On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Alan DuBoff al...@softorchestra.com wrote:
The comment about GNU is IMO unjustified. The ksh93-integration and
ATT team have done a much better technical job than GNU in the last
four years. We got ksh93, a lot of modernized tools, even more in the
work, with
You picked a bad example. GNU tar has its own share
of problems. By
default no other achiever than GNU tar can unpack
long path names in
archives created by GNU tar.
Maybe I just got lucky...
[al...@eagle Documents]$ gtar zcvf ./test.tgz tmp
tmp/
tmp/split log cut.jpg
tmp/Trailer Photo this
[...]
You picked a bad example. GNU tar has its own share
of problems. By
default no other achiever than GNU tar can unpack
long path names in
archives created by GNU tar. That's a big problem. It
becomes worse
because tar archives with long path names created
with GNU tar from
2002 can't
can NOT read / write data to NTFS
This probably does not answer any of your questions but the only way I found to
keep OS at NTFS is to reinstall it first to that partition. Then install the
open Solaris OS; its grub will pick back up that now nonactive boot layer. This
is a start over
Alan DuBoff al...@softorchestra.com wrote:
You picked a bad example. GNU tar has its own share
of problems. By
default no other achiever than GNU tar can unpack
long path names in
archives created by GNU tar.
Maybe I just got lucky...
[al...@eagle Documents]$ gtar zcvf ./test.tgz
A test with _short_ path names does not prove
anything - sorry.
Jörg,
WTF do I need to do then? I was told that you couldn't unarchive any long
filenames with another tar, that it wouldn't work.
Do I need to rub my tummy, while hopping around on one leg in a full moon?
Or do I need to do
Alan DuBoff al...@softorchestra.com wrote:
A test with _short_ path names does not prove
anything - sorry.
Jörg,
WTF do I need to do then? I was told that you couldn't unarchive any long
filenames with another tar, that it wouldn't work.
You did run a test with less than 100 chars
Josh
WTF, we can't even use the cough (Open)Solaris name.
Why don't we rename the organisation then? OGB should hold a contest
and community vote and then move all servers to the new name.
Well my vote is for (O pen S olars 1 edition) or OS1 for short.
--
This message posted from
You mean something like this?
Provide the best development platform possible. Provide full source access to
developers and users, including the ability to look at CVS tree changes
directly. Users can even look at our source tree and changes directly on the
web!
Integrate good code from any
IPS repositories are simply death because of speed and crazy lack of
applications because of stupid IP and patent issues which doesn't help
anything. They just cause slow or no development at all. And Oracle/Sun must be
in line with them.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
thanks and you're right did not answer the question.
Currently have 3 partitions. during install OSOL partition had to be named
solaris 2.
It installed itself there. With Mathias help, corrected boot loop problem
permanently.
My problem now is, OSOL will NOT recognize or mount the other two
IPS repositories are simply death because of speed
and crazy lack of applications because of stupid IP
and patent issues which doesn't help anything. They
just cause slow or no development at all. And
Oracle/Sun must be in line with them.
If you want Ubuntu with a Solaris kernel, use
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
[snip]
My impression is that a number of the AST tools have picked up the
major options previously unique to the GNU tools, while trying to retain
better standards compliance. Assuming that to be true, I think
13 matches
Mail list logo
