Erast Benson wrote:
Very good point and a right concern (to some degree) IMHO...
As J.S. mentioned before, in the future we should expect at least 2
types of OpenSolaris-based distros:
a) GNU-centric, those who trying to re-use GNU/Linux as much as possible
b) Solaris-centric, those who
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 19:47, Joerg Schilling wrote:
GNU The youngest set of tools (starting around 1986).
My current idea is to put them into /usr/sps/* as Linux
users may expect them in the same hierarchy as the rest of
free software. It may
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very true. dpkg's alternatives is a good thing. Also there are other
ways to achive that, i.e. playing with execv() for instance.
Did you hack libc to do this?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 18:36 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very true. dpkg's alternatives is a good thing. Also there are other
ways to achive that, i.e. playing with execv() for instance.
Did you hack libc to do this?
No. not yet. But at least we've
What concerns me about the ramifications of Sun having an OpenSolaris
and the subsequent distro's that will, or have come out, is that
Forking and eventually all the stuff I hate about modern linux will
plague OpenSolaris.
Nexenta is the one I am most excited about and it runs fine on my
other PC
Very good point and a right concern (to some degree) IMHO...
As J.S. mentioned before, in the future we should expect at least 2
types of OpenSolaris-based distros:
a) GNU-centric, those who trying to re-use GNU/Linux as much as possible
b) Solaris-centric, those who trying to mimic Solaris as
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good point and a right concern (to some degree) IMHO...
As J.S. mentioned before, in the future we should expect at least 2
types of OpenSolaris-based distros:
a) GNU-centric, those who trying to re-use GNU/Linux as much as possible
b)
Joerg Schilling wrote:
- The current hierarchy on Sun Solaris is just using a planless
aggregation of free software on various places. There is no reason
why GNOME related programs (that are completely useless without X
that could modify the PATH) made it into /usr/bin while
On 11/15/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good point and a right concern (to some degree) IMHO...
As J.S. mentioned before, in the future we should expect at least 2
types of OpenSolaris-based distros:
a) GNU-centric, those who
Quoting from http://www.linuxbase.org/policy/charter.html:
The mission of the LSB is to develop and promote a set of specifications that
will increase compatibility among Linux distributions and enable conforming
software applications to run on any compliant system. In addition, the LSB will
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 11:26 -0600, David Schanen wrote:
On 11/15/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good point and a right concern (to some degree) IMHO...
As J.S. mentioned before, in the future we should expect at least 2
types
11 matches
Mail list logo
