Hi,
I want to ask if it is possible to use both net-mgt and serial-mgt together.
When my net-mgt port connected to LAN I can't use Serial-Mgt no console
output is get.
So I have taken out the ethernet cable and it worked so I have decided that
in normal circumstances Serial and Net Management
Hi,brbrI want to ask if it is possible to use
both net-mgt and serial-mgt together. When my net-mgt
port connected to LAN I can't use Serial-Mgt no
console output is get. brSo I have taken out the
ethernet cable and it worked so I have decided that
in normal circumstances Serial and Net
Hello all,
I'm trying to live upgrade from sol10u3 to sol10u4 (i know, i know, i will
install a opensolaris distro soon.. indiana?)...
The /sbin/biosdev seems to be ok for the current boot disc:
0x80 /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci8086,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci8086,[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/pci1077,[EMAIL
UNIX admin writes:
Hi,brbrI want to ask if it is possible to use
both net-mgt and serial-mgt together. When my net-mgt
port connected to LAN I can't use Serial-Mgt no
console output is get. brSo I have taken out the
ethernet cable and it worked so I have decided that
in normal
hey guys,
Am a solaris newbie.I ve installed solaris 11 build 72 on x86 machine.
It doesn't detect my onboard-NIC card, Intel pro/100 VE.
Can anyone help me how to install that. I couldn't find any good info on the
internet about this.
Also, Every time I boot the solaris I receive an error
Hi there,
I upgraded 2 days ago from 72 to 75. In build 72 there was the bug, that a SATA
DVD-Drive wasn't detected by Opensolaris, so after the upgrdae from 70 to 72 I
lost my to drives.
In the bugbase it's said, that this bug is fixed in release 75, but I think, it
still remains. Each time,
I am hoping to organize an informal meeting of people in the Pittsburgh area
interested in OpenSolaris. The intention will be besides the opportunity to
meet with other like minded individuals to also discuss starting a local user
group. If you are interested please respond to this thread or
On 26/10/2007, Alexander Muthmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I upgraded 2 days ago from 72 to 75. In build 72 there was the bug, that a
SATA DVD-Drive wasn't detected by Opensolaris, so after the upgrdae from 70
to 72 I lost my to drives.
In the bugbase it's said, that this bug is
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Why is there no SunRay section here? I just got myself two brand new SunRay 2
which I will setup to my [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1GB RAM. I would like to discuss
SunRay things here, too. Could a section be added? Would be great for us
SunRay noobs.
This message posted
Why is there no SunRay section here? I just got myself two brand new SunRay 2
which I will setup to my [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1GB RAM. I would like to discuss
SunRay things here, too. Could a section be added? Would be great for us SunRay
noobs.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
It seems this discussion is not leading anywhere. And Sun is doing
what Sun is going to do.
So, lead it where you want it to go. Make a proposal!
Don't just sit
On 10/26/07, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want the following distros to coexist:
SolarisNG, OpenSolaris Distro - Indiana
Belenix, OpenSolaris Distro - SolarisNG with KDE (or whatever Moinak
and team want to do)
Nexenta,
Orvar Korvar wrote:
Why is there no SunRay section here? I just got myself two brand new SunRay 2
which I will setup to my [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1GB RAM. I would like to discuss
SunRay things here, too. Could a section be added? Would be great for us
SunRay noobs.
A Virtual Client OpenSolaris
The short answer is, yes, but I'd like to qualify that with a caveat. I use
a SunFire v20z to run web, mail, VPN, smb and other file services, etc. on my
home network. I have 4 Gigs of Ram in this puppy and use a mirrored zfs pool
for the main file system, and 5 500GB drives in a Raid5z pool
Cool, Unfortunately you're in the wrong end of the state for me in NJ. Good
luck.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 10/26/07, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
It seems this discussion is not leading anywhere. And Sun is doing
what Sun is going to do.
So, lead it where
If you're talking about i18n and the sparc dissasembler, I'm sure you
know that these are the process of being replaced.
The Sparc dissassembler work was done by Jason King within the
infrastructure at Blastwave. So that is pretty far outside the Sun
firewalls.
I don't know about the i18n
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/10/2007, Brandorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/26/07, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandorr wrote:
It seems this discussion is not leading anywhere. And Sun is doing
The cold-boot is a thing, I need to do every time, because of a bug in the
nvidia ethernet driver. A change from Developer to Express made no difference
for me, just again a cannot find install software
Thanks a lot
This message posted from opensolaris.org
At the heart of it is the questions, Should the OpenSolaris
brand/trademark refer to a runnable OS?, and If, so, do we limit to
distros that are binary copies of the Indiana distro?
The official discussion is happening on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post you will need to subscribe by sending an email
Hi,
take a look at the following output of iostat -xzn 5:
extended device statistics
r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
119.40.0 11014.20.0 0.0 1.70.0 13.9 0 96 md/d10
59.60.0 5529.40.0 0.0 0.9
Martin Bochnig wrote:
The biggest hindrance to OpenOffice dominance is Sun itself
Written by Steve Lake
10.22.2007 at 08:19am
One of the things that bothers me profusely about OpenOffice is Sun’s
maniacal infatuation with controlling every square inch of OpenOffice,
including all the
Thomas Nau schrieb:
Hi
take a look at the following output of iostat -xzn 5:
extended device statistics
r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
119.40.0 11014.20.0 0.0 1.70.0 13.9 0 96 md/d10
59.60.0 5529.40.0 0.0
Brandorr wrote:
so again I ask you - please make a counter proposal. Be part of
the solution!
Proposal: No distro will be named OpenSolaris.
I updated the wiki to include this
John's proposal, as I understand, is that only people/teams that can
use the OpenSolaris trademark as a
Brandorr wrote:
A compatibility test, that says, verify that this is the same exact
set of bits is an audit, not a compatibility test. You are defining
compatibility in such a way that only the thing being tested against
As the one who wrote those words, along with an email stating that:
What
25 matches
Mail list logo
