Hello all,
Can we please EOL the use of *indiana* soon, archive all the mailing
list entries and website pages, and formally replace it (and
rename/reallocate the project) with(in) OpenSolaris? Mike Kupfer
recently pointed out the fact the opening sentence on the indiana docs
page (
On 10/11/09 06:21 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Michal Pryc michal.p...@sun.com writes:
[...]
Harry,
Icon on the desktop is invoking:
gksu packagemanager
whoops... I missed that... thanks
Which de facto is calling pfexec.
So it looks like your privilages are broken. Here is what I have
Which is where the (somewhat ill thought out) differentiation between the
opensolaris product and opensolaris community becomes a problem.
Personally I believe that the opensolaris product should just be named as
Solaris Enterprise for the current Solaris, Solaris Standard for the
indiana stable
On 10/12/09 12:21 PM, Mark Phalan wrote:
On 10/11/09 06:21 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Michal Pryc michal.p...@sun.com writes:
[...]
Harry,
Icon on the desktop is invoking:
gksu packagemanager
whoops... I missed that... thanks
Which de facto is calling pfexec.
So it looks like your
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Arun Tomar tomar.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I really love zfs.
What i want to do is to create a zfs based storage solution say 15 TB
from commodity hardware.
What I have:
software: opensolaris 0906, belenix and solaris 10.
hardware: 2 normal
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Arun Tomar tomar.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I've a zfs box for storage and gigabit network. the max data transfer
speed that i could get is may be between 100-125 mbps need to check
that.
I wanted to achieve close to 300mbps of data transfer speed.
I
Arun Tomar wrote:
I've a zfs box for storage and gigabit network. the max data transfer
speed that i could get is may be between 100-125 mbps need to check
that.
Is that MBps (megabytes per second) or Mbps (megabits per second)? The
former sounds about right.
I wanted to achieve close to
There seems to be a bit more about this two year dispute than meets the eye.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/display/20081016063449_Foxconn_Set_to_Stop_Producing_Nvidia_GeForce_Graphics_Cards_Sources_Confirm.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 2009-10-11, Peter Jones bloosk...@netscape.net wrote:
Microsoft has announced that the next release windows 8 will
be a 128 bit system.Apart from haveing few applications,isv,isv,on
their side.Is this a marketing gimmick or saine thinking? Will
opensolaris work on 128 bit?
I'd say it's
Clarence CHU wrote:
Dear Alan,
So, all the users with no shell specified in /etc/passwd had to be changed,
done.
next is: Accessories-Terminator doesn't work.
That appears to be another bug you could have found in a search of
http://defect.opensolaris.org/ (though you'd have to do
Clarence CHU wrote:
Dear Alan,
So, all the users with no shell specified in /etc/passwd had to be changed,
done.
next is: Accessories-Terminator doesn't work.
This sounds like 6885253. You could edit terminator.py to
remove the pair of brackets (as suggested in the full bug
report behind
John Thompson wrote:
On 2009-10-11, Peter Jones bloosk...@netscape.net wrote:
Microsoft has announced that the next release windows 8 will
be a 128 bit system.Apart from haveing few applications,isv,isv,on
their side.Is this a marketing gimmick or saine thinking? Will
opensolaris work on
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Clarence CHU wrote:
Dear Alan,
So, all the users with no shell specified in /etc/passwd had to be changed,
done.
next is: Accessories-Terminator doesn't work.
That appears to be another bug you could have found in a search of
http://defect.opensolaris.org/
I have the habit of putting my root's home onto a separate partition, so /root
is
/dev/dsk/c1d1s1 /dev/rdsk/c1d1s1/root ufs 1 yes -
(yep, I know it's lame to be always root :))
I LU'ed from nv_104 to 124, and during boot the system goes into maintenance
mode, stating
does anyone know when we get a osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso release?
osol-1002-124-ai-sparc.iso is there -- which is good and very much (!)
appreciated -- but a osol-1002-XXX-sparc.iso would ease install and setup a lot
on sparc.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Mark Phalan wrote:
I would warn strongly against doing that. Primary Administrator
basically means root. NOT something you want to have associated with
your local user.
The fact that OpenSolaris assigns the Primary Administrator role is a
serious security problem. The first thing I do after
When i installed open solaris on my Campaq laptop the battery monitor would
never change off of 100% one time it even turned off on me when it said a 100%
. Any one have any ideas on how to fix that. If i could get that fixed i would
love to change back from windows to open solaris.
--
This
I need the locally-connected behavior of iScsi -- our work-a-day machines are
Macs and I want to use Time Machine
After I wrote this note I _then_ saw pointers to Comstar, and will be exploring
that this week.
I think I will likely end up using CIFS for communication between my various
I have a question about solaris boot strap main() function.
solaris create fsflush/pageout in main function by newproc() as sys class
kernel process and use kernel address space?
Is there any special reason we cannot implement fsflush(pid 2) and pageout
daemon(pid3) by thread_create() as a
19 matches
Mail list logo
