The Toshiba laptops available in the UK have that have OpenSolaris
pre-installed have quite small screens. I can recommend the Tecra A9 for use
with OpenSolaris as well. It seems to share most of the platform specific
elements like keyboard FN key and volume control with the M10 so everything
I have a system with many hundreds of disks SAN attached and when I run vmstat
on that systems it is very painfully slow to report output. Running truss I
find that it is doing lstat on about 4000 device links among other things. Is
there any way to make vmstat skip the lstat on every disk on
Georg-W. Koltermann writes:
From Kazuhiko Kobayashi chototsu_moush...@yahoo.co.jp:
USB serial freesing problem(Bug ID 6719062) patch and
binary for snv111
http://chototsumoushinp.dip.jp/solaris/usbser.snv111.t
ar.bz2
[...]
chototsu you rock!!
I'm online from OpenSolaris 2009.6
Sebastien Roy stated:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:24 -0700, nitesh wrote:
Is any c/c++ compiler is available with this release of open solaris. If
yes at which location it is located in installation. Or how can i configure
it to point to the gcc installation, if it is with the OS.
Or
I did see this in a pkg search I did, but is
this supported ?
how is this different than PTL 4820 ? , which is
targeting the integration of GCC 4.3.x into
Nevada/OpenSolaris by svn_130
Jim
/
Sean McGrath wrote:
Sebastien Roy stated:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:24
Sean McGrath wrote:
Sebastien Roy stated:
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 11:24 -0700, nitesh wrote:
Is any c/c++ compiler is available with this release of open solaris. If
yes at which location it is located in installation. Or how can i configure
it to point to the gcc installation, if it is
Jim Langston stated:
I did see this in a pkg search I did, but is
this supported ?
how is this different than PTL 4820 ? , which is
targeting the integration of GCC 4.3.x into
Nevada/OpenSolaris by svn_130
This one would be replacing gcc3.4, it first has to be able to compile
solaris and
Update to my original post:
I found the following in vmstat truss output...
20157: open(/dev/kstat, O_RDONLY)= 3
20157: ioctl(3, KSTAT_IOC_CHAIN_ID, 0x)= 59532
20157: ioctl(3, KSTAT_IOC_READ, kstat_headers) Err#12 ENOMEM
And I found some references
I am attempting to get vpnc to run on my system Build 81. It starts to run but
configures a tun0 interface as below:
tun0: flags=10008d0POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST,IPv4 mtu 1500 index 6
inet 0.0.0.0 -- 0.0.0.0 netmask 0
After this I am unable to remove the interface with the
Karel Gardas wrote:
Doesn't `ss-dev' install always Sun Studio Express on OS 2009.06 while
the link http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/index.jsp
provides real Sun Studio version?
If by real Sun Studio you mean the release version, then yes, but
you'll get a subpar experience with
Dennis Clarke wrote:
ss, I can only assume you mean this :
Sun Studio Express - March 2009 Build
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/express/index.jsp
Is this the *exact* same thing that is available for OpenSolaris? I
thought that the OpenSolaris/Nevada ON bits were still to be
--- On Thu, 6/11/09, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
From: Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Regarding GCC
To: dcla...@blastwave.org
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, Karel Gardas
karel.gar...@centrum.cz
Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009,
Hello,
Since developers are getting more involved in using the GCC compiler and
especially the GCC 4.4.x compilers, I started wondering why not migrate
to GCC 4.4.x sooner than later?? We have more community developers
building, testing, and reporting on GCC 4.4.x than before.
What is the
* ken mays (maybird1...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Hello,
Since developers are getting more involved in using the GCC compiler
and especially the GCC 4.4.x compilers, I started wondering why not
migrate to GCC 4.4.x sooner than later?? We have more community
developers building, testing, and
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* ken mays (maybird1...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Hello,
Since developers are getting more involved in using the GCC compiler
and especially the GCC 4.4.x compilers, I started wondering why not
migrate to GCC 4.4.x sooner than later?? We have more community
developers building,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know a solution to use Cisco Anyclient
on Solaris? Cisco seems to deprecate the old vpn service.
I have to use the Cisco client to access one of my client's site. I run
the client in a win2K VM and use shared folders to transfer files and
access
* Ian Collins (i...@ianshome.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* ken mays (maybird1...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Hello,
Since developers are getting more involved in using the GCC compiler
and especially the GCC 4.4.x compilers, I started wondering why not
migrate to GCC 4.4.x sooner than
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Is this the *exact* same thing that is available for OpenSolaris? I
thought that the OpenSolaris/Nevada ON bits were still to be built with
Sun Studio 11?
No, pretty much all consolidations moved from Studio 11 to Studio 12
last year. To match the consolidation builds,
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Is this the *exact* same thing that is available for OpenSolaris? I
thought that the OpenSolaris/Nevada ON bits were still to be built with
Sun Studio 11?
No, pretty much all consolidations moved from Studio 11 to Studio 12
last year. To match
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Is this the *exact* same thing that is available for OpenSolaris? I
thought that the OpenSolaris/Nevada ON bits were still to be built with
Sun Studio 11?
No, pretty much all consolidations moved from Studio 11 to Studio 12
last year. To match the consolidation
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Ian Collins (i...@ianshome.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* ken mays (maybird1...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Hello,
Since developers are getting more involved in using the GCC compiler
and especially the GCC 4.4.x compilers, I started wondering why not
Call me old fashioned but I like having things installed as packages
and not via a tarball. IPS delivers software with far more fine grained
control and intelligence than a tarball ever did.
When I try to install using StudioExpress-sol-x86-2009-03-pkg.sh in a
non-global zone I get no progress
Jim Langston wrote:
This is where my confusion rests - SUNWgcc is still 3.4.3, it is
through the development package that 4.3.3 gets loaded, are they
both supported ? I'm confused because SUNWgcc seems distinctly
directed as core part of OS, whereas, development/gcc seems to
have a you're on
* Jim Langston (jim.langs...@sun.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Ian Collins (i...@ianshome.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* ken mays (maybird1...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Hello,
Since developers are getting more involved in using the GCC compiler
and especially the GCC
* Shawn Walker (swal...@opensolaris.org) wrote:
Jim Langston wrote:
This is where my confusion rests - SUNWgcc is still 3.4.3, it is
through the development package that 4.3.3 gets loaded, are they
both supported ? I'm confused because SUNWgcc seems distinctly
directed as core part of OS,
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Jim Langston (jim.langs...@sun.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Ian Collins (i...@ianshome.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* ken mays (maybird1...@yahoo.com) wrote:
Hello,
Since developers are getting more
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* Shawn Walker (swal...@opensolaris.org) wrote:
Jim Langston wrote:
This is where my confusion rests - SUNWgcc is still 3.4.3, it is
through the development package that 4.3.3 gets loaded, are they
both supported ? I'm confused because SUNWgcc seems distinctly
directed as
* Mark Martin (storycraf...@gmail.com) wrote:
I can't speak definitively about this, but my best guess is that SUNWgcc
is still 3.4.3 because the ON consolidation hasn't qualified later
builds of GCC for building ON. And so, the supported method for
compiling code using GCC in ON is to use
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Dennis Clarkedcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
Call me old fashioned but I like having things installed as packages
and not via a tarball. IPS delivers software with far more fine grained
control and intelligence than a tarball ever did.
You're old-fashioned :-)
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
I can't speak definitively about this, but my best guess is that SUNWgcc
is still 3.4.3 because the ON consolidation hasn't qualified later
builds of GCC for building ON. And so, the supported method for
compiling code using GCC in ON is to use 3.4.3 until such time as
* Scott Rotondo (scott.roto...@sun.com) wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
I can't speak definitively about this, but my best guess is that SUNWgcc
is still 3.4.3 because the ON consolidation hasn't qualified later
builds of GCC for building ON. And so, the supported method for
compiling code
#define developers please
i think ppl are using gcc on *solaris because:
a) they dont know that suncc exist
b) they havent got enough skill to fix gccism
b2) there are too many gccism and they are lazy
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:57 PM, ken maysmaybird1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
Since
sorry, forgot the
c) hardcore opensource/gnu fanboyz
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Andras Barnaandras.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
#define developers please
i think ppl are using gcc on *solaris because:
a) they dont know that suncc exist
b) they havent got enough skill to fix gccism
b2)
You do a disservice by dismissing anyone who may know about Sun Studio
as either lacking skill or being lazy. There are plenty of developers
who have written software on other platforms (OS X, Linux, etc.) who
have written perfectly good software with gcc-isms, and have users (like
us)
the discussion is not about having or not having gcc *in* solaris.
gcc3 as well as gcc4 is available in opensolaris 2009.06
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Lauste...@opensolaris.org wrote:
You do a disservice by dismissing anyone who may know about Sun Studio as
either lacking skill
Stephen Lau wrote:
You do a disservice by dismissing anyone who may know about Sun Studio
as either lacking skill or being lazy. There are plenty of developers
who have written software on other platforms (OS X, Linux, etc.) who
have written perfectly good software with gcc-isms, and have
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
I can't speak definitively about this, but my best guess is that SUNWgcc
is still 3.4.3 because the ON consolidation hasn't qualified later
builds of GCC for building ON. And so, the supported method for
compiling code using GCC in ON is to use 3.4.3 until such time as
Shawn Walker wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
You do a disservice by dismissing anyone who may know about Sun
Studio as either lacking skill or being lazy. There are plenty of
developers who have written software on other platforms (OS X, Linux,
etc.) who have written perfectly good software with
Hi everyone,
This is my first post to these forums, but I must first say that there is alot
of very useful data here and I am very glad to see such a large community of
contributors. I have been working with Solaris 10 now for about 3 years, coming
from the linux world, there is no reason to
I would like to note that the reason I gave this thread this title, was not to
be alarming, but because I assume that the metadata on the disks is somehow bad
causing ZFS to panic in a very specific way.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Some data I forgot to add:
I have tried installing opensolaris 2009.06 and importing the pool, yields the
same results as Solaris 10 U7
The array is configured to use all 24 disks in a radz2 configuration with 2
hot-spares this gives me about 16TB of usable space. The recordsize has
remained
Forwarded to zfs-discuss...
Cheers,
Jim
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I've put my Adaptec 2410SA enclosure in my OpenSolaris box. I can't get the
drives to appear in the format list. The drives are found by the Adaptec
BIOS, but it seems the Adaptec BIOS ignores the drives completely unless you
create a raid array from them? No logical drives found it says. And
Karel Gardas wrote:
Hello,
I'm proceeding with upgrade from SXDE 1/08 (snv 79a) to OS 2009.06 and it seems
I start to get issue with my board built in Marvel NICs. The board is Asus
P5W64 WS Professional and it provides Marvel 88E8001 and 88E8052 chip based
NICs. On SXDE I've used driver
casper@sun.com wrote:
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
I can't speak definitively about this, but my best guess is that
SUNWgcc
is still 3.4.3 because the ON consolidation hasn't qualified later
builds of GCC for building ON. And so, the supported method for
compiling code using GCC in ON is to
45 matches
Mail list logo
