Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, and the XATTR API seems to be incompatible to the POSIX shell.
Wonderfull... ;-(
Let me give a short answer in advance:
If you are able to prove that the Sun XATTE interface
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Dick Davies wrote:
On 09/05/06, Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 May 2006, Andrew Watkins wrote:
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our /var/mail on
another system, just in case the system went down.
There's a distributed filesystem
it's not completely clear to me how this filesystem
is used and how you are planning to manage your
alternate service, so the following may or may not be
useful...
I will clear up exactly what I was hoping for. Want I wanted is to mirror
2 disks on 2 different machines, so that both disks
I don't mean to be a pain, but I can *barely*
understand what is
written below.
That is so because the original text has not been written by a human being, but
rather by some sort of a sophisticated spam-phishing tool.
Unfortunately, whoever is using this tool is clearly out of their
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our
/var/mail on another system, just in case the system
went down. He suggested that Windows has DFS
(Distributed File System) and I said I would look
into it.
Over the weekend I thought of CacheFS which comes
will solaris which allows you
Moazam Raja writes:
I don't mean to be a pain, but I can *barely* understand what is
written below.
It's not quite clear, but I think the answer is someone (actually
anyone) can file a bug/RFE using the existing tools on
opensolaris.org, and then someone with a contributor agreement can
Roland Mainz wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Holger Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think runat(1) is a good debug/development tool. I don't believe that
it is useful for building applications on top of, if you need to build
apps then use openat(2) and friends not shell scripting.
Please
Big YES !!! (but with reservation...)
If a shared storage solution is practical to implement it's the best bet.
Sounds like what you have in mind is building (a subset of) a campus cluster.
Definitely the most general, robust, and elegant solution to the problem.
However, it sounded to me
When you folks say that various item are broken or not implemented, are we
talkin' strictly about the open version of sol 10 or the official version as
well ? If these limit apply to both, is there a better release to use on this
particular machine for now?
[Background: I got this machine
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Steve published a nightly snapshot of the onnv source today (
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current ).
SXCR Build 39 is on schedule to deliver Friday (5/12).
Just out of curiosity, when I see a release like 20060508 only days before
the release of snv_39 am I
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I want to be the first to jump up and say Thank You loudly!
I just went through another nightly/BFU/ACR/reboot cycle and everything
was as smooth as silk. I made some really minor tweaks to lgrpplat.c
such that I could see multiple memory nodes reported on my dual
Opteron
If these limit apply to both, is there a
better release to use on this particular machine for
now?
ZFS is such a great feature, I'd suggest grabbing SX (Solairs Express) and use
ZFS now, or you can wait until June when Solaris 10 update 2 should be out, and
include ZFS. You can't, yet,
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I want to be the first to jump up and say Thank You loudly!
I just went through another nightly/BFU/ACR/reboot cycle and everything
was as smooth as silk. I made some really minor tweaks to lgrpplat.c
such that I could see multiple memory nodes reported on my dual
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I want to be the first to jump up and say Thank You loudly!
I just went through another nightly/BFU/ACR/reboot cycle and everything
was as smooth as silk. I made some really minor tweaks to lgrpplat.c
such that I could see multiple memory nodes
thanx for the input.
just fyi: that was musicAL data (as in musical chairs) not music data.
I'm moving stuff around. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I want to be the first to jump up and say Thank You loudly!
I just went through another nightly/BFU/ACR/reboot cycle and everything
was as smooth as silk. I made some really minor tweaks to lgrpplat.c
such that I could see multiple memory nodes
afterthought:
under side effects i meant to include, but forgot: prospective effects of
your solution on host and network performance. Could be good, bad, or
negligable depending on what you do.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Disclaimer: I'm not an employee of Fujitsu Limited so my observations/opinions
are my own.
The platform support for Fujitsu primepower systems that folks are seeing in
the SX
builds are from S10. The way our internal RE process works is all packages in
the
current GA release roll forward into
If these limit apply to both, is there a
better release to use on this particular machine for
now?
ZFS is such a great feature, I'd suggest grabbing SX
(Solairs Express)
and use ZFS now, or you can wait until June when
Solaris 10 update 2
should be out, and include ZFS. You can't, yet,
Our company is make library software that need sevel ports connection. When
going to solaris 10, they started to use xinetd. After I showed how ease of the
smf, now they are using smf-inetd. but still the xined existed for the port
forwarding.
e.g.
server1 access server
server2 oracle db
We propose the creation of an NTP project on OpenSolaris.ORG, affiliated
with the Nevada and Device Driver communities.
While historially SunOS 4 and Solaris have been platforms of choice for
NTP timekeeping and leading-edge development, Solaris has fallen behind
other platforms (notably FreeBSD)
* Rainer Orth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We propose the creation of an NTP project on OpenSolaris.ORG, affiliated
with the Nevada and Device Driver communities.
Sounds good to me. +1.
Cheers,
--
Glenn Lagasse
KISS/Approachability
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
x21293, 781-442-1293
Rainer Orth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We propose the creation of an NTP project on OpenSolaris.ORG, affiliated
with the Nevada and Device Driver communities.
While historially SunOS 4 and Solaris have been platforms of choice for
NTP timekeeping and leading-edge development, Solaris has
Joerg Schilling writes:
Don't forget the missing support for cheap DCF77 receivers.
This needs driver support (e.g. save kernel hr time triggered on external
status interrupts) and user level support.
Both user level and kernel support are available with the PARSE driver and
STREAMS
YJ Fan wrote:
Our company is make library software that need sevel ports connection. When
going to solaris 10, they started to use xinetd. After I showed how ease of the
smf, now they are using smf-inetd. but still the xined existed for the port
forwarding.
e.g.
server1 access server
server2
Rainer Orth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
Don't forget the missing support for cheap DCF77 receivers.
This needs driver support (e.g. save kernel hr time triggered on external
status interrupts) and user level support.
Both user level and kernel support are
On Sat, 6 May 2006, Martin Schaffstall wrote:
I just had an idea: Would it be useful/feasible to sign all
executabley in Solaris with a cryptographic key and only allow
execution of signed binaries then? Would this help to improve system
security?
Hi Martin -
It may be useful, and in fact we
Rainer Orth wrote:
We propose the creation of an NTP project on OpenSolaris.ORG, affiliated
with the Nevada and Device Driver communities.
Seconded.
- Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
if something rsync-ish looks like the right kind of thing this might be of
interest...
http://www.dirvish.org/
dirvish is a backup utility that does snapshot style backups using rsync. the
documentation page also has links to some useful-looking rsync documentation
and links to sites for
Rainer Orth wrote:
We propose the creation of an NTP project on OpenSolaris.ORG, affiliated
with the Nevada and Device Driver communities.
While historially SunOS 4 and Solaris have been platforms of choice for
NTP timekeeping and leading-edge development, Solaris has fallen behind
other
Thanks to Rob Benson, Yann Poupet, and Juergen Keil for these three
fixes below and to Shudong Zhou, Eric Lowe, Alan Perry for sponsoring
the work through to putback:
Putback 49
ID: 6375097
Desc: x86 ramdisk should always contain xmd64 kernel and binaries
Submitted by Rob Benson on 1/21/06
Sun
I would like to propose the creation of an NFS/RDMA project to
be affiliated with the OpenSolaris NFS community.
The purpose of this project is to update the existing
NFS/RDMA(Infiniband) support in OpenSolaris to match the most recent
Internet Drafts on the topic. It would also undertake
On 5/10/06, Robert Thurlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: Worse case scenario, SUN creates a java based NFS client/server for Windows users - as for the good old business case, why not :-)You're aware that Microsoft themselves offer the free download called
Services For Unix that
On 5/9/06, Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 11:15 pm, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote: I completely agree; this has been the best move SUN has done in its 20 or so odd years of existence, it almost makes up for all the complete whipe-outs past failed take overs have been (Cobalt
-- Forwarded message --From: Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: May 11, 2006 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Request for new forum: embedded-discussTo: Stephen Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED]On 5/10/06,
Stephen Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Duboff writes: On Sunday 07
Please do NOT reply to this address. If you have any problems,
feel free to send email to the alias [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Mozilla 1.7.13 builds for Solaris10, Solaris 8/9 is now available on
mozilla.org
Download Page and Location
==
external:
coming soon(there is some
36 matches
Mail list logo
