current is 6.14.0 and
Solaris 10 includes 6.12.0.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi,
Roland Mainz wrote:
serious cycles on this though we'd like to, and the folks who were in
involved in 64K simply don't have any interest in working on this in the open.
Why ? What do they fear ? Being swampedoverburned with too many emails
or what ?
This is a community -- it's up to
The next try was with more console_putchar calls added to the
gateA20() code. This narrowed it down to the loop waiting for an
empty keyboard controller input buffer.
So how far did you get after that ?
Well, it doesn't hang any more after printing Loading stage2 ,
after I added
Juergen Keil wrote:
Or I can wait until the grub menu timeout expires. This starts loading the
default entry. multiboot and the boot_archive is loaded. Text screen is
cleared, , and the system hangs - before printing the
SunOS Release 5.xx copyright string.
A completely wild guess
The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
but not multiple blocks per page.
Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
(But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss
The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
but not multiple blocks per page.
Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
(But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
maybe it is time to update the newfs manpage. For Solaris 10 at least.
--
Or I can wait until the grub menu timeout expires. This starts loading the
default entry. multiboot and the boot_archive is loaded. Text screen is
cleared, , and the system hangs - before printing the
SunOS Release 5.xx copyright string.
A completely wild guess but maybe we
The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
but not multiple blocks per page.
Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
(But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
maybe it is time to update the newfs manpage. For Solaris 10 at least.
The filesystems appear to be prepared to handle multiple pages per block
but not multiple blocks per page.
Hence no 4K blocksize on UltraSPARC.
(But even 4K pages with 8K blocks didn't work right on x86, at least)
maybe it is time to update the newfs manpage. For Solaris 10 at least.
In
Juergen Keil wrote:
Or I can wait until the grub menu timeout expires. This starts loading the
default entry. multiboot and the boot_archive is loaded. Text screen is
cleared, , and the system hangs - before printing the
SunOS Release 5.xx copyright string.
A completely wild guess but
Dennis Clarke schrieb:
In what sense? It already says the sun4u architecture doesn't
support the 4K blocksize.
It simply seems odd to refer to the 4K page size for the non-sun4u hardware
when Solaris 10 does not support sun4m or sun4d etc etc. Simply leave the
manpage with an 8K page size
Hi All,
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely interested in
discoverying/learning more about the internals of Solaris.
thanks,
peter
17 matches
Mail list logo
