On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:53:00AM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Not a grant of copyright, but clause #3 reads:
You hereby grant to Sun, and to any party who receives Your Contribution,
a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, worldwide, no-charge, royalty-free,
license under any patents
- Original Message
From: Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's Sun's wording, so I think that someone from Sun could probably make
the intent here crystal clear and possibly reword the thing to make it
clear in future versions of the agreement, as it happens.
I don't intend to pay for
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:19:20PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:43:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
Again, I don't agree with your interpretation. However, if you wish to
pursue this further, I suggest
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet, if you really care about the legal interpretation of an
agreement, you will always seek legal council. Sun is not the only
organisation to have an open source project that requires joint
copyright attribution. The Free Software Foundation and many
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I will
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:43:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:43:14PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 25/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu,
On 20/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I will also
grant an irrevocable license to everyone who receives my
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I will also
grant an irrevocable license to everyone who receives my contribution
to do whatever they like with it, and that
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 13:23 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Am I correct in my interpretation that, had I signed this agreement,
that would include this email? Does mail on an OpenSolaris mailing list
constitute a submission to a Project?
I'm not a lawyer, but ...
I'd think that the act of
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:22:24AM -0400, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 13:23 +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
Am I correct in my interpretation that, had I signed this agreement,
that would include this email? Does mail on an OpenSolaris mailing list
constitute a submission to a
On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I will also
grant an irrevocable license to everyone who receives my contribution
to do whatever they like with it, and that presumably includes any patch
that I may post to an OpenSolaris
13 matches
Mail list logo
