Re: [osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-13 Thread Michal Cerbak
Hi Rick, This blog article answers some of your questions: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/a_field_guide_to_zones Rick S. wrote: Hi all. I come from the "Real Solaris" world, been working with Solaris 10 for about 3 years now, and decided to give OpenSoalaris a place on my home server vice Soal

Re: [osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-12 Thread Shawn Walker
Dave Miner wrote: Note that the transfer sizes displayed by pkg are compressed size, so you actually got closer to 150 MB of executables and so on, which is more accurate for comparison purposes vs. the old native zones. We fixed that; that shouldn't be true as of several builds ago. Cheers,

Re: [osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-12 Thread Dave Miner
Rick S. wrote: Hi all. I come from the "Real Solaris" world, been working with Solaris 10 for about 3 years now, and decided to give OpenSoalaris a place on my home server vice Soalris 10 x86. I think I'm missing something here, on Solaris 10 when I create a 'full' root zone, it copies over 1

Re: [osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-11 Thread Ché Kristo
A lot of the cruft has either been removed intentionally to fit onto CD size distribution or because the component is not redistributable... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris

[osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-11 Thread Rick S.
Hi all. I come from the "Real Solaris" world, been working with Solaris 10 for about 3 years now, and decided to give OpenSoalaris a place on my home server vice Soalris 10 x86. I think I'm missing something here, on Solaris 10 when I create a 'full' root zone, it copies over 100,000's of file