there's no SXDE, a while, was replaced by opensolaris 2008.05
(search the forums)
opensolaris 2008.05 is only x86 and doesn't have the same setup
SXCE is approx the same
SXCE is not the same. SXDE is a much more thoroughly tested release than this
every-two-week SXCE which may contain
there's no SXDE, a while, was replaced by
opensolaris 2008.05
(search the forums)
opensolaris 2008.05 is only x86 and doesn't have the
same setup
SXCE is approx the same
SXCE is not the same. SXDE is a much more thoroughly
tested release than this every-two-week SXCE which
may
* andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I read on a previous post somewhere that the
menu-driven version of
Live Update - i.e. the lu command - doesn't wokr
with ZFS due to a
particular bug, but I can't locate the original
post. Doesanyone have
a link to the bug in bugs.opensolaris.org .
I want to increase priority of some of the threads in my application on Solaris
10. For this, I'm calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want to
increase the priority.
priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is fails with EPERM Not owner
error.
According to
Hi,
uname -a
SunOS ns1a 5.11 snv_94 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
sol-nv-B94-sparc-dvd.iso
The upgrade I tried was called osol-0811-95.iso but that would not allow to
do anything.
# df
/ (/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 ):50209260 blocks 3689703 files
/devices (/devices
Hi Ganesh,
Out of curiousity, what happens if you run the program as root?
max
Ganesh wrote:
I want to increase priority of some of the threads in my application on
Solaris 10. For this, I'm calling priocntl from the same thread of which I
want to increase the priority.
Ganesh stated:
I want to increase priority of some of the threads in my application on
Solaris 10. For this, I'm calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want
to increase the priority.
priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is fails with EPERM Not
owner error.
According to
Hi,
What does truss show?
max
Borse, Ganesh wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't have root access on this server not any other
servers, due to organization policy.
But, I guess, with root this problem may not occur.
One thing noticed is that, if I don't give TS_KY_UPRILIM,upriolmt,
arguments
Marc wrote:
Hi,
uname -a
SunOS ns1a 5.11 snv_94 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
sol-nv-B94-sparc-dvd.iso
The upgrade I tried was called osol-0811-95.iso but that would not allow to
do anything.
That looks suspiciously lice an OpenSolaris distro CD, not an SXCE one.
If so, it
Ganesh stated:
I want to increase priority of some of the threads
in my application on Solaris 10. For this, I'm
calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want
to increase the priority.
priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is
fails with EPERM Not owner error.
Ganesh stated:
Ganesh stated:
I want to increase priority of some of the threads
in my application on Solaris 10. For this, I'm
calling priocntl from the same thread of which I want
to increase the priority.
priocntl(priocntl(P_LWPID,P_MYID,PC_SETXPARMS) is
fails with EPERM
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:20:26AM -0700, Ganesh wrote:
Ganesh stated:
I want to increase priority of some of the threads
.
.
The same man page describes whats required.
ean.
How do verify whether my user id has the privilege to assert
PRIV_PROC_PRIOCNTL or
Hi,
Trying to find that but meanwhile is this correct?
copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums md5sums_95.txt osol-0811-95a.iso
or
copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums_95.txt osol-0811-95a.iso
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Trying to find that but meanwhile is this correct?
copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums md5sums_95.txt osol-0811-95a.iso
or
copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums_95.txt
I came here to ask the same question. I installed the original SDXE and used
live upgrade to move to SDXE 2008.01. It was presented to us that this version
would be produced every 3 months. There should have been two more SDXE by now.
As far as I can tell, there is no upgrade path from SDXE
Hi,
Everything we do are on sun systems. (Sparc) Generally V240's and V440's
The only thing I do with a windows box is burn cds/dvds
and download files which then get transfered to a sun box
After burning the image there are many files on the dvd.
The -94 works fine and that has many files as
Greetings,
The next Nexenta hackathon session is scheduled for Aug 31st Midnight
(US/Pacific)
The work will be coordinated on #nexenta IRC at freenode.net. You can
also join us via the web interface at http://www.nexenta.org/chat.
It's about time to merge with the Ubuntu LTS and migrate the
How does priocntl differ from pthread_setschedparam? Do they have same effect?
When I use pthread_getschedparam, I get scheduling policy as OTHER default
priority of the thread as 0 (with max prioirty allowed on scheduling policy of
OTHER as 20).
How does these values correspond with Time
Hi,
We were looking at the beadm and last night ran some nightly thing.
After reading the notes on that Faster piece it seemed like a bad idea.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Loeng Ong writes:
I don't think I use Open Solaris ...
... though that's what this mailing list is about. I suggest
contacting Sun's support group for help with Solaris 10.
but the error log looks similar to the one defined in Bug ID:2137350.
That's actually CR 6376800.
SunOS msy 5.10
PG writes:
SXCE is approx the same
SXCE is not the same. SXDE is a much more thoroughly tested release than this
every-two-week SXCE which may contain serious instabilities and issues, or
may not work at all.
That's not quite true.
SXCE goes through a standard set of testing before
Bob Palowoda writes:
Rather strange. When I do a man on lu the SEE ALSO section doesn't seem to
be high lighted.
A bug in man perhaps?
I don't think he meant that the text is somehow visibly different in
that section. Instead, he meant that the section highlights or
centers one's
Anne Moore writes:
My two nics are setup for Standby in a group. They keep failover over to
each other, causing us massive down time.
I'd suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a more likely place
to look for help. opensolaris-discuss is a general-interest list,
and as such has a *lot* of traffic.
Hi,
I think it is obvious with all the sub-versions that ego's get in the way and
more separations appear in the form of versions. Then it creates a situation
where it gets spread thin in these different areas / versions /
ego_my_name_on_something.
What does it create? Confusion!At least with
zimbra is an exchange replacement that we use at my company. it's pretty
powerful, and runs on a wide variety of unix-like operating systems (even mac
os x) - but not solaris.
i thought i'd drop a line here to see if anyone might be willing to vote for
zimbra to add solaris support (bugzilla
I did a re-install of an SCXE machine to get it onto a zfs root and I've
run into a problem. This time round I did an End-User install instead of
Entire Distribution and it has left out installing a lot of things.
The box is used to run mongrel server for Ruby on Rails websites. I
have so far
probably SUNWhea
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Matt Harrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a re-install of an SCXE machine to get it onto a zfs root and I've
run into a problem. This time round I did an End-User install instead of
Entire Distribution and it has left out installing a lot of
Andras Barna wrote:
probably SUNWhea
excellent, that solved it,
Thanks
Matt
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I realize that this may not be the correct forum ... but will press on
regardless.
I am looking for help to provide a cli php for a small network of computers.
Right now we have a static build of php separate from our coolstack cgi php.
However, I would prefer to just use the coolstack
I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line
wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2
weeks and haven't found any solution.
If I type a command that exceeds 65 characters (including the shell
prompt), it causes the line to wrap to the
Matt Harrison wrote:
I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line
wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2
weeks and haven't found any solution.
If I type a command that exceeds 65 characters (including the shell
prompt), it causes the
Shawn Walker wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line
wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2
weeks and haven't found any solution.
If I type a command that exceeds 65 characters (including the shell
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Matt Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line
wrapping problem that is driving me mad. I googled about this for 2
weeks and haven't found any solution.
John wrote:
I came here to ask the same question. I installed the original SDXE and used
live upgrade to move to SDXE 2008.01. It was presented to us that this
version would be produced every 3 months. There should have been two more
SDXE by now.
As far as I can tell, there is no
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Trying to find that but meanwhile is this correct?
copy/b osol-0811-95.iso + md5sums md5sums_95.txt osol-0811-95a.iso
or
copy/b osol-0811-95.iso
Try resizing your window after connecting.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Brent Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Matt Harrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Matt Harrison wrote:
I connect to my SXCE box regularly over ssh and I've got a bash line
wrapping problem that is driving me mad.
37 matches
Mail list logo
