Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-13 Thread Ghee Teo
Stephen Hahn wrote: * Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-12 13:16]: Simon Phipps wrote: I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now, maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-13 Thread Glynn Foster
Hey, Stephen Hahn wrote: Core Contributors, the only voting member class, are proposed by each Community Group. As such, Community Groups like Marketing are permitted (and expected) to have different criteria Sorry to be devil's advocate here, but is that really such a good thing?

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-12 Thread Bill Rushmore
Simon Phipps wrote: On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote: I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living writing software for the

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-12 Thread Simon Phipps
On Feb 12, 2007, at 05:58, Bill Rushmore wrote: Simon Phipps wrote: On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote: I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-12 Thread Stephen Lau
Bill Rushmore wrote: Simon Phipps wrote: On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote: I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-12 Thread Ghee Teo
Simon Phipps wrote: I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now, maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an opensolaris-core list perhaps, a place for substantive discussion of issues facing the

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-12 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-12 13:16]: Simon Phipps wrote: I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now, maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an opensolaris-core list perhaps, a

[osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-11 Thread Bill Rushmore
De Togni Giacomo wrote: [i]The discussion should be held in the widest possible forum, which to me looks like opensolaris-discuss[/i] Good for widest possible forum but if generic (like opensolaris-discuss) it could be problematic.The licenses issues are not generic but specific issues.So,a

Re: [osol-discuss] Request a new Community for License Discussion (was CAB/OGB Position Paper # 20070207)

2007-02-11 Thread Simon Phipps
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote: I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living writing software for the platform the