Francois Saint-Jacques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Beforing getting in the package management/installation stuff, I think we
> need to solve a big problem here: ON build. The current build process is
> really monolithic and unfriendly for new commers. What is all that
> 'nightly' and 'bldenv' stu
Francois Saint-Jacques wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:35:33AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been thinking
that the best option would be to include templates in
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:35:33AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
> mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been thinking
> that the best option would be to include templates in the installation
> procedure
Stefan Parvu wrote:
ld: fatal: symbol `s44W_info' in file
/export/home/sparvu/ghc/lib/ghc-6.6.1/libHSCabal.a(Utils__90.o): \
> section [1] .text: size 1042: symbol (address 0x400, size 20) lies outside
of containing section
...
Anyone any ideas ? Is this a GNU ld / Sun ld issue ?
The er
hi all,
Im trying to get compiled pugs for Solaris Express build 55b. Pugs is
documented under:
http://www.pugscode.org/
Basically I have downloaded the Haskell compiler and installed temporarily
under my home directory. I see that GHC was not compiled using -R so it
complains when trying to
Thanks. We are currently having some guys at Solaris look into the code
changes but they wanted me to shoot an email out to this community to see how
well it is being monitored.as sort of a test to see if I got the same
response as they would AND my contact at Sun is getting about the same
UNIX admin wrote:
> You like the tab feature of GNOME terminal? It's a shame that GNOME terminal
> is slow and buggy.
>
>
Odd, it appears to be neither on my systems.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alex Bennee wrote:
Hi,
I've never been able to find the correct TERM magic to fix my remote terminal. My
principle box is a Linux one with a gnome-terminal with which I ssh over to my Solaris
box. The default term setting is "xterm" but this seems to have problems with
re-drawing long lines w
> Nope - anti-aliased fonts have been used since the
> GNOME 2.6
> first integrated to Solaris 10 before the initial S10
> release.
>
> --
> -Alan Coopersmith-
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System
> em Engineering
> ___
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Before we got carried away, I want to comment on the fonts of SXCE 65. I
believe this is the first time that anti-alias fonts are used in Solaris.
Nope - anti-aliased fonts have been used since the GNOME 2.6
first integrated to Solaris 10 before the initial S10 release.
Before we got carried away, I want to comment on the fonts of SXCE 65. I
believe this is the first time that anti-alias fonts are used in Solaris. I
pay a lot of attention to screen fonts, and at least in this area, Solaris now
should rank among the best looking operating systems.
Re Blastwav
On 6/5/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
>> It might help if some of the people who are criticising what we have at
>> the moment had actually bothered to look at the thing they are
>> criticising *before* criticising it.
>
> I mean something like this: http://www.
ken mays writes:
> Oh, not bad as this is done by Debian installs. Yet,
> think of the users that don't connect certain
> workstations to the network or have high network
> bandwidth.
Of course, this is also already part of the stated goals of the Caiman
project ...
--
James Carlson, Solaris Net
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ has had links to all of them for
a while.
It still does.
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
Have you actually looked?
ops, i did look, however, i missed the quick downloads table... stupid me
but from
http://www.theregister.com/2007/05/31/sun_project_indiana/comments/
i can see people are still confused (and complaining).
I don't know what the current d
> Is this bad coding etiquette ?
>
> [u]dbdimp.c[/u]
>
> 4459if (!my_login(h, imp_dbh))
> 4460{
> 4461 [b]do_error(h,
> mysql_errno(&imp_dbh->mysql),
> mysql_error(&imp_dbh->mysql)[/b]
> 4462 #if MYSQL_VERSION_ID >= SQL_STATE_VERSION
> 4463 [b],
> mysql_sqlstate(
> /me prepares to read a long man page.
You're doing yourself a favor: by investing the time to assimilate the
technology now, you'll save tons more time being productive down the road.
> I'll look into it but I'd really prefer to work
> within my gnome-terminal with all my other sessions.
> Unf
On 6/5/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
>> What, you mean something like http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ ?
>>
> yes, something like that but more visible and in the front page
> (you now need to go to downloads, and scroll down)
Have you actually l
One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot
and install from a mini cd rom image, that pulls
things from the network. I have been thinking that the
best option would be to include templates in the
installation procedure that could pull down different
packages sets depending on what kind
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 6/5/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I still stand by my suggestion that we need to have a nice reference
> distribution which you can rebuild yourself.
I completely agree. The part that's unclear to me is whether solving
I saw this comment below and thought I would respond:
The reason Blastwave has its own GNOME binary set was
due to historical events. Blastwave was the forerunner
of building newer versions of GNOME for Solaris before
OpenSolaris existed. No other major ISV was doing this
for Sun Solaris on a cons
Simon Phipps writes:
> In which case may I suggest you need to be clearer when you are
> speaking on behalf of the OGB or in some other manner of assumed
> authority and when you are just expressing a personal opinion? I'm
> atypical I know, but I had the distinct impression you were seeking
Brian Gupta wrote:
It might help if some of the people who are criticising what we have at
the moment had actually bothered to look at the thing they are
criticising *before* criticising it.
I mean something like this: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/
Please don't hold the Mozilla site
/me prepares to read a long man page.
I'll look into it but I'd really prefer to work within my gnome-terminal with
all my other sessions. Unfortunately the winsize magic doesn't unbreak the odd
behavior.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
On 6/5/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Gupta wrote:
> As I understand there are links on the homepage?? Speaking of homepage,
I
> would suggest that once we have a working distro that we have a splash
page
> that says "Get OpenSolaris" and "Develop OpenSolaris". The get
OpenS
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
What, you mean something like http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ ?
yes, something like that but more visible and in the front page
(you now need to go to downloads, and scroll down)
Have you actually looked?
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
Brian Gupta wrote:
As I understand there are links on the homepage?? Speaking of homepage, I
would suggest that once we have a working distro that we have a splash page
that says "Get OpenSolaris" and "Develop OpenSolaris". The get OpenSolaris
would feature the ref build, but also provide links
On 6/5/07, Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> would it be possible to have links to the rest of the distributions at
> osol.org?
> that would at least solve ONE problem easily
What, you mean something like http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ ?
yes, somet
On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
>mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been
thinking
>that the best option would be to include templates in the installation
>procedure tha
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
would it be possible to have links to the rest of the distributions at
osol.org?
that would at least solve ONE problem easily
What, you mean something like http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/ ?
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
As I understand there are links on the homepage?? Speaking of homepage, I
would suggest that once we have a working distro that we have a splash page
that says "Get OpenSolaris" and "Develop OpenSolaris". The get OpenSolaris
would feature the ref build, but also provide links and descriptions of t
On 6/5/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I still stand by my suggestion that we need to have a nice reference
> distribution which you can rebuild yourself.
I completely agree. The part that's unclear to me is whether solving
the "I can't find downloads at
The thought is that things that are part of the OpenSolaris code base would
definately be hosts by OpenSolaris.org. Being that all the code hosted by
OpenSolaris is freely distributable, it would obviously make sense to
develop and leverage mirror sites.
One thing that will also be hosted is repo
Brian Gupta writes:
> One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
> mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been thinking
> that the best option would be to include templates in the installation
> procedure that could pull down different packages
>One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
>mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been thinking
>that the best option would be to include templates in the installation
>procedure that could pull down different packages sets depending on what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I still stand by my suggestion that we need to have a nice reference
> distribution which you can rebuild yourself.
I completely agree. The part that's unclear to me is whether solving
the "I can't find downloads at opensolaris.org" is any part of that
problem.
--
Ja
One of the goals of Indiana is also to be able to boot and install from a
mini cd rom image, that pulls things from the network. I have been thinking
that the best option would be to include templates in the installation
procedure that could pull down different packages sets depending on what
kind
> > But the question of multimedia codecs has already
> > been answered, and the answer isn't the command
> line
> > interface. The real answer is "include by default
> > all the desirable codecs you can, and then make it
> > easy to install any leftovers from your app
> > installation GUI". That
Is this bad coding etiquette ?
[u]dbdimp.c[/u]
4459if (!my_login(h, imp_dbh))
4460{
4461 [b]do_error(h, mysql_errno(&imp_dbh->mysql),
mysql_error(&imp_dbh->mysql)[/b]
4462 #if MYSQL_VERSION_ID >= SQL_STATE_VERSION
4463 [b], mysql_sqlstate(&imp_dbh->mysql));[
"dbdimp.c", line 3429: prototype mismatch: 3 args passed, 4 expected"
Right there it tells you: the "expert" is calling a function in his code and
passing in three args, while the function expects four.
Lovely.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
>Robert Lunnon writes:
>> The Reference Platform would then be defined as one that emulates this
>> as closely as possible without adding extra features that could
>> inadvertently differentiate the reference plaqtform from a given distro.
>
>That's possibly doable, but I think it also runs dire
Just take a simple xterm and do the following:
stty erase ^V^H
TERM=vt100; export TERM
eval `/usr/openwin/bin/resize`
and read the man page on `xterm`, that's important. That way, you'll be able to
set it up to your liking, to be real nice and comfortable.
This message posted from opensolari
On 05/06/07, girish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian,
I feel that telling people that this is an opensolaris forum so take your
Solaris questions elsewhere is not helping the cause of either opensolaris or
solaris.
It may not be friendly, but it is offtopic and people need a gentle
reminder. I
2007/6/5, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Robert Lunnon writes:
> The Reference Platform would then be defined as one that emulates this
> as closely as possible without adding extra features that could
> inadvertently differentiate the reference plaqtform from a given distro.
That's possibl
Robert Lunnon writes:
> The Reference Platform would then be defined as one that emulates this
> as closely as possible without adding extra features that could
> inadvertently differentiate the reference plaqtform from a given distro.
That's possibly doable, but I think it also runs directly in
Hi,
I've never been able to find the correct TERM magic to fix my remote terminal.
My principle box is a Linux one with a gnome-terminal with which I ssh over to
my Solaris box. The default term setting is "xterm" but this seems to have
problems with re-drawing long lines when I edit previous c
The next meeting of the Atlanta OpenSolaris User Group will be Tuesday,
June 12, at 7PM at the Sun Office in Alpharetta, GA.
Our speaker will be Jeff Bounds, talking about "Using OpenSolaris and
Solaris Express Developer Edition for Development". Jeff will talk
about some of the tools include
Hello All
I appreciate that this may be off topic but I am only having this issue with
Solaris 10 and quite frankly I appear to becoming to the end of my rope. So in
desperation I am posting this here in the hope that someone can help me.
I have been trying to install DBI::mysql on a Solaris 1
Robert Lunnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect this debate boils down to "What is the base level of
> compatibility that the openSolaris 'Brand' should denote such that
> Applications are portable between the various implementations. I think
> this boils down to:
>
> A. Define a "Reser
Hi,
This question occured to me while catching up with the
YetAnotherDistro/Indiana/OpenSolaris-distro dicsussion:
why use a separate distribution as a delivery vehicle
for a new userland toolset and not instead develop
branded zones within existing distributions?
As far as I can tell the variou
> This thread is awesome. Paperwork Pokemon: I choose
> YOU!
>
> Unless something is terribly broken, the leader of
> the project (Ian?) should be able to have this
> administrative stuff dealt with in a day. A big fuss
> over the creation of a mailing list? Come on!
>
> Go Go Gadget Bureaucra
Assuming you're running CDE (such that the password at login is prompted
for by dtlogin, and the password for screen lock is probably prompted for
by dtsession), I don't think there's a way to do that short of altering the
code for those, which is not publically available (without a hefty fee to
Th
> Fine, let the list fill up with off topic subjects. I was going to
unsubscribe anyway, so I don't really care.
Sorry, I didn't mean to offend.
> let the list fill up with off topic subjects.
The OP probably would have had the same problem even he were using Opensolaris.
This message poste
girish wrote:
> Ian,
>
> I feel that telling people that this is an opensolaris forum so take your
> Solaris questions elsewhere is not helping the cause of either opensolaris or
> solaris.
>
>
Fine, let the list fill up with off topic subjects. I was going to
unsubscribe anyway, so I don't r
> Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:09:38AM +1200, Glynn
> Foster wrote:
> >
> >> So, can we just do it? I have powers to create a
> mail alias to start getting
> >> some plans discussed [1] - should I just go ahead
> and do it? Some web space
> >> would be nice, but not ess
Ian,
I feel that telling people that this is an opensolaris forum so take your
Solaris questions elsewhere is not helping the cause of either opensolaris or
solaris.
Message was edited by:
caligula
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
56 matches
Mail list logo
