Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-12 13:16]:
Simon Phipps wrote:
I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now,
maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by
Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an
Hey,
Stephen Hahn wrote:
Core Contributors, the only voting member class, are proposed by each
Community Group. As such, Community Groups like Marketing are
permitted (and expected) to have different criteria
Sorry to be devil's advocate here, but is that really such a good thing?
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use
the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living writing
software for the
On Feb 12, 2007, at 05:58, Bill Rushmore wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to
use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own
Bill Rushmore wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to use
the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living
Simon Phipps wrote:
I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now,
maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by
Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an opensolaris-core
list perhaps, a place for substantive discussion of issues facing the
* Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-12 13:16]:
Simon Phipps wrote:
I'd suggest that, as we have a member-based system emerging right now,
maybe we should have a list as Roy suggests that's writable only by
Core Contributors (readable by all). Time for an opensolaris-core
list perhaps, a
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
[i]The discussion should be held
in the widest possible forum, which to me looks like
opensolaris-discuss[/i]
Good for widest possible forum but if generic (like opensolaris-discuss) it
could be problematic.The licenses issues are not generic but specific
issues.So,a
On Feb 11, 2007, at 13:28, Bill Rushmore wrote:
I totally agree Giacomo. As much as I have tried, I just can't
interested in the licensing discussions. As someone who wants to
use the fruits of OpenSolaris for my own use and to make a living
writing software for the platform the