Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] said
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Paul Walsh wrote:
I remember being told by the tutor on a Solaris SysAdmin course to
always choose Entire distribution + OEM support Nowadays I'm not so
I think that's very poor advice.
In general, this is good advice...
It
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0100, Peter C. Tribble wrote:
Why on earth does gnome/jds come in 200 odd separate packages? Does the
split of files make any sense?
It does, but it's reasonably arcane, and like Casper said, it suffers
greatly from the lack of good tools to manage it.
Each
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 12:20:21AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a good reason, though, to make GNOME more than five
packages? As long as we don't do RPM style patches, who would install
only M out of N GNOME packages (not to pick on GNOME, we all offend here).
What model
On 7/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really a good reason, though, to make GNOME more than five
packages? As long as we don't do RPM style patches, who would install
only M out of N GNOME packages (not to pick on GNOME, we all offend here).
From an end user
