Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
BTW, if it was true that every /usr/bin utility was going to be replaced
by a GNU one, would there have been a half dozen bug fixes to the Solaris
version of tar over the past couple of months?
Depends on how you look at it we could
On 2010-05-10, at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson wrote:
Where's your evidence, troll?
Here is the evidence:
Evidence 1:
- Project cooperation with ksh project withdrawn
- GNU commands as replacements are the future
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Sonnenschein
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dave Johnson
dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Here is the evidence:
Evidence 1:
- Project cooperation with ksh project withdrawn
- GNU commands as replacements are the future
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Sonnenschein
*** Apologies to all ***
... that I fell in Mr. Dave Johnson's traps twice.
Recently I didn't have much time for OpenSolaris.
I did not back-check Dave Johnson's claims sufficiently enough.
Sorry!
%martin bochnig
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Roland Mainz roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Roland Mainz roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dave Johnson
dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Bye,
Roland
P.S.: Wearing my hat as ksh93-integration project lead: No, neither
the ksh93-integration project nor
John Sonnenschein wrote:
You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to have to
ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is completely
unacceptable behaviour.
Given Mr. Johnson's previous posts about Opera dropping support to
avoid huge Oracle fees
John Sonnenschein wrote:
You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to
have to ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is
completely unacceptable behaviour.
Given Mr. Johnson's previous posts about Opera dropping support to
avoid huge Oracle fees
[...]
Nice attempt, unfortunately (for you) the ARC emails
are being archived.
[...]
Thank you.
I think you did confirm one point I've been making - that _authoritative_
communication can quickly put rumors to rest.
If the folks inside the firewall had a little more freedom to speak
as those
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
John Sonnenschein wrote:
You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to have to
ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is completely
unacceptable behaviour.
Given
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
John Sonnenschein wrote:
You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to have
to ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is
completely unacceptable behaviour.
Given Mr. Johnson's previous posts
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
John Sonnenschein wrote:
You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to
have to ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is
completely unacceptable behaviour.
Given Mr. Johnson's previous posts
On 05/11/10 09:54 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Alan Coopersmithalan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
John Sonnenschein wrote:
You are forging emails for your own political gains and I'm going to
have to ask you to stop slandering me and my work *immediately*. It is
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to Nexenta. if the time comes to
take drastic measures, if they are willing and have the resources, can
something be organized with nexenta to become the fork?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
No need to wait that long. If there is a call for a vote on the matter you
have my public input for a formal ban under the terms of the TOU now. If
there are some procedural details we can sort that out as required.
Quick question -- will a ban do any good? Is there anyway to verify
that
I am getting repetitive motion disorder just deleting all of the emails
in this thread. Really, you are hurting me. Isn't there something
more worthwhile that we can talk about? Can we create a separate forum
for OpenSolaris armchair speculators to blab away at each other without
bothering
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to Nexenta. if the time comes to
take drastic measures, if they are willing and have the resources, can
something be organized with nexenta to become the fork?
Troll.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
Furthermore I must also agree with Richard Hamilton: With (some more)
authoritative community interaction and communication from Oracle's
side, nobody could ever have believed such a troll in the first place.
Not for a
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if the time comes to take drastic
measures, if they are willing and have the
resources, can something be organized with nexenta
to become the fork?
The problem with specifying VPN solutions is that it allows for SSL and IPSec
VPNs.
Worked with Checkpoint for over 14 years I do not remember their ever being a
Solaris VPN client but they do offer SSL VPN. Cisco do support Solaris SPARC
on one of their VPN client applications, however the
Concerns are OK, but not the drastic moves you proposed... And combining
those, is not a good thing...
Matthias
You (Edward Martinez) wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if
Am 23 Apr 2010 um 04:04 schrieb Richard L. Hamilton:
Surely sufficient people exist that would pay for low-end support
(sunsolve+patches only, or sunsolve+access to a repo with bug fixes,
for OpenSolaris)
that otherwise might simply do without, or go elsewhere.
Staying profitable is
On 11 May 2010, at 17:27, russell aspinwall wrote:
Cisco do support Solaris SPARC on one of their VPN client applications,
however the latest Cisco AnyConnect VPN client is Windows only and is a SSL
VPN technology.
FWIW, there are Mac and Linux versions of the AnyConnect client as well.
Concerns are OK, but not the drastic moves you
proposed... And combining
those, is not a good thing...
Matthias
ward Martinez) wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I was wondering with D'Amore jumping over to
Nexenta. if
They did indeed, back in the days of Solaris 2.6. Their client is Sparc only
though.
The thing is you don't necessarily need client software to implement a VPN using
Cisco gear. I myself, am currently implementing a very small scale VPN
(L2TP over IPsec, LAC initiated dialin remote access) and
can nexenta become the fork?
Just my opinion:
1. It cannot. Nexenta is mostly Ubuntu with OpenSolaris kernel. Nexenta
engineers do not contribute (much) to OpenSolaris codebase. They are Oracle
(Sun) engineers who do.
2. The fork is not needed. OpenSolaris is actively developed at Oracle and
I forgot to say: I don't know what face browser means. If it is the
feature that enables the possibility of choosing users at the login
and/or poweroff/restart the the answer to this question is no.
- Robin.
On 2010-05-07 18:34, Brian Cameron wrote:
Robin:
According to the GDM debug output
Where is the email threads to substantiate your claims?
-Ghee
On 10/05/2010 11:50, Dave Johnson wrote:
This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
David
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Johnsondave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com
Date: Mon,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson
dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating
detail, my reading of the ARC discussions was that the ksh-93
Subject says it all.
--
Giovanni
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Dave Johnson
dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com wrote:
This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
Given the evidence we've been given on these matters by those who
are directly involved, it would seem that the most likely
On 11 May 2010, at 17:55, Edward Martinez wrote:
I'm sorry, with these kind if news i get concern and once i get concern
lot of ideas start flowing in my head on how i can help out.
Concerned about what? That somebody who was actively working on OpenSolaris is
now going to be...
On 11 May 2010, at 18:46, Francois Laagel wrote:
There's also vpnc (http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/) I haven't
tried it
but it seems that development/maintenance of that project stopped several
years ago.
It works just fine any time I've used it, as an alternative to Cisco's
On Tue, 11 May 2010 23:55:09 +0100, Calum Benson calum.ben...@oracle.com
wrote:
On 11 May 2010, at 18:46, Francois Laagel wrote:
There's also vpnc (http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/) I
haven't
tried it
but it seems that development/maintenance of that project stopped
several years
33 matches
Mail list logo
