James Carlson wrote:
Roland Mainz writes:
Beyond that point this issue it does not only affect Sun, it also
affects OpenSolaris and the related distributions which makes it a valid
email for this list.
It's perhaps worth noting that the ssh in Solaris is deliberately
SunSSH. Though it
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Felix Schulte wrote:
Yes. And Sun SSH is still vulnerable to X11keyboard sniffing. open
ssh has untrusted X11 forwarding for that - Sun SSH does not.
And how many people use it?
No clue. But it makes sense in some environments. And it's not
openssh.org's or
Roland Mainz writes:
Beyond that point this issue it does not only affect Sun, it also
affects OpenSolaris and the related distributions which makes it a valid
email for this list.
It's perhaps worth noting that the ssh in Solaris is deliberately
SunSSH. Though it is a derivative of OpenSSH,
On 3/27/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Mainz writes:
Beyond that point this issue it does not only affect Sun, it also
affects OpenSolaris and the related distributions which makes it a valid
email for this list.
It's perhaps worth noting that the ssh in Solaris is
Dennis Clarke wrote:
There .. see that ? The remote rev is Sun_SSH_1.1 and not OpenSSH.
If I drop the cipher length to aes128-cbc then I see this :
$ ssh -2 -4 -e\^ -l dclarke -c aes128-cbc -v 192.168.35.123
That is because this was designed (aka HACKED ON) for the Solaris
binary product.
Hello,
Please understand that this is a mailing list.
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=7083tstart=0
While your request is much more well thought out than the previous one
today, I suggest you send your requests for donation to the appropriate
entities. I don't believe a
