Hi swalker,
It should be possible to combine OpenPKG with apt-get
(apt4rpm) as well.
Are you using apt4rpm with Solaris 10 and OpenPKG?
Having some trouble getting it compiled. Are there any other alternatives?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Glenn Lagasse wrote:
The big difference though is that the cost of entry
for customization /
maintaining current status is a lot lower on Linux,
just because you get
the source packages. There's a lot less effort in,
say, changing your
distro's mysql-4.0.src.rpm to
I'm a tech writer at Sun. I'm going to review this
information and get
back to you about adding this procedure to the
docs.sun.com documentation.
I'd be interested in any feedback and suggestions you could provide on
improving the article.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I don't see anything in rpm that could not be handled
via the pre and
postinstall scripts that are part of a SVR4 package.
Or a Makefile processed by `make` in a pre/postinstall phase of package
installation. Which is what you're basically saying, correct?
This message posted from
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 13:45, Jasse Jansson wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:26 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
1. you patch the source code if necessary
Is there a 'recommended' format for patches in the Solaris environment?
patches to what ?
If you are talking about Solaris the binary product then
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 13:45, Jasse Jansson wrote:
On Jul 20, 2005, at 10:26 PM, UNIX admin wrote:
1. you patch the source code if necessary
Is there a 'recommended' format for patches in the Solaris
environment?
patches to
Jasse Jansson wrote:
and to apply the patch:
patch -i patch_file file_to_be_patched
or is there some other tricks that I should be aware of?
I usually use gpatch (included in Solaris) instead of patch, because
patch follows some obscure standard that breaks in subtle ways on some
Thats what the SUNWmysqlS package is for, it is
is there a rationale behind such names? I mean why not 'mysql', which is a nice
name given by the writer of the source of pkg? what is this company ticker
concept useful for?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Sunil wrote:
Thats what the SUNWmysqlS package is for, it is
is there a rationale behind such names? I mean why not 'mysql', which is a nice
name given by the writer of the source of pkg? what is this company ticker
concept useful for?
They key thing is not to get two packages w/ the same
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 20:19, Sunil wrote:
Thats what the SUNWmysqlS package is for, it is
is there a rationale behind such names? I mean why not 'mysql', which is a
nice name
given by the writer of the source of pkg? what is this company ticker concept
useful for?
there is no central
On 7/20/05, Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They key thing is not to get two packages w/ the same name... and
using the ticker symbol of the originating company helps prevent that.
It's just a way of partitioning the name space that lines up well w/
organizational boundaries...
Is
11 matches
Mail list logo
