> as we tested scaling and put more load on the servers (i.e. allowing
> Apache to spawn more children), we were surprised to see that the system
> doesn't tend to go below 8Gb (half) of the available RAM. Further requests
> for memory allocation failed (can't fork new processes including new ss
Pilli
El anticuario del que hablé anteriormente no quiso siquiera leer el CD live que
tengo de Open Solaris. Pero quisiera instalar el SO Open Solaris mediante
Virtual Box, en una Compac de 120 gigas y 1 giga en Ram. El detalle está en que
no sé ni por dónde empezar. Cuando leo los manuales de
Please refer to prior threads where this has been discussed. In a nutshell you
wont get any definitive answer until the acquisition is complete.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensol
Will Opensolaris be still around after 1 or maximum 2 years ?
Will Oracle suffocate Opensolaris and Solaris slowly ?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
John Martin wrote:
Bill Shannon wrote:
I just upgraded (using package manager "upgrade all") from snv_101a
to snv_111a. When I reboot in the new boot environment, it crashes
right away. Since it reboots after the crash, clearing the screen,
it's really hard to catch why it's failing. I resort
Bill Shannon wrote:
I just upgraded (using package manager "upgrade all") from snv_101a
to snv_111a. When I reboot in the new boot environment, it crashes
right away. Since it reboots after the crash, clearing the screen,
it's really hard to catch why it's failing. I resorted to taking a
pictu
I just upgraded (using package manager "upgrade all") from snv_101a
to snv_111a. When I reboot in the new boot environment, it crashes
right away. Since it reboots after the crash, clearing the screen,
it's really hard to catch why it's failing. I resorted to taking a
picture of the screen befo
Hi all
Here's the poll for the next CHOSUG Zurich Beer2Beer Event. Again @ Restaurant
Les Arcades at Zurich Mainstation.
http://www.doodle.com/ais7tt4r7pwnbfkt
There is no agenda yet, but I'm open for proposals.
Cheers
Mika
___
opensolaris-discuss
david.co...@sun.com wrote:
Other known issues in this repository update
6811922 PCIE init err info failed BDF 0x0 on snv_109 (Ultra 20 M2)
I asked about this before but never got a complete answer. Let's try
again...
I have an Ultra 20, not an Ul
Hello Documentation Community,
The OpenSolaris 2009.06 Image Packaging System Guide is ready for review.
The pdf is located at :
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/documentation/reviews/GSG_200906_Review.pdf
This is a beta document and some links may point to older documentation.
Please review
If you are going to support 1000-2000 clients, then you should consider Solaris
10 and not OpenSolaris. OpenSolaris is not that stable as S10 is. For
production S10 is recommended. I advice you to not use OpenSolaris for
1000-2000 users, but S10 instead.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.
Actually, I like the default Opensolaris desktop. But if you want something
other than Gnome, under Ubuntu I've used xfce, and like it. (I don't much like
Ubuntu's default look.) I see that they have a binary for Solaris 10.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Hi all,
I have a server set up with OpenSolaris 08.11, and I have a Brother HL-1440
attached to it (non-Postscript, PCL only). I would like to be able to print
from my laptop running the same OS, and two windows PCs, one running XP, the
other running Vista. I tried to set this up through IPP,
I've looked all over that site and can't seem to find any documentation. Before
I download it, is there a way to see what it does? I'm particularly interested
whether it has a clustered configuration.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
ope
Amir Azarmi wrote:
> dscacheutil -flushcache not available in OSX 10.4.x . I used lookupd
> -flushcache instead:
>
> MacBook:~ amirazarmi$ lookupd -flushcache
> MacBook:~ amirazarmi$ ping homer.local
> PING homer.local.wag160n (195.238.237.143): 56 data bytes
> (...and then it hangs there...)
>
Michael Schuster wrote:
On 04/24/09 07:58, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Frank Che wrote:
Installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 build 111a on a 64 bit system. Found that
file /kernel/genunix doesn't exist. While on build 111, that file is
still there.
Is this a problem or a new feature?
Sounds similar to
Mark Breecher wrote:
Thanks for the reply,
On the the Solaris Distribution from Sun.com you of course have a choice of
either the Java Desktop System or CDE.
Well I realize that you have stopped developing CDE (which is a shame) but the
GNOME desktop is nothing like Java Desktop System on Sol
Thanks for the reply,
On the the Solaris Distribution from Sun.com you of course have a choice of
either the Java Desktop System or CDE.
Well I realize that you have stopped developing CDE (which is a shame) but the
GNOME desktop is nothing like Java Desktop System on Solaris 10? Is it possible
Mark Breecher wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any way to get rid of GNOME and get JDS on an OpenSolaris
> Installation?
JDS *is* GNOME. Are you just looking for the different panel layout
or something else?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Sun Microsyst
Hi all,
Is there any way to get rid of GNOME and get JDS on an OpenSolaris Installation?
Thanks
Mark
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> 1.I discoverred that Power Management seems no longer to work.
> (The fan is blowing like hell and "kstat -m cpu_info" shows in
> currentClock_Hz 200100
> but
> supported_frequencies_Hz
> 8:12:16:20:200100
>
> New Bug with b111a ?
Try to use powertop to
Dear all
I have the following Q's:
1. Is is possible to install Oracle 11g on OpenSolaris?
2. Can i Connect XP clients (with VB.6 applications) to OpenSolaris Server
using windows authentication and AD if its installed on opensolaris?
3. Can OpenSolaris Server support 1000-2000 clients?
4. what
Detlef drew...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
with b111a now I can boot again my Toshiba M9.
1.I discoverred that Power Management seems no longer to work.
(The fan is blowing like hell and "kstat -m cpu_info" shows in
currentClock_Hz 200100
but
supported_frequencies_Hz
8:12:16:
On 24/04/2009, at 11:51 AM, Vincent Murphy wrote:
All,
Here is a link to the agenda and con-call information for tomorrow's
Townhall meeting
http://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/
OpenSolaris_Townhall_Apr_24_2009
Unfortunately we've been unable to record this call today, so I would
e
Hi,
I'm trying to install apache+mod_perl+mod_php in a fully 64 bit
environment, but apparently I can't proceed because every single
version of perl around for solaris (sun's, blastwave's, webstack's)
is compiled exclusively in 32-bit mode.
I even had to manually patch the makefiles in mod_per
Frank Che wrote:
> Installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 build 111a on a 64 bit system. Found that
> file /kernel/genunix doesn't exist. While on build 111, that file is
> still there.
>
> Is this a problem or a new feature?
Sounds similar to a bug David filed last night:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/b
New OpenSolaris 2009.06 install. I installed several 64 bit systems,
bare metals and virtual machines, all don't have the 32 bit version of
this file. Also installed 111a on a 32 bit system, and the 32 bit
version is present on that system.
Lurie Wrote:
Installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 build 111
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 05:37 -0700, Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just playing around with fuse a little bit on an opensolaris box
> running in a virtual box. Then I had a situation where I had an assertion
> fault in my libfuse linked executable in the middle of running a rename. T
Hi,
with b111a now I can boot again my Toshiba M9.
1.I discoverred that Power Management seems no longer to work.
(The fan is blowing like hell and "kstat -m cpu_info" shows in
currentClock_Hz 200100
but
supported_frequencies_Hz
8:12:16:20:200100
New Bug
Hi,
I was just playing around with fuse a little bit on an opensolaris box running
in a virtual box. Then I had a situation where I had an assertion fault in my
libfuse linked executable in the middle of running a rename. This caused the
executable to terminate. After that the mv command that
> Installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 build 111a on a 64 bit
> system. Found that
> file /kernel/genunix doesn't exist. While on build
> 111, that file is
> still there.
>
> Is this a problem or a new feature?
>
Is it a new install or upgrade ? It definitely should be there as it's a part
of SUNWck
dscacheutil -flushcache not available in OSX 10.4.x . I used lookupd
-flushcache instead:
MacBook:~ amirazarmi$ lookupd -flushcache
MacBook:~ amirazarmi$ ping homer.local
PING homer.local.wag160n (195.238.237.143): 56 data bytes
(...and then it hangs there...)
wag160n is the default name my wire
I think I am misunderstanding something about Solaris virtual memory...
I was running some tests on our new T5120 with 16Gb RAM with Solaris 10u6
(and previously got in the same situation with an X4600 and OpenSolaris 105):
when the systems arrived, we assumed they have "lots of RAM" for our task
Calling curl_setopt with the CURLOPT_NOBODY option, either with TRUE or FALSE
values causes problems.
With TRUE, the HTTP POST simply fails.
With FALSE, the content is not sent, as if TRUE had been set.
So I omitted it entirely since my application does not need this. Just a
heads-up in case s
Installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 build 111a on a 64 bit system. Found that
file /kernel/genunix doesn't exist. While on build 111, that file is
still there.
Is this a problem or a new feature?
Thanks,
Frank.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
openso
Gohan,
How about
% export GST_PLUGIN_PATH=/opt/csw/lib/gstreamer-0.10; gst-inspect
gst-inspect can print out the information for GStreamer plugins you have
on your box. Do you have the mpeg video decoder in the list?
As the packages come from Blastwave, maybe you want to also try the
rhythmbox
36 matches
Mail list logo
