Hi Sriram,
I am not sure of the Opensolaris sparc DVD image roadmap. I am adding
the osol-discuss alias so that you get a better response.
Regards,
Krishnan
On 07/22/09 09:17, Sriram Sitaraman wrote:
is there a plan to create a DVD image. seems like a lot of work to set up a
single node.
Hi,
Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will use
/usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where are include and
lib files, then try with:
./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/
Regards,
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Rino Mardo wrote:
normal behaviour? um, i've used gnome before with other nixes, most notably
linux, and it doesn't behave like that.
adding menu items shouldn't require to kill the gnome-panel process. it should
just appear right away.
could this be a bug then?
Rino,
Definitely a bug,
Hi,
After enabling core dumps as you suggested and running
/usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes
I got a core dump from hald. I have attached the output of the above command in
hal-log.txt. I have also attached the output of pflags and pstack on the core
file.
Does that help?
Thanks,
leon.sha leon@sun.com wrote:
Did you LD_LIBRARY_PATH by yourself?
Try to unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH and start /usr/bin/firefox again.
If I use the firefox from sunfreeware, I do not need to unset the variable and
I never needed to do this.
If I unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH, /usr/bin/firefox
Hey folks,
I try to establish opensolaris as standard OS for my 40+ thumper/thors and
experience a couple of weirdnesses, maybe someone can enlighten me in some of
the issues :) (?)
I use an opensolaris install server and try to manage the post-install issues
through a custom pkg lying on a
why are there so many problems with FF 3.5 here? and what is svn117?
are we having the same release 2009/06? my installation was all default out of
the box. and i didn't uninstall the previous firefox, just changed the symlink.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
sure. i logged bug number 10194 in d.o.o.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Rino Mardo wrote:
sure. i logged bug number 10194 in d.o.o.
Thanks, I've taken a look and managed to recreate the issue. and I will
investigate further.
cheers
Matt
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)
OReilly Media just did this parody article making fun of SJV Nichols's Computer
World article:
Is Oracle getting ready to kill Unbreakable Linux?
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/07/is-oracle-getting-ready-to-kil.html
My guess is neither article is really right. Unbreakable Linux can't be
Hi Sriram,
There are plans to support this in the future using the text installer.
AI is definitely too much work for a single node.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/caiman/TextInstallerProject/
- Keith
krishnan parthasarathi - Sun Microsystems - Bangalore India wrote:
Hi Sriram,
I am
OK, the last new killer game-changing application in OpenSolaris was time
slider, which made it's debut in 2008.11, well now Jaris (the Japanese Solaris
distro) seems to have this new Wine-like tool already set up that makes it VERY
easy for clueless new users with no previous UNIX experience
Please see the attached output from the top command. It reports 100% CPU, even
though the listed processes add up to nowhere near that.
Although the user and kernel values do change, they always add up to 100%.
What could be causing this, or is it lying?
Thanks,
Matt
--
This message posted
Please see the attached output from the top command. It reports 100% CPU,
even though the listed processes add up to nowhere near that.
Although the user and kernel values do change, they always add up to
100%.
What could be causing this, or is it lying?
Don't use top. That is for linux
Hi,
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
My result also. I think we need very very new AMD Opterons to do this.
Dennis
___
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
My result also. I think we need very very new AMD Opterons to do this.
I did this test on a VT aware
prstat reports very similar numbers, although it doesn't tell you the total CPU
usage anywhere that I can tell, just per-process.
The thing that brought this to my attention in the first place was the gnome
system monitor.
I should have said first time round that I'm running OpenSolaris
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:53 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
Not 3.0.2, but VB 2.2.4 is running Vista64 just fine at the moment on
b117. This is on an
Hi,
I've got 2009.06 installed and will be using it as an NFS server in a
remote data center so I don't need any GUIs or graphics. I'd like to
disable the graphical desktop and graphical boot screen (the blue
background with the orange progress bar), as well as any other graphical
stuff
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but with 64bit Windows 7 RC
I have to make sure the IO APIC is enabled for the virtual guest hardware,
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
Hi,
I've got 2009.06 installed and will be using it as an NFS server in a
remote data center so I don't need any GUIs or graphics. I'd like to
disable the graphical desktop and graphical boot screen (the blue
background with the orange progress bar), as well as any
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Sean s...@ttys0.net writes:
We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues.
It fails here when ./configure is run like this:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql \
Harry Putnam wrote:
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Sean s...@ttys0.net writes:
We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues.
It fails here when ./configure is run like this:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test
After enabling core dumps as you suggested and running
/usr/lib/hal/hald --daemon=no --verbose=yes
I got a core dump from hald. I have attached the
output of the above command in hal-log.txt. I have
also attached the output of pflags and pstack on the
core file.
...
fee9ec34 strstr (0,
evaldas evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu writes:
Hi,
Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will
use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where
are include and lib files, then try with:
./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/
Thanks... but I'm a bit confused
Hmm... hey dude, you might want to check out the downloads section on Wine's
project website (http://winehq.org/) and, lo' and behold, is a link to the
OpenSolaris package download. I didn't see a development release package, but
at least there is something to try.
Matt
--
This message posted
Please see the attached output from the top command.
It reports 100% CPU, even though the listed processes
add up to nowhere near that.
Although the user and kernel values do change,
they always add up to 100%.
Load is high; and there are quite a few context switches,
system calls and
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will
use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where
are include and lib files, then try with:
./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/
Thanks... but I'm a bit confused
Harry Putnam wrote:
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Sean s...@ttys0.net writes:
We just compile it ourselves. It builds without any issues.
It fails here when ./configure is run like this:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql \
Harry Putnam wrote:
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will
use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where
are include and lib files, then try with:
./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/
Thanks... but I'm a
evaldas evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu writes:
Hi,
Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will
use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where
are include and lib files, then try with:
./configure --with-mysql=/usr/sfw/
Regards,
After tinkering around
I don't think that's a parody article. As far as I can tell, the article is
straight, and it makes sense to me. Since Oracle hasn't had much success
grabbing market share from Red Hat, why should it put much effort into
Unbreakable Linux? That's especially the case now that it owns Solaris:
Mark Martin storycraf...@gmail.com
writes:
ps- I also tried with includedir set after setting LDFLAGS as above.
Same result... same error.
You may want to try variations on the --includedir...sometimes there's
an implicit #include mysql/mysql.h in there... Try walking up the
tree to just
Jürgen Keil jrgn.k...@googlemail.com wrote:
did someone succeed to install a 64 Bit Vista under VB?
I did try to do this with 3.0.2 and I get a message that there
was a hardware problem.
I'm not sure if this is the same problem, but with 64bit Windows 7 RC
I have to make sure the IO
Harry Putnam wrote:
Mark Martin storycraf...@gmail.com
writes:
ps- I also tried with includedir set after setting LDFLAGS as above.
Same result... same error.
You may want to try variations on the --includedir...sometimes there's
an implicit #include mysql/mysql.h in there... Try
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right
place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can
pass to it or what I should change it to.
Here's the line I'm referring to:
kernel$
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes:
just adjust the path for mysql.
Setting that like you suggest:
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/mysql/5.1/lib -R/usr/mysql/5.1/lib;export LDFLAGS
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/test --with-mysql
change --with-mysql to --with-mysql=/usr/mysql/5.1
should
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the right
place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I can
pass to it or what I should change it to.
Here's the line I'm referring to:
kernel$
There are probably three lines above that you should also remove:
splashimage /boot/solaris.xpm
foreground d25f00
background 115d93
-- Alan
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the
right place to change
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
Check if you have in addition SUNWmysql installed, configure will
use /usr/sfw/bin/mysql_config from this package to figure out where
are include and lib files, then try with:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
I was looking at GRUB menu.lst and wondering if console= is the
right place to change that behavior, but I'm not sure what options I
can pass to it or what I should change it to.
Here's the line I'm
I think you have all got the discussion to technical.This is a straight
business case the questions to ansawer at oracle are as follows...
Can it make cash?
How much?
When?
Can oracle do it or should someone else do it?
If Oracle has not got the ansawers..like Nortels assets someone else needs
I think you have all got the discussion too technical.This is a straight
business case the questions to ansawer at oracle are as follows...
Can it make cash?
How much?
When?
Can oracle do it or should someone else do it?
If Oracle has not got the ansawers..like Nortels assets someone else
Jürgen Keil wrote:
Load is high; and there are quite a few context switches,
system calls and faults.
Maybe gnome-session is trying to start some gui
process is a loop, but the process is crashing?
To investigate this possibility, run the following as root
(or pfexec etc):
dtrace -s
Gavin Maltby wrote:
dtrace -s /use/demo/dtrace/whoexec.d
This may work better :)
dtrace -s /usr/demo/dtrace/whoexec.d
Cheers,
Jim
--
Jim Walker, http://blogs.sun.com/jwalker
Sun Microsystems, Broomfield, Colorado
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
It's a known issue. You could check CR6850995 for more details.
How about first remove your usb storage device, then start up hald
daemon, finally reconnect the usb storage device?
Thanks,
Lin
? 2009?07?22? 20:30, Matthew Stevenson wrote:
Hi,
After enabling core dumps as you suggested and
This is an old issue of mine but I figured I'd post the resolution.
This is a bug in the Areca Firmware. They have yet to publish a new version on
their site (as of 7-22-2009), but support may be able to get it to you. Mine
has the version of 1.47. I had to send the drives it wasn't working
Matthew Nawrocki wrote:
Hmm... hey dude, you might want to check out the downloads section on Wine's
project website (http://winehq.org/) and, lo' and behold, is a link to the
OpenSolaris package download. I didn't see a development release package, but
at least there is something to try.
Hi All,
Just want to know is there any way I can print variables used inside a function
using dtrace ?
Thanks
Akhil
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
i use opensoalris
#svcs
#mantenance Jul_21 svc:/system/cryptosvc:default
#svcs -xv svc:/system/cryptosvc:default
cat the log
find
[ Jul 20 07:54:56 Enabled. ]
[ Jul 20 07:54:57 Executing start method (/sbin/cryptoadm start). ]
cryptoadm: failed to open /dev/cryptoadm: No such file or
I see wine package in contrib rep:
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/info/0/wine%401.0.1%2C5.11-0.101%3A20081209T223210Z
But I have 2 questions:
1) Why is it so big (111 Mb against ~ 10 Mb of Ubuntu deb package)
2) Why does it depend on ent...@0.5.11-0.101? Does it mean that I can't use it
on
52 matches
Mail list logo
