Re: [osol-discuss] New update of Solaris 11, how is it?

2011-10-06 Thread Michael Kerpan
Now that the full version of S11 is beginning to ship, will we finally see the long=promised code drop of new kernel code or has Oracle decided to permanently close off public access to post-Sun kernel developments? ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] Illumos loosing the SystemV heritage, fork (was: Re: Is anyone planning an alternative to Illumos or a fork?)

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Kerpan
Frankly, I don't see why none of the forks/sporks/distros floating around are looking at the modernized, more-featureful versions of the System V tools available from the Heirloom Tools project. IIRC, most of them are even CDDL-licensed (as OpenSolaris code was a starting point for most of them)

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!

2010-09-12 Thread Michael Kerpan
I just hope that OpenIndiana will intergrate the Heirloom tools rather than completely GNU-ifying the userland like Nexenta. Mike ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10,Oracle Solaris Express new license

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Kerpan
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote: It appears this is the license Solaris 11 Express wil be under and it's solaris 10 new license, an OTN lincese. http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6891-Licensing-Change-for-Solaris-10-and-Solaris-Cluster.html This

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris cancelled, to be replaced with Solaris 11 Express

2010-08-13 Thread Michael Kerpan
So, OpenSolaris is officially dead... They're no longer providing even read-only access to the live source code (only rare dumps of release products), no longer have any interest in community contribution and also reserve the right to maintain complete radio silence, as it were, on any new

Re: [osol-discuss] [distribution-discuss] Community distro

2010-07-16 Thread Michael Kerpan
Rather than all the negativity that's been going around, let's focus on the positive things: 1. We still have the code, including code that's MUCH more recent than the last public binary build. 2. There are companies like Nexenta that might be able to help maintain OpenSolaris, even if Oracle

Re: [osol-discuss] More negative press: Oracle maintains silence on OpenSolaris' future

2010-07-14 Thread Michael Kerpan
Frankly, I don't see why people are so upset about what's going on here. Why is the lack of an official binary release from Oracle such a big deal? The code is still available and seeing updates, although nobody seems to have been doing public build of those updates since 134... Why can't the

[osol-discuss] Why are so many adapter card drivers closed source?

2010-04-21 Thread Michael Kerpan
I was shocked to find that the drivers for all sorts of storage and network adapters (including for pretty standard stuff like the Adaptec Ultra320 SCSI cards and Broadcom wired network cards) that have been supported by open drivers in Linux and *BSD since more or less the beginning of time ;)

Re: [osol-discuss] Gosling resigns from Oracle

2010-04-12 Thread Michael Kerpan
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Jussi Nieminen jussiniemin...@gmail.com wrote: It is really sad to see and witness what is happening to Sun. I understand it very well when these former Sun employees are resigning one after another. Sun under Oracle is not the Sun we know. It doesn't exist

[osol-discuss] What's Going to Happen to OpenSolaris?

2010-01-27 Thread Michael Kerpan
Given that Oracle's acquisition of Sun is now all, for all practical purposes, a done deal, does anybody know what's going to happen to OpenSolaris? Oracle is not exactly known as being friendly to open source software and given that the SPARC+Solaris+Oracle stack is likely to be at the core of