Re: [osol-discuss] Merge other distros to OpenIndiana?

2010-09-15 Thread Orvar Korvar
Ok, I understand your point. And it is cool with you being first with several things. I am only asking if all distros cooperated on one single distro, would it not be better if there was only one official community distro. It does not matter to people if it is Schillix or OpenIndiana, as long

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10,Oracle Solaris Express new license

2010-09-15 Thread Eric Andersen
2010/9/14 Gary gdri...@gmail.com: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Eric Andersen wrote: I concede that OS X was a poor example for the point I'm trying to make. Actually, it's a pretty fair comparison. Apple does not release their source to unregistered developers until after a

Re: [osol-discuss] Merge other distros to OpenIndiana?

2010-09-15 Thread Gary
On 9/14/10, Orvar Korvar wrote: I think OpenSolaris community is not really interested in umpteen different distros, as Linux has. Only one distro is acceptable to most people. I believe. But of course, people are free to disagree. :o) I think you're preaching to the choir here. Oracle has

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10,Oracle Solaris Express new license

2010-09-15 Thread Gary
On 9/14/10, Eric Andersen wrote: Whatever Apple does or doesn't do, the point I was trying to make was that a whole lot of people are willing to not only accept, but pay for an operating system that is closed source. A very large amount of OS X source code is open and freely available, so it

Re: [osol-discuss] Merge other distros to OpenIndiana?

2010-09-15 Thread Joerg Schilling
Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote: I am only asking if all distros cooperated on one single distro, would it not be better if there was only one official community distro. It does not matter to people if it is Schillix or OpenIndiana, as long as the distro attracts many

Re: [osol-discuss] Merge other distros to OpenIndiana?

2010-09-15 Thread Paul Kölle
Am 15.09.2010 08:55, schrieb Gary: On 9/14/10, Orvar Korvar wrote: I think OpenSolaris community is not really interested in umpteen different distros, as Linux has. Only one distro is acceptable to most people. I believe. But of course, people are free to disagree. :o) I think you're

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!

2010-09-15 Thread Daniel Kjar
Just downloaded and installed OIndi in virtualbox. Installed srss5, followed the instructions on the forums, added a couple of missing packages for dhcp and bang! it works great. Fantastic. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!

2010-09-15 Thread Alexander
I've just looked at it. It looks rather interesting. I've thought about migration from SXCE b97 to OpenSolaris 2010.x on our terminal (SRSS) servers. However, it didn't happen on obvious reason. Later we decided to wait for CentOS 6.0 and move there... It would allow us to use legacy SRSS

Re: [osol-discuss] Merge other distros to OpenIndiana?

2010-09-15 Thread Pavel Heimlich
Why dont some OpenSolaris distros join forces and work on OpenIndiana, and at a later point digress? Schillix, Nexenta, Milax, Korona, etc - wouldnt it be good if some projects merged with OpenIndiana? Korona is not a distro (ok, the definition of a distro has changed since the advent of

[osol-discuss] Anonymous NFS file permissions

2010-09-15 Thread valrh...@gmail.com
I am running NexentaStor 3.0.3-1 on a fileserver, and have it set up for CIFS and NFS access. I have three clients, running Win7, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and OSol B134 (will upgrade soon to OpenIndiana!). For the NFS machines, if I create a folder or file with Ubuntu (using just the standard NFS

Re: [osol-discuss] Anonymous NFS file permissions

2010-09-15 Thread Chris Mosetick
You need to set permissions on the file system properly. If you just want everyone to have access: zfs setsharenfs=name=chris,guestok=true tank/export/chris for CIFS zfs setsharesmb=name=chris,guestok=true tank/export/chris you should also look at idmap for cifs: read the manual first: man