Are there any issues in using zfs-auto-snapshot ?
> The best solution is to use star. Star supports real reliable multi-volume
> archives
> and star supports incremental backups.
Under snv_b112 there is only this for star :
bash-3.2# find / -name star -print
/usr/openwin/share/include/X11/bitmaps
Dear all,
I am not really familiar about Solaris 10.
Thanks to all of you, now, i just open all in netservices and xBrowser works
fine :-).
The reason i install OpenSolaris because i want to start learning ZFS, FMA and
SMF features.
If you dont mind, can share resources to me.
Thanks.
--
Th
OK - this appears to be a plug and play problem - the 98 was fine hotswapping
the 109b does not like it. any thoughts???
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
oh thnx...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ok - no removable media appears to work anymore.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have a USB, 3.5" infinity-in-one flash card reader (sd, mmc, usb, mem stick,
cf card, etc, etc) - on SNV_98 it worked perfectly, but after updating,
SNV_109b does not want to mount disks.
Is it a result of the status of the update? or is something possibly wrong with
the hardware. It just sa
Thanks, I'm updated and running. Fun!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> By the number of links, I'll bet the binary you're looking at is just
> a link to isaexec and the real top binaries that isaexec runs are in
> /usr/bin/{i386,amd64,sparcv7,sparcv9}/ and similar /opt/csw/bin paths.
Indeed, thanks!
_
PS:
[117] $ uname -a
SunOS zfs01.server.peak.org 5.11 snv_101b i86pc i386 i86pc
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I don't think it's the same thing, as it's not even starting up; here's the
truss output tail:
11180: open("601/lpsinfo", O_RDONLY) = 26
11180: fstat(26, 0xFD7FFFDFEF60) = 0
11180: fstat(26, 0xFD7FFFDFF2F0) = 0
11180: pread(26, "13
> 3 apparently identical binaries, but only one works?!?
Yep, that's the "isaexec" binary. The real top binary is
/bin/amd64/top (64-bit) or /bin/i86/top (32-bit).
Which version of OpenSolaris are you using?
There was a malloc heap corruption issue with top
in recent releases, maybe that explai
Alan wrote:
> 3 apparently identical binaries, but only one works?!?
>
> [123] $ lf -l /bin/top /usr/bin/top /opt/csw/bin/top
> -r-xr-xr-x 76 root bin 8248 2008-11-19 16:13 /bin/top*
> -r-xr-xr-x 9 root bin 8248 2008-11-19 16:13 /opt/csw/bin/top*
> -r-xr-xr-x 76 root bin 8248 2008-11-19 16:13 /u
3 apparently identical binaries, but only one works?!?
[123] $ lf -l /bin/top /usr/bin/top /opt/csw/bin/top
-r-xr-xr-x 76 root bin 8248 2008-11-19 16:13 /bin/top*
-r-xr-xr-x 9 root bin 8248 2008-11-19 16:13 /opt/csw/bin/top*
-r-xr-xr-x 76 root bin 8248 2008-11-19 16:13 /usr/bin/top*
[124] $ /bi
Most startup scripts have been replaced by SMF.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5175/smf-5?l=en&a=view&q=smf
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike Magie writes:
> What replaced the /etc/rc2.d/s89 startup scripts in Solaris 10?
There's no simple answer to that, because the numbers on the scripts
reflected only relative ordering, not any sort of identity. (In other
words, administrators and third party vendors were free to use S89 as
a
What replaced the /etc/rc2.d/s89 startup scripts in Solaris 10?
Mike
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> The zfs send and receive commands are not enterprise-backup solutions.
> The receive operation is an all-or-nothing event, you can get all of a
> snapshot or none of it. If you store the output of zfs send on a file
> or
> on tape, and that file becomes corrupted, then it will not be possible
> t
Daniil Churikov wrote:
some days ago i installed a "glassfishv2" package via "pkg install glassfishv2"
from dev repository
today i tried to uninstall it via "pkg uninstall glassfishv2", and it was
successfully uninstalled...
but all files under /usr/appserver directory (including configs, binar
Scott Rotondo wrote:
Oscar del Rio wrote:
Sven Marcel Buchholz wrote:
The reason could be the Security by Default:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/projects/sbd/
After a "netservices open" you should be able to connect via XDMCP.
Opening all services might be overkill.
Just e
I didn't see here that a bug was filed. As I'm experiencing the same, I've file
one myself: http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=8515. Sorry if
it's a duplicate.
Thanks,
Brian
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-dis
Christian Pélissier wrote:
> When did Sun offer zfsdump and zfsrestore to Solaris/openSolaris ?
>
> See RFE CR6736794. Enterprise backup solutions, as well as other copying
> methods, such as cp, tar, rsync, pax, cpio, and so on, are more
> appropriate for backup/restore than zfs send/receive.
>
Oscar del Rio wrote:
Sven Marcel Buchholz wrote:
The reason could be the Security by Default:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/projects/sbd/
After a "netservices open" you should be able to connect via XDMCP.
Opening all services might be overkill.
Just enable "tcp_listen" on
delrio wrote:
> Opening all services might be overkill.
> Just enable "tcp_listen" on the x11-server.
>
> svccfg -s x11-server setprop options/tcp_listen=true
Good point! I am still new to Solaris but the concepts behind SMF are on my
todo-list. ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
When did Sun offer zfsdump and zfsrestore to Solaris/openSolaris ?
=== found in ZFS best practice document
The zfs send and receive commands are not enterprise-backup solutions.
The receive operation is an all-or-nothing event, you can get all of a
snapshot or none of it. If you store the output
Sven Marcel Buchholz wrote:
The reason could be the Security by Default:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/projects/sbd/
After a "netservices open" you should be able to connect via XDMCP.
Opening all services might be overkill.
Just enable "tcp_listen" on the x11-server.
svccf
Here's the poll for the next CHOSUG Zurich Beer2Beer Event. Again @
Restaurant Les Arcades at Zurich Mainstation.
http://www.doodle.com/ais7tt4r7pwnbfkt
There is no agenda yet, but I'm open for proposals.
Just a friendly reminder for you to take part in the poll.
For your motivation: I've g
The reason could be the Security by Default:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/security/projects/sbd/
After a "netservices open" you should be able to connect via XDMCP.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
Dear all,
Whenever i tried to connect to my Solaris 10, i saw this error "XDMCP
connection failed"
I did the following:
1. Login as a root.
2. Enable CDE login when system boot:
$ /usr/dt/bin/dtconfig -e [enter]
3. Reset the process: dtconfig -reset
BUT still with no luck.
Any ideas?
--
This
28 matches
Mail list logo
