so youngsters??
For a hardcore OpenSolaris user who uses nothing but and who has to
constantly consult the userguides, not being able to read them is a major
impediment.
Freedom is not cherished until it's lost. Now I am free, again, not to use
anything else!
As someone else mentioned in a
I have cleaned up the original pdf file. Please see:
http://tinyurl.com/zfs-pdf
The invisible parts (original) are now visible (corrected).
It is not too difficult a job.
Just wish that we can be more thoughtful.
The only people affected are us hard-core OpenSolaris users.
--
This message
so youngsters??
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This is a freetype problem, and such problems can
impact anything. Nevada builds are anything but
lightly tested developer snapshots. They didn't
even introduce the problem - freetype folks did!
Hi Akhilesh,
Me again. I understand this can be blamed as a freetype problem, but it is
really
Just realized that with all my innuendos and wild suggestions, I failed to
comment on the quality of the documents themselves.
This issue is particularly worth mentioning because (I don't know about you
but) I am very impressed with the quality, especially readability, of Sun's new
generation
Hi Waynel
Please don't get me wrong. I myself am responsible
for driving openoffice adoption at my work place. I
myself have gone from wordstar to word perfect (5.02)
to word and then I used star office before openoffice
existed. But because I have also worked with
documentation team, I
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Hi Waynel
Please don't get me wrong. I myself am responsible
for driving openoffice adoption at my work place. I
myself have gone from wordstar to word perfect (5.02)
to word and then I used star office before openoffice
existed. But because I have also worked with
Please read Akhilesh's answer carefully and stop
repeating
the same thing. Staroffice is to Latex/Framemaker
what a
mid-size sedan is to an 18-wheeler. To the untrained
eye,
they appear to perform similar actions, but the
actual overlap
is really small.
Sorry, can't help it. :-)
I don't doubt the superiority of LaTex/Framemaker in
conjunction with Distiller in producing (the pdf
versions of) nicely typeset books and brochures. But
how good is a tool if it produces a product that its
intended users can NOT read? This is what prompted
You seem to have missed the
I don't doubt the superiority of LaTex/Framemaker
in
conjunction with Distiller in producing (the pdf
versions of) nicely typeset books and brochures.
But
how good is a tool if it produces a product that
its
intended users can NOT read? This is what prompted
You seem to have
And I don't like
it a bit; it is very good in generating documents
for documentation purposes but IMO it often causes
the authors to loose human touch.
loose should be --lose--. The choice of the writing tool (in this case, the
Jive) strongly affects how one writes. I don't like Jive, and
Hi Waynel
Please don't get me wrong. I myself am responsible for driving openoffice
adoption at my work place. I myself have gone from wordstar to word perfect
(5.02) to word and then I used star office before openoffice existed. But
because I have also worked with documentation team, I have
12 matches
Mail list logo
