According to OpenGroup's website, Solaris 10 for x86_64 systems was never
registered with the OpenGroup for Unix 03 certification. No version of
OpenSolaris has been registered, either.
Has Sun broken compliance with some of the terms of the Single Unix
Specification during the transition to
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/brand3493.htm
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:53 AM, M. Oliver Ghingold mega...@gmail.com wrote:
According to OpenGroup's website, Solaris 10 for x86_64 systems was never
registered with the OpenGroup for Unix 03 certification. No version of
OpenSolaris
Ah. My mistake. One question down, one to go.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
M. Oliver Ghingold wrote:
If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup?
The certification and registration process is time consuming and expensive.
Sun has traditionally only done this for full releases of Solaris, such as
the initial releases of Solaris 7, 8, 9, and 10,
M. Oliver Ghingold wrote:
If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup?
The certification and registration process is time consuming and
expensive.
how expensive ? Are we talking internal costs and infrastructure or a fee?
Is this $10K or $10M ?
Dennis
Dennis Clarke wrote:
M. Oliver Ghingold wrote:
If not, why hasn't OpenSolaris been registered with the OpenGroup?
The certification and registration process is time consuming and
expensive.
how expensive ? Are we talking internal costs and infrastructure or a fee?
Is this
