Is there document about the design and architecture and interface of oss ?
I believe that will be great help to the community.
Thank you
--Freeman
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
Folks,
The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June 14th). We will be offering the source code
Announcing new direction of Open Source NexentaOS
development:
NexentaCP (Nexenta Core Platform).
[...]
First unstable b65-based ISO with ZFS/Boot-capable
installer available
Nice.
When I install, after keyboard, time etc settings, it waits on Checking for
available disks for +5 minutes.
I back up the idea of releasing OSS (and ZFS while we are at it), into
something that BSD's can import into thier base distribution.
I work a lot with OpenBSD, and I am pretty sure that they will not be looking
to import OSS because of licence restrictions (same as ZFS).
Shame...
This
Вообще странно знать, что Вы не должны менять permissions в OpenSolaris -
открытой системе! ;)
Ещё более непонятно ограничения для суперпользователя! Для чего тогда он нужен?
Если devfs живёт по своим законам, то всёравно должен быть способ этим
управлять, потому что человек глобалнее чем
Вообще странно знать, что Вы не должны менять
permissions в OpenSolaris - открытой системе! ;)
Ещё более непонятно ограничения для
суперпользователя! Для чего тогда он нужен?
Если devfs живёт по своим законам, то всёравно должен
быть способ этим управлять, потому что человек
глобалнее чем
2007/6/8, Семёнов Владимир Викторович [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Вообще странно знать, что Вы не должны менять permissions в OpenSolaris
- открытой системе! ;)
Ещё более непонятно ограничения для суперпользователя! Для чего тогда он
нужен?
Если devfs живёт по своим законам, то всёравно должен быть
Ok! I'mSorry
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Семёнов Владимир Викторович wrote:
Вообще странно знать, что Вы не должны менять permissions в OpenSolaris -
открытой системе! ;)
Ещё более непонятно ограничения для суперпользователя! Для чего тогда он нужен?
Если devfs живёт по своим законам, то всёравно должен быть способ этим
управлять,
What is damageslly if /dev/fd/* will be executable!?
I could wish simply set 777 anyware...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 6/8/07, Семёнов Владимир Викторович [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is damageslly if /dev/fd/* will be executable!?
I could wish simply set 777 anyware...
Frankly speaking it could be easier to run DOS in that case.
The model you wish to implement is native there ...
--
Regards,
Cyril
On Jun 6, 2007, at 9:26 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
We are multiple-booting SX65 with SuSE, WinXP, CentOS, Ubuntu 6.10,
Fedora, RH, as well as with other version(s) of Solaris, never had,
and never expected to have, any problem.
The only exception is with Ubuntu 7.04. In fact, we are also
Hugo Hernandez wrote:
Hello Folks,
we have configured a JumpStart server (boot + install server) for a cluster
running Solaris 10 u06/6 and everything works fine. We would like to create a
second install server for Solaris 10 u11/6 but using the same JumpStart server
(same box).
The problem
writes:
What is damageslly if /dev/fd/* will be executable!?
I could wish simply set 777 anyware...
Why? What exactly are you trying to accomplish? What does having
mode 777 on the
Hello Folks,
we have configured a JumpStart server (boot + install server) for a cluster
running Solaris 10 u06/6 and everything works fine. We would like to create a
second install server for Solaris 10 u11/6 but using the same JumpStart server
(same box).
The problem is we have the
Семёнов Владимир Викторович wrote:
What is damageslly if /dev/fd/* will be executable!?
I could wish simply set 777 anyware...
Nothing, because as soon as the chmod command exits, it will
be reset - /dev/fd/* is not real devices, but the open file
descriptors of the process looking at
Robert,
It means I have to configure the JumpStart server per machine when declaring
the client? For the actual configuration, Solaris 10 u06/6, we added the
clients for all the machines on the subnet of the server in a global way:
[b][b][b]./add_install_client -d -s
Try here:
http://manuals.opensound.com/developer/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hugo Hernandez wrote:
Robert,
It means I have to configure the JumpStart server per machine when declaring
the client? For the actual configuration, Solaris 10 u06/6, we added the clients for
all the machines on the subnet of the server in a global way:
[b][b][b]./add_install_client -d -s
I am on sol10 with snmp v5.0.9.
I have a similar problem with that oid and with 2021.11.59 as well.
In my case, the values are identical to 2021.11.58 and increment by 1 every
day or so. I have not seen them decrement.
snmpget returns different values than snmpwalk.
The net-snmp release
[b]paulgres[/b] I try it's ago as root or as sudo
reason - devfs not accessed (/dev /devices)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Good! I'll could not talk about it this 'cause it's maybe only my strange
personality...
rw-rw-rw- is associated with badly number!
What you think about it?
Ok! Differently I expect any knowledge maybe usability...
RTFM not responds task resolutin...
:) Maybe some tasks interesing somebodys
Why You say that Solaris work with SATA?...
Really I install Belenix in my IDE.
first IDE = has been updated to raid stripping with nForce adapt0 chennel0
first SATA = is raid with nForce adapt1 ch0
sec SATA = is raid with nForce adapt1 ch1
SunOS 5.11 saw only IDE!
If I try kill a raid in the
offtop: with OpenBSD it's possible...
chmod -777 /* - really worked! ;)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Why SATA is working for You? Understandn't
Because Solaris has the drivers to drive the SATA hardware I have - in PATA
emulation mode.
It would seem that it has no drivers, or otherwise doesn't recognize your
hardware and therefore can't see your SATA drives.
What is even more strange, some
rw-rw-rw- is associated with badly number!
What you think about it?
Surely you jest?
This is the 21st century. If there are still people out there that believe that
nonsense, we are very, *VERY* far away from the future as portrayed by
StartTrek NG.
This message posted from
Семёнов Владимир Викторович wrote:
Why You say that Solaris work with SATA?...
Really I install Belenix in my IDE.
first IDE = has been updated to raid stripping with nForce adapt0 chennel0
first SATA = is raid with nForce adapt1 ch0
sec SATA = is raid with nForce adapt1 ch1
SunOS 5.11 saw
writes:
Good! I'll could not talk about it this 'cause it's maybe only my strange
personality...
rw-rw-rw- is associated with badly number!
What you think about it?
It's only the number
You must be missing something..
I just installed it on my MBP using Parallels... Logged in...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zpool list
NAME SIZEUSEDAVAIL CAP HEALTH
ALTROOT
syspool 7.25G 657M 6.61G 8% ONLINE
28 matches
Mail list logo
