Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

Hi, Robert Milkowski wrote: > But I wonder - since Fishworks is being distributed by Sun where is > all the source code available for all the changes to CDDL covered > software? Except for the code which has already been integrated into > ON. > The fishworks ON gate (they have others for the ap

Re: [osol-discuss] osol-0906-106a available

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> osol-0906, based on build 106a, is available on genunix.org. >> > > hi there .. ummm .. where is that baby hiding ? > > I don't see it here : > > http://www.genunix.org/distributions/indiana/ > > Dennis It is right at the bottom: [ ]

Re: [osol-discuss] osol-0906-106a available

> osol-0906, based on build 106a, is available on genunix.org. > hi there .. ummm .. where is that baby hiding ? I don't see it here : http://www.genunix.org/distributions/indiana/ Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@ope

[osol-discuss] [Fwd: [osol-announce] OpenSolaris Constitution 2.0 RC1]

fyi ... Original Message Subject:[osol-announce] OpenSolaris Constitution 2.0 RC1 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:03:32 +0900 From: Jim Grisanzio To: opensolaris-annou...@opensolaris.org The OGB has been working on simplifying and reorganizing the structure of the Op

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

Sun owns the CDDL code you're talking about. They do not have the obligation to distribute the code even if it changes the CDDL's code they own On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello Brian, > > Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 4:34:22 PM, you wrote: > > BU> So, Evan Powell th

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

Hello Brian, Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 4:34:22 PM, you wrote: BU> So, Evan Powell thinks that the CDDL says that all modifications must BU> be contributed back to the original source of covered software. I BU> would like someone to point to me where it says that. It does say that BU> modific

[osol-discuss] Build error (dmake: Warning: Target `all.targ' not remade because of errors)

Hi, While trying to build the latest src of opensolaris with Studio 12, I hit following errors. Any idea what I did wrong. Thanks! /export/home/bl/Desktop/usr/src/tools/proto/opt/onbld/bin/i386/ctfconvert -i -L VERSION debug32/modhash.o dmake: Warning: Target `all.targ' not remade because of er

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat and mod_jk

Shweta Parakh -X (shparakh - Infosys at Cisco) wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build mod_jk for Apache 2.2.11 and Tomcat 4.1.39 on > Solaris10 Sparc machine. > This isn't the place to ask, try one of Sun's Solaris forums or have a look at http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/amp/index.html. --

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

Anil Gulecha wrote: > Greg: have you seen the response at > http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_mojo&Itemid=153&p=7 > Nope, that was what I was hoping for. If there's an issue, bring it out in the open and get both sides input on it. Thanks for the link Anil! Regards, Greg _

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > If the DRM code had the CDDL license applied in ON, that was an > engineering error, not a policy decision - ON code imported from > other projects should maintain the upstream license. > > (There's plenty of bad decisions about the way ou

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

Martin Bochnig wrote: > It is not only "uncool" morally. By having put Sun's private Mesa DRM > port under the CDDL, and at the same time by not having pushed the > code upstream into the official DRM git repo, Sun is basically harming > nobody else than itself. If the DRM code had the CDDL licen

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

It is not only "uncool" morally. By having put Sun's private Mesa DRM port under the CDDL, and at the same time by not having pushed the code upstream into the official DRM git repo, Sun is basically harming nobody else than itself. Because that way the official DRM gate keepers now do not only not

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

So, Evan Powell thinks that the CDDL says that all modifications must be contributed back to the original source of covered software. I would like someone to point to me where it says that. It does say that modifications of covered software must be made available in source code format, but I do

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Greg Palmer wrote: > >> > http://www.nexenta.com/blog >> > >> > >> The quote below is rather interesting, though it would have been nice if >> he included the specifics of his charge rather than just indulging in a >> bit of drive by corpor

Re: [osol-discuss] Nexenta's CEO blogging about 2009, OpenStorage, GPL, CDDL, etc

Greg Palmer wrote: > I think my original response might have been confusing. It appears to > me that you are replying to the quote from the Nexenta's CEO. This quote > is the second paragraph in my message. My input is the first paragraph > you quoted above. I think we are pretty much saying

[osol-discuss] Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat and mod_jk

Hi, I am trying to build mod_jk for Apache 2.2.11 and Tomcat 4.1.39 on Solaris10 Sparc machine. 1. Downloaded mod_jk (version 1.2.27) source from http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi