Greetings!
The OpenSolaris Elections are nearly here. The OGB has been working
hard to get ready for them and we hope you'll be able to participate.
Please read this entire email carefully. If you have questions send
them to ogb-disc...@opensolaris.org or ask during the Members Meeting.
This
[moving to pkg-discuss]
On 02/25/10 12:09 PM, Kristin Amundsen-Cubanski wrote:
Hello,
I have searched all over and I cannot find any reference to an error
like this.
We're trying to update our opensolaris server and it is getting stuck on
either indexing packages or optimizing the index in an
Please how can I with bash read a string for hashing with digest, from stdin?
bash-3.00$ digest -v -a md5 This is an input string.
digest: can not open input file This is an input string.
I did observe that the redirect operators are not displayed in the preview, so
I attach my example
On a DELL LATITUDE D630 and after upgrading from 111b to 133 gnome terminal is
broken. When booting build 133 GDM is OK. After login it's impossible to work
with gnome-terminal.
No echo, No line feed
stty sane CTRL-J give echo again
Message readline: warning: turning off output flushing is
You were so close :-(
$ echo This is an input string | digest -v -a md5
md5 35e1332bf506d35c7c9f1c2b0cb39d4e
Brian
Morten Gulbrandsen wrote:
Please how can I with bash read a string for hashing with digest, from stdin?
bash-3.00$ digest -v -a md5 This is an input string.
digest: can
On 26/02/2010 13:15, Christian Pélissier wrote:
On a DELL LATITUDE D630 and after upgrading from 111b to 133 gnome terminal is
broken. When booting build 133 GDM is OK. After login it's impossible to work
with gnome-terminal.
Hit that myself, it's in the release notes:
2380 image-update
Hello,
I wonder if anybody here attempted to get Qemu working with Crossbow provided
virtual NIC instead of using Qemu's TUN/TAP device. Yes, I can use VBox instead
of Qemu, but VBox does not allow me to set more virtual CPUs than 2x real CPUs
of the target machine and I would like to use Qemu
On 02/25/10 11:18 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
[moving to pkg-discuss]
On 02/25/10 12:09 PM, Kristin Amundsen-Cubanski wrote:
Hello,
I have searched all over and I cannot find any reference to an error
like this.
We're trying to update our opensolaris server and it is getting stuck on
either
When I am logged on as user in local session and in xvnc session I can not open
Gnome Performance Monitor. The workaround is to log off on the local session.
Can anybody reproduce?
Regards,
Tonmaus
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Some would say it is probably a bad idea, but this helped me.
in /etc/system set this line:
set zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The Bordeaux Technology Group released Bordeaux 2.0.2 for Solaris today.
Bordeaux 2.0.2 is a maintenance release that fixes a critical bug with sound
support. Customers who need sound support are advised to upgrade to this newer
release. This release has been tested on OpenSolaris 2009.06 as
snip
My take is this, I read all the 300+ messages posted at Slashdot, and found it
amazing that one could surmise what Oracle may or may not do wrt one of its
most important assets without seriously entering Chairman Larry into the
equation. (As we all know, Chairman Larry owns about one
Apologies for reviving a 2-week-old thread, but developments continue.
For example, our non-contract Solaris-10 systems using updatemanager
just got a couple new security patches this week
kgund...@teamcool.net said:
This will be the undoing of Solaris. One reason Sun got into such bad
Why am I seeing different information from Package Manager
than what I see when browsing pkg.opensolaris.org/dev? (Yes,
Package Manager is pointing at the dev repository.)
For instance, if I look at SUNWgmake in Package Manager, I see version
3.81 (Build 5.11-0.133). Browsing the repo I see:
On 02/26/10 06:20 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Why am I seeing different information from Package Manager
than what I see when browsing pkg.opensolaris.org/dev? (Yes,
Package Manager is pointing at the dev repository.)
For instance, if I look at SUNWgmake in Package Manager, I see version
3.81
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 04:28 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:20 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Why am I seeing different information from Package Manager
than what I see when browsing pkg.opensolaris.org/dev? (Yes,
Package Manager is pointing at the dev repository.)
For instance, if I look at SUNWgmake in
On 02/26/10 06:49 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 04:28 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:20 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Why am I seeing different information from Package Manager
than what I see when browsing pkg.opensolaris.org/dev? (Yes,
Package Manager is pointing at the dev
On 02/26/10 07:30 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 05:05 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:49 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 04:28 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:20 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Why am I seeing different information from Package Manager
than what I see when
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/2010 05:44 PM:
On 02/26/10 07:30 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 05:05 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:49 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 04:28 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:20 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Why am I seeing different information
On 02/26/10 08:15 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/2010 05:44 PM:
On 02/26/10 07:30 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 05:05 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:49 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 04:28 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:20 PM, Bill Shannon
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/2010 06:25 PM:
On 02/26/10 08:15 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/2010 05:44 PM:
On 02/26/10 07:30 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 05:05 PM:
On 02/26/10 06:49 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote on 02/26/10 04:28
Hello,
I ran pkg install with truss, in the hope of discovering why it takes so long
to complete, especially AFTER it has reported that every thing is installed.
I ran into this (for me) mysterious result :
# truss -o pkg.log -D pkg install diagnostic/wireshark
22 matches
Mail list logo
