On 12/10/11 4:20 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
I upgraded some time ago from solaris 11 express to solaris 11.0.
I have a gcc/gnu installation built from sources in a zone.
I've discovered that trying now to compile doesn't work any longer.
Typically, configure fails with a message seaming to
On 10/20/10 21:42, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
While I still like the idea of a runtime function (new syscall
or extension to mprotect()) to control default stack or heap
permissions (mainly for use with a preloadable shared object
to apply to existing binaries that don't have a spare program
On 10/20/10 3:39 AM, casper@sun.com wrote:
I had a few minutes today to try an experiment, and I'm afraid
the idea of having ld always generate a PT_SUNWSTACK is a non-starter.
The problem is that it overrides the behavior of 'set noexec_user_stack=1'
in /etc/system, and can
On 10/17/10 10:01, Ali Bahrami wrote:
I've had the same thought about having ld always generate
a PT_SUNWSTACK, and even sent some internal email yesterday
proposing it to my fellow linker alien. It's actually simpler
than what we do now, since we'd just remove the code that
checks the header
On 10/17/10 4:58 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
While it doesn't help existing binaries, would it be possible
to for new 32-bit binaries persuade the linker to issue a
redundant (same as ABI) PT_SUNWSTACK header? That I
suppose elfedit _would_ be able to change after-the-fact.
I gather one
On 10/16/10 08:54 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Doesn't help with existing binaries, but it's good to know for
when one can re-link. If there's a way to construct an
LD_PRELOAD'able shared object to do the trick for existing
binaries, I don't see how given the description of mprotect(2),
to
On 09/02/10 08:18, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 02/09/2010 12:30, Rob McMahon wrote:
Eric Andersen wrote:
If you want to build the official Oracle ON, I don't know. I think you need
access to closed bits of the OS.
If you want to move to the Illumos ON, there are instructions here (at least to
get
On 07/22/10 14:19, Paul Gress wrote:
On 07/22/10 04:35 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
See :
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sgs/packages/common/SUNWonld-README
Note that there is specific references to Solaris 8 and Solaris 10
update 10 and Nevada and even Solaris
Andre Lue wrote:
getting ld: fatal: file smartd.o: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 when trying to
build 64 bit versions of programs for most things where the 32 bit version builds fine.
gmake all-recursive
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/andre.l/smart/smartmontools-5.38'
Making all in .
On 07/11/10 07:40, Günther Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to make Sun's gcc-3.4.3 use the gnu linker instead of the
hard-wired Sun ld?
Günther
Hi Günther,
From reading the rest of this thread, I gather that the
GNU ld -x option is the problem.
-x
--discard-all
On 07/12/10 14:37, Günther Schmidt wrote:
Hi Ali,
as it turns out everything went fine, ie. the compilation of ghc
(6.10.4) succeeded without problems.
The configure script was already set to check whether ld understood the
-x option or not, but it chose the ld it found in the path, which was
On 07/12/10 15:00, Rainer Orth wrote:
Ali Bahramiali.bahr...@oracle.com writes:
It sounds like configure is using the wrong test.
Indeed, this is plain nonsense.
Rather than ask which ld is in the users path, it should
be asking which ld the compiler is configured to use. Of
course,
Dennis Clarke wrote:
ELF Header
ei_magic: { 0x7f, E, L, F }
ei_class: ELFCLASS32 ei_data: ELFDATA2LSB
ei_osabi: ELFOSABI_SOLARISei_abiversion: EAV_SUNW_CURRENT
e_machine: EM_386 e_version: EV_CURRENT
e_type: ET_EXEC
e_flags:
Jürgen Keil wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010, Jürgen Keil wrote:
[OpenSolaris Indiana: GNU?]
Well, it does have both the gnu utilities (/usr/gnu/bin)
and the solaris counterparts, and in the default setup
the /usr/gnu/bin directory is ahead of /usr/bin in $PATH.
I simply removed /usr/gnu/bin from
Pen-Yuan Hsing wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to compile and install the latest libiconv 1.13.1 (downloaded
directly from the official GNU site) on my installation of i386 OpenSolaris
2009.06.
1. [i]./configure --prefix=/usr/gnu --enable-shared --with-pic[/i]
2. [i]make[/i] ends with this error:
Harry Putnam wrote:
When I first started using opensolaris about a yr ago... some kind
soul here told me how to set things up so that emacs works like it
does on linux.
Not having to use Esc-x instead of M-x for example.. and so that
backspc does delete to the left... I don't recall if there
Roland Mainz wrote:
Umpf... the matching code is linked with -Bdirect ... AFAIK I can't
interpose library functions linked with this option, right ?
You could set LD_NODIRECT to defeat direct bindings --- see ld.so.1(1).
However, I agree with the thought that it would be easier to just
have a
Daniel Templeton wrote:
snip
2) Offer a single package that includes all the tuned libraries under a
sub-directory and provide a way to switch among them, such as the
modules command (which is on our list of things to port).
This sounds like a pretty good match for hardware
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is this expected or did I do something wrong:
Check ELF runtime attributes
./lib/amd64/libc.so.1: .SUNW_dynsymsort: duplicate 0x0015a500:
$dtrace30275.mutex_lock_kernel, mutex_lock_kernel
./lib/amd64/libc.so.1: .SUNW_dynsymsort: duplicate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, especially since both ps's are really the same program:
% ls -ilF /usr/bin/ps /usr/ucb/ps
198275 -r-xr-xr-x 71 root bin 8164 Jan 27 02:11 /usr/bin/ps*
198275 -r-xr-xr-x 71 root bin 8164 Jan 27 02:11 /usr/ucb/ps*
No, not really.
James Carlson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One particular annoyance of mine being that it is fairly easy to write a
single ps which does both ps -ef and ps uxga.
Not only easy to write, but that's the default on other OSes. (AIX
had that a decade or more ago. :-)
That's one of the
Sergio Enrique Schvezov wrote:
Maybe things have changed...
[i]Here at IBM Rational, we are not using OpenSolaris at all - we are tasked
with making things work on Solaris 10, not OpenSolaris. What external
version of Solaris 10 will have this linker fix, and in what expected
Akhilesh Mritunjai wrote:
Joerg,
I'm aware of the issue... but what I'm actually saying is that wouldn't it be
more consistent if gcc uses gld and sun cc uses sun ld ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
陶捷 Tao Jie wrote:
I don't know, but I've succeeded to build ON b66 with SS12 and it works
well now.
But it's a debug version. And as I've mentioned in the previous email, I
fail to Install the non-debug version.
2007/7/6, Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
陶捷 Tao Jie wrote:
snip
Check ELF runtime attributes
./lib/amd64/libelf.so.1: .SUNW_dynsymsort: duplicate 0x00023e38:
elf32_getehdr, _elf32_getehdr
./lib/amd64/libelf.so.1: .SUNW_dynsymsort: duplicate 0x000240c8:
_elf32_getphdr, elf32_getphdr
Madhusudhan Reddy wrote:
Thanks mph i have checked the values of ulimit for both process and
file...both are set as unlimited. As you have said that core might be
truncated.Actually i have seen this problem coming only a few times...why is
it so ? I have taken the output of truss and but i
26 matches
Mail list logo
