I got irq shared between wpi, usb, and nvidia. I get random freezes to the gui.
how do I fix this?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Nicolas Michael wrote:
Hi,
when running our c++ application on Intel's Xeon 5570 processors with the latest Solaris 10 Update 7 (141415-10), we're having problems with exceptions not being caught properly when running 64bit processes. After some analysis, it seems that if an exception is thrown
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
Given a little foresight (and unless one is trying to do stuff on the extreme
cheap),
how many situations are there really that _need_ the additional option? Even
if
I think that the fact that this question is
Gary,
many thanks for the quick response.
Is there any defect number/link?
Thanks.
Chris
Chris,
The target build for the fix is 124.
Gary
Hello,
has this defect been fixed? Can someone provide
the
defect number/link?
I would like to update to 122, from 118. Just want
This would be a great first run for the newly created use-case project. Is
there anyone interested in helping me to create a formal use-case from this?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 19:01, Cyril Plisko cyril.pli...@mountall.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Richard L. Hamilton
Hi all,
I was trying to get install the cluster in Virtual box with nv122 build.
On installation i hit with the bug 6722138, then workaround it
(LD_PRELOAD=c_synonyms.so.1 export LD_PRELOAD).the installation went well. i
configured a single node cluster.
On Reboot the node get panics, even
How Wong wrote:
I got irq shared between wpi, usb, and nvidia. I get random freezes to the gui.
how do I fix this?
Treating the two sentences as possibly unrelated.
If your system and NVIDIA graphics card supports MSI, you can enable
MSI for the nvidia driver by commenting out the last line
John Martin wrote:
How Wong wrote:
I got irq shared between wpi, usb, and nvidia. I get random freezes
to the gui. how do I fix this?
Treating the two sentences as possibly unrelated.
If your system and NVIDIA graphics card supports MSI, you can enable
MSI for the nvidia driver by commenting
man snoop:
-a
Listen to packets on /dev/audio (warning: can be noisy).
That's why you get no output on screen. I'm assuming you have no
speakers/audio device, and I'll also assume you expected to see packets
on screen rather than hear them (which in itself is a nice gimmick, but
EON ZFS NAS 0.59.3 based on snv_122 released!
Embedded Operating system/Networking (EON), RAM based live ZFS NAS appliance is
released on Genunix! Much thanks to Al at Genunix.org for download hosting and
serving the opensolaris community.
It is available in a CIFS and Samba flavor
EON 64-bit
Conner,
Check out:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=412972
I don't see a bug number, but Alan is pretty confident that it will be fixed in
124.
Gary
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hello All,
Firstly apologies as I am going to use Sun Solaris 10
terminology as this is what I am more familiar with.
Is it possible to run large zones that are have been
built using Solaris 11/06 update 3 within a global
zone of Solaris 05/08 Update 5 and above?
Kind Regards,
SRG
man snoop:
-a Listen to packets on /dev/audio (warning: can be noisy).
That's why you get no output on screen.
snoop -a produces both a packet dump on stdout,
and produces noise on the audio device.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix
I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it
appears to be so...
ZFS
opensolaris% touch /var/tmp/bar
opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /var/tmp/bar
opensolaris%
TMPFS
opensolaris% touch /tmp/bar
opensolaris% chmod A=user:lp:r:deny /tmp/bar
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
tmpfs does not support ACLs
see _PC_ACL_ENABLED in [f]pathconf(2). You can query the file
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't support ACLs snd it
appears to
Roland Mainz wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
I have some vague recollection that tmpfs doesn't
Ian Collins wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
I have some vague recollection that
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
# mkfile 64m /zpool.file
# zpool create test
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
# mkfile 64m /zpool.file
Roland Mainz wrote:
Umpf... the matching code is linked with -Bdirect ... AFAIK I can't
interpose library functions linked with this option, right ?
You could set LD_NODIRECT to defeat direct bindings --- see ld.so.1(1).
However, I agree with the thought that it would be easier to just
have a
Roland Mainz wrote:
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
# mkfile
Roland Mainz wrote:
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do
Hi
Planning the following setup
nxge1+nxge2+nxge3+nxge4 = aggr1
aggr10001 = vlan10
aggr20001 = vlan20
aggr30001 = vlan30
aggr40001 = vlan40
aggr10001:1 - interface for 1st zone in vlan10
aggr10001:2 - interface for 2nd zone in vlan10 etc
On switch side LACP + trunking is configured, the
It is great to know there is a conceptual solution to the problem; I wish I
even had time to look in to it more just for fun.
I'd be happy to make a reasonable donation to such a project. I also like the
idea of bounties for open source projects in general; perhaps an adjunct
organization
Roland Mainz wrote:
Robert Thurlow wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do
I tried out sequential write using filebench on a raidz pool of 3 SATA disks
and got I/O bandwidth of 0.3mb/s.
iscsi target OS version :Open solaris 2009.06
iscsi iniator OS version :Open solaris 2009.06
IO Summary: 21 ops, 0.3 ops/s, (0/0 r/w) 0.3mb/s, 62850us cpu/op,
1993.3ms
29 matches
Mail list logo
