Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked onSolarisx86machine

2007-12-26 Thread Frank Hofmann
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 6:36 PM > To: Vamsee Priya > Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked > onSolarisx86machine

Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked onSolarisx86machine

2007-12-26 Thread Vamsee Priya
ginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 6:36 PM To: Vamsee Priya Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked onSolarisx86machine >This is th

Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked onSolarisx86machine

2007-12-26 Thread Casper . Dik
>This is the o/p I get with umem_status when I attach mdb to the process >running. > >Status: ready and active >Concurrency:0 >Logs: (inactive) >Message buffer: >umem allocator: redzone violation: write past end of buffer >buffer=80c7c68 bufctl=80c8ce8 cache: umem_alloc_80

Re: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked onSolarisx86machine

2007-12-26 Thread Vamsee Priya
6:20 PM To: Vamsee Priya Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: RE: [osol-discuss] SIGSEGV in libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked onSolarisx86machine On Wed, 26 Dec 2007, Vamsee Priya wrote: > Hi > Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with