I'll sign it :)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Trying to start samba in a zone and failing,
What to look for or do next !! ?? .
Some guidance needed -- Thanks
-- Nil
==
bash-3.00# svcadm restart samba
===
bash-3.00# svcs
Nilotpal Bhattacharyya wrote:
Trying to start samba in a zone and failing,
What to look for or do next !! ?? .
Some guidance needed -- Thanks
-- Nil
==
bash-3.00# svcadm restart samba
I have a problem with my network.
I'll paste below :
**
# host google.com
google.com has address 64.233.167.99
# ping 64.233.167.99
64.233.167.99 is alive
# ping google.com
ping: unknown host google.com
Thanks for all the information to all of you.
Does anybody know when Solaris will get the latest
tcsh? Current is 6.14.0 and Solaris 10 includes
6.12.0.
No, but why would that be important?
One of the major differences you might have noticed between Linux and
(Open)Solaris communities is
On 4/11/06, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the information to all of you.
Does anybody know when Solaris will get the latest
tcsh? Current is 6.14.0 and Solaris 10 includes
6.12.0.
No, but why would that be important?
One of the major differences you might have
what does in say in /var/svc/log/*samba* ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
===
bash-3.00# ls -al *samba*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 134 Apr 6 08:40 network-samba:default.log
HERE IS THE LOG
The log files
bash-3.00# cat network-samba\:default.log
[
Vincenzo Sciarra wrote:
I have a problem with my network.
I'll paste below :
**
# host google.com
google.com has address 64.233.167.99
# ping 64.233.167.99
64.233.167.99 is alive
# ping google.com
ping:
In response to the e-mail I received
I tried to enable it again, here it is again --
Yes, the files in question are in /etc/sfw/smb.conf
==
bash-3.00# svcadm enable samba
bash-3.00# svcs -l samba
fmri svc:/network/samba:default
name
This is an important question to me. I have been using UNIX in some flavour
and on various systems since about 1984 and am more than able to throw my
oversized ego over the wall in the hopes of education and instruction.
I have recently run into a situation where I am unclear on what to do. I
Dennis Clarke writes:
SunOS/BSD Compatibility Package Commands vipw(1B)
^^^
That's a key phrase there. It doesn't say museum artifact, but it
could.
SYNOPSIS
/usr/ucb/vipw
[...]
This system is a Solaris Neveda build 35 system complete with
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I recently adopted a style of doing things that may be Linux like and
thus a bad thing in the strict UNIX world. I began to put my root user in a
home directory of /root along with all of the dot files that get created for
PSARC 2003/039 Alternate home directory for root
On 4/11/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Do we need vipw to safely edit the /etc/passwd file ?
YES!!! absolutely, people make mistakes, and no one wants to go down
to the datacenter or even the basement, and boot the system with an
emergency disk or install disk to fix
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I recently adopted a style of doing things that may be Linux like and
thus a bad thing in the strict UNIX world. I began to put my root user in
a
home directory of /root along with all of the dot files that get created
for
PSARC 2003/039 Alternate home directory for
On 04/11/06 15:25, James Dickens wrote:
On 4/11/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Do we need vipw to safely edit the /etc/passwd file ?
YES!!! absolutely, people make mistakes, and no one wants to go down
to the datacenter or even the basement, and boot the system with an
Peter Buckingham wrote:
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely interested in
discoverying/learning more about the internals of Solaris.
It has been discussed, but there
On 4/11/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Do we need vipw to safely edit the /etc/passwd file ?
YES!!! absolutely, people make mistakes, and no one wants to go down
to the datacenter or even the basement, and boot the system with an
emergency disk or install disk to
Dennis Clarke wrote:
It says State : Closed, fixed and thus must be in a patch somewhere for
Solaris 10 GA ? Or strictly solaris_nevada(snv_36) ? Probably a patch on
the way.
Don't know if it is being backported or not. Closed, fixed doesn't
imply that there is a backported fix.
--
On 04/11/06 15:25, James Dickens wrote:
On 4/11/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Do we need vipw to safely edit the /etc/passwd file ?
YES!!! absolutely, people make mistakes, and no one wants to go down
to the datacenter or even the basement, and boot the system with
Dennis Clarke wrote:
It says State : Closed, fixed and thus must be in a patch somewhere for
Solaris 10 GA ? Or strictly solaris_nevada(snv_36) ? Probably a patch
on
the way.
Don't know if it is being backported or not. Closed, fixed doesn't
imply that there is a backported fix.
Ah
===The error like this
smbldap_open_connection: Secure connection not supported by LDAP client
libraries!
Connection to LDAP server failed for the 1 try!
smbldap_open_connection: Secure connection not supported by LDAP client
libraries!
==
Was taken care of by
Or I can wait until the grub menu timeout expires. This starts loading the
default entry. multiboot and the boot_archive is loaded. Text screen is
cleared, , and the system hangs - before printing the
SunOS Release 5.xx copyright string.
A completely wild guess but maybe we got
If this is similiar to a different platform I worked on you might want
to try removing the i8042 driver... just a wild guess.
It was hanging in multiboot, kb_init(), which expects that x86 hardware
using the standard console must have a working ps/2 keyboard controller.
It seems the i8042
Jürgen Keil wrote:
any I'm able to boot in Intel iMac into a snv_34 failsafe kernel boot
archive !
YEAH!
Quick questions since I haven't had time to setup the environment to
play with your patches yet. Did you see any disks, or can't you type
anything yet ? The reason I ask is
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Eric Lowe wrote:
Peter Buckingham wrote:
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely interested in
discoverying/learning more about the internals of
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote:
snip .
any I'm able to boot in Intel iMac into a snv_34 failsafe kernel boot
archive !
Nice Work JK!! :)
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone:
Nilotpal Bhattacharyya writes:
Well, I take it all back , as it stands now .
I had to do a
svcadm restart samba
and than
svcadm refresh samba
Glad it's working.
-- Close the Thread .
In order for things to get better, we need bugs
Jürgen Keil wrote:
Quick questions since I haven't had time to setup the environment to
play with your patches yet. Did you see any disks,
Yes, I see both the optical device and the s-ata hdd, both on
pci-ide controllers:
I noticed that in the prtconf output you sent in the next message,
Al Hopper wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Eric Lowe wrote:
Peter Buckingham wrote:
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely interested in
discoverying/learning more about the
Stability and compatibility doesn't necessary imply
outdated software. In fact
nowadays running oldish software gives nothing by
unattractive look. And
that is what spookes many potential users.
I disagree. Having latest-and-greatest, if it comes from the Linux camp, does
not mean quality.
On Apr 11, 2006, at 7:20 PM, Eric Lowe wrote:
Al Hopper wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Eric Lowe wrote:
Peter Buckingham wrote:
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely
Understandably, latest and greatest may not always be the *best* option.
There is a lot to be said for stability/status quo.
However, you need to look at both ends of the spectrum. Here in the State
of Hawaii, I am a data processing systems analyst in order to help fund
the startup of my data
OK, I've updated the table at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/oss_bite_size/ . Some notes:
* This page only contains oss-bite-size bugs that might be available
for the community to work on: there is a link to the fixed
oss-bite-size bugs.
* I was planning to use the
Jürgen Keil wrote:
Hmm, well, I've not yet tried installing Solaris x86 on this Intel Mac, so I'm
not 100%
it will corrupt the HDD. Most likely the HDD will end up beeing corrupted,
I'd say.
Does the Solaris installer know how to install to EFI partitioned HDDs? I
don't think so...
Al Hopper wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Eric Lowe wrote:
Peter Buckingham wrote:
There was some discussion about having a more technical mailing
list/community ala freebsd hackers/lkml/...
Was there any progress made on that? I'm definitely interested in
discoverying/learning more about
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 02:43:47PM -0700, Karyn Ritter wrote:
OK, I've updated the table at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/oss_bite_size/ . Some notes:
It doesn't seem useful to me to split out Accepted bugs. The accepted state
doesn't really mean very much at all (I've even seen
I'd like to propose a project similar to SFW Nevada for
the forthcoming opening of the collection previously
known as the Solaris Software Companion. This body
of software consists of Free and Open Source software
not supported by Sun; it installs into /opt/sfw and is
delivered with Solaris 10
Keith M. Wesolowski writes:
I'd like to propose a project similar to SFW Nevada for
the forthcoming opening of the collection previously
known as the Solaris Software Companion. This body
of software consists of Free and Open Source software
not supported by Sun; it installs into /opt/sfw
Stability and compatibility doesn't necessary imply
outdated software. In fact
nowadays running oldish software gives nothing by
unattractive look. And
that is what spookes many potential users.
I disagree. Having latest-and-greatest, if it comes from the Linux camp, does
not mean
re :
Keith M. Wesolowski wrote:
I'd like to propose a project similar to SFW Nevada for
the forthcoming opening of the collection previously
known as the Solaris Software Companion. This body
of software consists of Free and Open Source software
not supported by Sun; it installs into
I think a better idea might be to create something like Blastwave but for
Solaris 10 Sparc and x86, where we can just install software into /opt/sfw
using pkg-get or something similar. It'll be far more useful than a
co-bundled product, which gets too stale to be useful over time.
see :
42 matches
Mail list logo
