I totally agree. Selling out to IBM is a huge mistake on soo many levels. I
encourage people to sign my petition ASAP and pass along the link to fellow
supporters of help keeping Sun independent:
http://www.petitiononline.com/smi09/petition.html
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Why does SUN even need to be purchased by another company when they supposedly
"have so much cash laying around" (which is what everyone says anyway)?
Why would Sun buy MySQL for $2 billion only to have IBM buy all of SUN for $6
billion? It makes no sense I would have rather had SUN not buy
The part that bothers me the most was where he said:
"I think the stuff on Solaris and SPARC is likely to see EOLs over time
through the IBM acquisition. "
WE CAN'T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN!!!
Where's Scott McNealy and his golf clubs when you need him? Maybe he can pummel
some sense into the rest
It's too bad that IBM is going to buy SUN. There's a slim chance that FTC will
stop it but unlikely. If only SUN went to another company who would build on
their technologies, not kill it.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-dis
This is an interview with the CEO of Intel:
http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/50863/95013409005968/f51917a3exv99w2.htm
If you scroll down to the bottom of page 17 and beginning of page 18, he says:
"I can tell you that Sun was shopped around the valley and around the world in
the la
On 4/2/2009 9:54 PM, Henry Pepper wrote:
Hi
Thanks for you input.
Both systems had domainname unset.
I tried to set domain name to the same on both systems. That did not
seem to help.
Hi, I gave it a quick try, but didn't reproduce the problem.
# uname -a
SunOS minipit1-2 5.11 snv_110 i8
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:35 AM, roland wrote:
> maybe there is a 64 version of bonnie around?
>
> anyway - do we really need 64bit fs benchmarking tool? wouldn`t 32bit be ok
> for that?
I want a 128bit version, no, 256 ...
___
opensolaris-discuss m
maybe there is a 64 version of bonnie around?
anyway - do we really need 64bit fs benchmarking tool? wouldn`t 32bit be ok for
that?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
exact day (next Monday) when
it is believed to make "big bang":
http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20090403/ibm-mulling-sun-resource-action/?reflink=ATD_yahoo_ticker
"""And after the deal, then what? Massive layoffs, most likely.
Analysts say redundancies between the two c
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Andrius wrote:
How to copy DVDs in OpenSolaris?
Depends on what kind of DVDs you like to copy.
For a data DVD, call:
readcd f=dvd.out
cdrecord -v dvd.out
Jörg
Commercial movie DVD.
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
--On April 3, 2009 11:52:34 AM +0200 Alexander Vlasov
wrote:
Basically, U20 is supported and should work fine -- and it does, we have
lots of them.
You should probably boot solaris with -kdv flags and take a look at kmdb
output
Thanks. That's good to hear and what I thought should be the cas
alexander.vla...@sun.comthis report relates to a message you sent with the
following header fields:
Message - ID: 134798245
From: alexander.vla...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Updating 11/2008 to build 110 ends up at
'opensolaris console login' prompt
Your message cannot be delivered to
--On April 3, 2009 9:16:35 AM -0400 James Carlson
wrote:
Yes. At boot time, edit the grub entry (with 'e'), select the kernel
entry, and edit (again, 'e') to add "-m milestone=none" (for instance).
Thanks very much for letting me know. I will try this next time it fails.
Since I need the c
Andrius wrote:
> > Depends on what kind of DVDs you like to copy.
> >
> > For a data DVD, call:
> >
> > readcd f=dvd.out
> > cdrecord -v dvd.out
> Sorry, forget to add - commercial movie DVD.
Then it is a bit more complex.
- First read the original DVD using dvdbackup.
- Make
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Andrius wrote:
How to copy DVDs in OpenSolaris?
Depends on what kind of DVDs you like to copy.
For a data DVD, call:
readcd f=dvd.out
cdrecord -v dvd.out
Jörg
Sorry, forget to add - commercial movie DVD.
By the way, what is better for audio CD recording
> # cdrw -i
I never tried that ... I'll have to give it a spin sometime, just to see
what it does.
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
# cdrw -i
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Andrius wrote:
> How to copy DVDs in OpenSolaris?
Depends on what kind of DVDs you like to copy.
For a data DVD, call:
readcd f=dvd.out
cdrecord -v dvd.out
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
Andrius wrote:
How to copy DVDs in OpenSolaris?
http://www.sunfreepacks.com/listing/?limit=10&offset=20
Your looking for dvdbackup-0.1.1.
Project is at http://dvd-create.sourceforge.net/
Paul
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-disc
> How to copy DVDs in OpenSolaris?
You need cdrtools from Jorg Schilling.
Do a readcd -v -dev=0,0,0 meshpoints=10 f=output.iso
then do a cdrecord -v -dev=0,0,0 -driveropts=burnfree -dao output.iso
works every time.
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss m
How to copy DVDs in OpenSolaris?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It was the 4 th April 2005 when moves to set up The Free Software Community
were made by Sun.It would be a great idea to celebrate this by a desktop theme.
I spotted a great graphics design and wondered if anyone would like to help
start a project.
Please go to this page and read the discussion
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
>
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Alexander Vlasov wrote:
>>> Fine, we probably have two bugs here:
>>>
>>> 1. svcs hasn't noticed Xserver crash
>>
>> Not a bug - SMF doesn't start nor monitor the X server - SMF starts
>> gdm, which handles those responsibilities for X servers
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
Fine, we probably have two bugs here:
1. svcs hasn't noticed Xserver crash
Not a bug - SMF doesn't start nor monitor the X server - SMF starts
gdm, which handles those responsibilities for X servers.
Will it survive underlying x server crash?
Henry Pepper
writes:
> Hi
>
> A snv_110 x86 NFS client has a problem with a Linux NFS server.
>
> The mount works fine, but even though the user has the same uid on
> both client and server, then the user on the client is not given
> access to directories with 770 mode.
> It seems that some how
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
> Fine, we probably have two bugs here:
>
> 1. svcs hasn't noticed Xserver crash
Not a bug - SMF doesn't start nor monitor the X server - SMF starts
gdm, which handles those responsibilities for X servers.
> 2. Xserver dumps core on specific hardware
That would be a bug
Is there a standard tools to verify disk bandwidth for x86-64. (like io
Meter). I have been using standard tools like dd.
I understand that IO Meter is not available for x86-64. if so, are there any
chances to get it a ported?
Thanks
Vijay
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:34 PM, a polite person wrote privately:
>>> I seem to think this was an April Fool's joke.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Ouch
>>
>> I don't have a smart phone.
>> I still
Robert:
After upgrading to 110 and running pfexec init 6, the system reboots and ends
up at the 'opensolaris console login:' prompt
First thing I'd check is whether the display manager service
is starting and failing. On OpenSolaris, GDM is the default login
program and Nevada still uses CD
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, C. wrote:
> Anon Y Mous wrote:
>>>
>>> enough of the iPhone's low-level hardware interface has been reverse
>>> engineered to > get the MilaX up and running
>>>
>>
>> You are a genius!
>>
>
> I see Anon Y Mous doesn't live in a country where they have the iPhone ;)
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:34 PM, a polite person wrote privately:
>> I seem to think this was an April Fool's joke.
>>
>
>
>
> Ouch
>
> I don't have a smart phone.
> I still have my good old Motorola Razr.
>
> No clue.
> I wondered how this
aric writes:
> The failsafe does not appear to understand the 'boot' command. I tried
> setting the svcadm milestone -d none: svcadm Repository is read-only.
> Exiting. Init 6 and rebooting puts me back to the same problem. Can I edit
> grub to do this?
Yes. At boot time, edit the grub entry (
"IBM Near Deal to Buy Sun for Lower Price"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123869375752683145.html
Sun Microsystems shares again on the rise..
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
Hi
I've tried to add smuxpeer to the snmpd.conf, but running
/usr/sfw/sbin/snmpd -Dregister_mib -Dmib_init -L
spits out the following error:
...
/etc/sma/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 109: Warning: Unknown token: smuxpeer.
...
I see the same issue on Sol10u6x86.
What am I missing?
Shouldn't the confi
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
Which hardware do you use? Are you running Xen? please provide svcs
-xv output.
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H 780G Socket AM2+ motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 X2 BE-2400 SKT AM2 2.3 GHz processor
Not running Xen
running svcs -xv returns to the command prompt with outputting any
Fine, we probably have two bugs here:
1. svcs hasn't noticed Xserver crash
2. Xserver dumps core on specific hardware
If it's possible, please try another graphic card; in any case, please
save core file somewhere and, if you want to help us to improve, please
report those two bugs, attaching
Robert Buick wrote:
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
Which hardware do you use? Are you running Xen? please provide svcs
-xv output.
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H 780G Socket AM2+ motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 X2 BE-2400 SKT AM2 2.3 GHz processor
Not running Xen
running svcs -xv returns to the command pro
Which hardware do you use? Are you running Xen? please provide svcs -xv
output.
Robert Buick wrote:
After upgrading to 110 and running pfexec init 6, the system reboots and ends
up at the 'opensolaris console login:' prompt
the display is:
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_110 64-bit
Copy
After upgrading to 110 and running pfexec init 6, the system reboots and ends
up at the 'opensolaris console login:' prompt
the display is:
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_110 64-bit
Copyright blah blah
.
.
.
Configuring devices:
Loading smf(5) service descriptions: 59/59
Reading ZFS config:
Basically, U20 is supported and should work fine -- and it does, we have
lots of them.
You should probably boot solaris with -kdv flags and take a look at kmdb
output
aric wrote:
I am having lots of problems with my machine. Yesterday I had a crash (black
screen) and afterward it would load t
Henry Pepper wrote:
I tried to set domain name to the same on both systems. That did not
seem to help.
I tried, as per Paul's suggestion to limit the vers to 2, this works.
It does not work when the vers=3 or when version isn't limited.
I did a snoop on the vers=3, and I couldn't see any errors
41 matches
Mail list logo
