have a way of reproducing the problem, a bit of DTrace will
quickly turn up the reason. I assume it's only the 32 bit version
that is failing to fork, right?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You
you tell me how to do the same through a C program, please?
Thank you
I strongly recommend NOT doing this; instead, alter this behavior
on a per-program basis w/ pmadvise or /usr/lib/madv.so.1.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com
/hpcc/RandomAccess/
to be interesting reading...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
references through t_cpu _must_ be done with calling thread's
preemption disabled via kpreempt_disable() (a very fast macro);
this will allow your code to safely examine the details of it's
current CPU. Otherwise your code _will_ panic when doing
dynamic reconfiguration...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
him luck in his new role @Cisco, and we'll continue building a better
Solaris under different (but also familiar) management.
Nothing to see here folks; just business in the valley.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http
will be based on the
work done in OpenSolaris.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris-discuss
15-20MB/s.
What can I do to speed things up?
What filesystem on V480?
How is storage configued on your server?
How fast can you talk to the storage locally from the server?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http
as root...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
or more
advanced ECC.
Karel
I find their implicit assumption that filesystem code should
expect memory to be flaky to be quite dubious. I am tempted
to point out that ZFS doesn't also protect against CPU induced
errors or coding errors on the part of the application developer.
- Bart
--
Bart
and connect in at login on your workstation.
-Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris
w/ older releases w/o causing
problems.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
bart.smaald...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris
level of system.
* Reduction of change stream development costs (no patch scripts to
write!) offers easier opportunity to deliver tailored change streams
to Sun customers.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com
ffc0 40 kdebugseg
Jörg
Are you compiling w/ -xmodel=kernel ?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bart Smaalders bart.smaald...@sun.com wrote:
Mmm this still was not the right solution as the kernel linker now linked the
variable scsi_options which is physically in genunix at 0xfbc8a1f0
to address 0xf3b2733b inside my driver. As mentioned, the real
stephen bond wrote:
I partitioned as Harry described and still get the overlap error.
I have:
zpool will complain, because the backup partition overlaps all the
others. Use -f.
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6419310
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
?
How do you know this is the kernel?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris
to
the address range will not make the
system read from backing store (swap
space) until the page is modified
again.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com
to various processes awaits the VM2.0 project,
which is currently underway. Attempts to correctly schedule memory use
w/ the current VM system have been unsuccessful despite rather valiant
efforts.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
VM2.0? it's not the first time i've heard something like that, is
there any information about it?
http://osdir.com/ml/os.solaris.opensolaris.performance/2008-01/msg00024.html
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba
is badly designed, because that is what it is measuring.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird
libumem.so.1`umem_cache_alloc+0x19a
libumem.so.1`umem_alloc+0xcd
libumem.so.1`malloc+0x2a
libc_hwcap2.so.1`strdup+0x26
checking_strdup+0xf
retrieve_tree+0x343
main+0x5ed
_start+0x7d
...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
I would say there are many systems 32-bit only (and there is some
probability even 32-bit SPARC kernel will return).
This is absolutely not the case.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You
, but if present
the specified version is required.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird.
___
opensolaris
chmod doesn't are few and simple:
Everyone who is contributing to this email thread is encouraged to
make their opinions known via putbacks/pushes rather than email.
If the Solaris commands become a superset of the Gnu ones, then that
position becomes a fait accompli.
-= Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
a large team here at Sun tasked w/ this (or many other)
projects.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
ba...@cyber.eng.sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird
that new CPUs are added all the time so any CPU-specific tunings have
a very limited shelf-life.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird
UNIX admin wrote:
The question on the table is how we should go about
providing optimized
libraries for all reasonable chip sets.
Have you looked into isaexec(3C) (/usr/lib/isaexec)?
The applicability of isaexec to libraries is limited.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
be possible to make more progress with this problem
if you would tell everyone:
1) what sort of system you're running
2) where the shutdown is hanging, preferably w/ a stack trace.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com
gethrtime() to measure the time
interval. This is the approach we took w/ libmicro (see performance
community) and has worked reasonably well.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
be possible to offer
a release train containing periodic large scale change, interspersed
with small scale critical fixes.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
:-).
We are building the technology to make this possible.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Bart Smaalders wrote:
With the new packaging/software repository, we'll be able to update the
software on a machine by downloading the difference between where the
target machine and the desired end state. Using ZFS root, this will be
completely
Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Bart Smaalders wrote:
The likely outcome is that the change is file based, with file
equivalence determined by a file-type specific comparison/hash.
This allows us to handle cases where the file is alway different,
but semantically the same. Jar
release :)
Ian
Well, let's see what we can do w/ a new packaging system that lets us
upgrade Solaris easily see my latest blog entry on dim sum patching.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
a good chance.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
will get unloaded if
no process has it open. This can happen if you're using CDE...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
years old as of last month.
It was instantly obsolete in 1995, when Sun shipped the UltraSPARC 1.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss
of the
elephant, but it feels like it might have legs.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 6/12/07, Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNIX admin wrote:
Regarding the former, I see no reason not to include valgrind in
the Solaris multiverse, once the new packaging system kicks in.
Which new packaging system?
Several of us are actively
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 12/06/07, Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not yet the idea is likely to create a new packaging system
but leave the existing one in place for legacy applications/packages.
We're working on requirements, etc.
It'd be great to see that discussion happen
proposal together.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
entry to a new terminfo entry and use that when logging
in remotely.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
of its hurried
implementation (eg 2 jvms). This will not continue to be the case.
I think you'll find the system to be quite usable w/ 512MB, but
heavy users will want more to prevent paging...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED
you could tell us what kind of machine this is and
what version of Solaris you're running?
I found 3 hits on sun.com web pages using google
try this link:
http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/pdf/819-7981-11.pdf
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel
it make more sense to point someone at an hg server?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
night.
I'm looking forward to seeing this in OpenSolaris. I think the
automatic discovery methods (Rendezvous, SLP, SMB printing, etc)
will really make nomadic users a lot happier.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
So
Given the difficulties of incorporating the swt libraries needed
to make Azureus work on Solaris, what other BitTorrent client should
Solaris incorporate?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
satisfied, for example?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
think I've found my private
SPARC build machine :-).
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
aided by better tools.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Packages should represent a minimization boundary; e.g. they
are either installed or not installed depending on the
proposed use of the system.
Solaris has areas where packages are too fine-grained,
it also has areas where the packages are much too
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
method of adding elided Solaris packages during install of
his product...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
on demand?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Doug Scott wrote:
Bart Smaalders wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Hi,
On a box where Solaris has been freshly installed, one sees this
behavior.
-bash-3.00# useradd manoj
-bash-3.00# tail -1 /etc/passwd
manoj:x:100:1::/home/manoj:/bin/sh
-bash-3.00# mkdir /home/manoj
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Bart Smaalders wrote:
We really want our home directories today to always be /home/user
in /etc/passwd; that way things Just Work (TM) when we move from
host to host.
I agree that it makes a lot of sense to be consistent.
But hey, the installer, by default creates
I have seen a problem where a newer NVidia graphics card
would hard-hang with the nv driver (used during install
on older builds). This was with an 7900GT; the exact same
problem was also seen with Ubuntu. Works fine w/ the
Nvidia driver...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
platforms are you speaking of? Linux isn't POSIX compliant,
and most of the BSDs aren't. So which ones?
And in addition, which ones don't support minimization
to the point where multibyte locales are always present?
-= Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL
]
I'll second this; this seems like a fine idea.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the distinction between patching and upgrading
go away; package versioning needs to be implemented.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss
Take a look at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I. Szczesniak wrote:
/usr/bin/tr is one of the big problems in Solaris - the behaviour is
nonstandard and Sun declared long ago that fixes to support multibyte
locales are off limits because they would break backwards
compatibility.
So use the one in /usr/xpg4/bin.
- Bart
--
Bart
to call cplus_demangle from the signal handler; the mutex
is already held by the locking thread.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
a simple test case?
3) what does truss of the test case report?
4) have you followed the code:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libc/port/rt/mqueue.c#352
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Whether or not your SATA drives work depends on the chipset,
and whether or not that chipset also works in compatibility mode.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel
from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Are these 32 bit x86?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
), but
more then 64 bit will be making a difference there.
I would expect 4 drives that are capable of sustained 50 MB/sec
at the same time to yield ~120MB/sec in raidz (3+1) and
160MB/sec in straight stripping mode, based on previous experiences
and assuming adequate CPU.
- Bart
--
Bart
system. Import the pool by name on the new system and ZFS
will find the drives and assemble your data for you.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
.html
So a qualified +1 :-).
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
you know how fast the hardware will go.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Octave Orgeron wrote:
Hi,
purple/blue led's, lit sun logo, etc. It should be extremely quiet and
The lit Sun logo is one of the coolest things I like about the SB1000. :-)
It's the feature I love the most about my SB2k:)
That would be the glogo.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
contribution to the community.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
are by source file I guess?
Yes. There is code under many different licenses in OpenSolaris,
including CDDL (duh), GPL, LGPL, Apache, BSD, Mozilla, ...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
compilers.
{Open}Solaris will compile with either one, and I for one will
argue to keep it that way.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss
to another architectures, such as PPC
or strongarm or ...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
? How will your code cope with more sophisticated
processors a year from now?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
discover broadcasting MAC and Windows network
hosted printers and make them useable, and automatically/easily
setup print queues and advertise them to Macs and Windows clients,
it would truly be a huge step forward.
- Bart
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED
then?
Thanks
See the pwconv(1M) command; it does exactly what you want,
I think.
-= Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
to a safety valve - you may never need it, but should
things get tricky, you'll be glad you have it.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss
you expecting to happen?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
will not
cause the page to be unmapped, which is required to get
a segv.
If you mmap a file MAP_SHARED and someone ftruncates the
file, this can happen. It can also happen if your process
simply unmaps the space itself.
Pmap should indeed show the missing mapping.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders
is 1 second (internal
impl. detail).
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
like this will improve performance significantly,
esp. as networks increase in performance faster than single
cpu cores
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It seems to make sense to ship the compiler we use to build
the OS with the OS.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
-cleanup.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to run the stuff Sun ships
to make it easier for experts to run other code seems like exactly the
wrong set of tradeoffs.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
Team
Lori Alt, Noel Dellofano, Tabriz Leman, and Lin Ling
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+1... as a happy ZFS root user.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED
That's a weird one.
Is the /tmp filesystem mounted in single user mode? Do
these utilities rely on /tmp files?
You might add which version of Solaris and which hardware to
help us guess more accurately :-).
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of RAM, I don't think attempting to run ZFS in
minimal memory makes sense. Stick 1 GB of RAM in the machine and
be done w/ it.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
,
Roland
Take a look at /lib/svc/method/fs-root; that's what does the
mounting for libc.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
this on all sorts of hardware including dual core
machines. What kind of hardware are you seeing this on now?
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris
extremely difficult to use
correctly.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to be generally available.
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
