Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-04-01 Thread dmpk2k
It would be nice if something was done about the current syslog. The last time I used it for centralized logging, things didn't quite turn out like I hoped. Solaris' syslog is limited, delicate, and only supports UDP. Also, I found a bug where the workaround was in an email from 1994 or 1996.

[osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
Saw someone in opensolaris-help having trouble building syslog-ng, and it got me to wondering why that hasn't been integrated (perhaps with any changes needed to support doors rather than a Unix domain socket for local communication). AFAIK, the existing syslog has a lot less functionality.

Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Casper . Dik
Saw someone in opensolaris-help having trouble building syslog-ng, and it got me to wondering why that hasn't been integrated (perhaps with any changes needed to support doors rather than a Unix domain socket for local communication). AFAIK, the existing syslog has a lot less functionality.

Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Alan Coopersmith
casper@sun.com wrote: Clearly syslog-ng needs to be able to pick up such messages *and* create a door where it can say yes, I'm still running. Wouldn't it be better to use SMF for that now instead of a custom door solution for just that one service? -- -Alan Coopersmith-

Re: [osol-discuss] syslog-ng?

2010-03-31 Thread Casper . Dik
casper@sun.com wrote: Clearly syslog-ng needs to be able to pick up such messages *and* create a door where it can say yes, I'm still running. Wouldn't it be better to use SMF for that now instead of a custom door solution for just that one service? Considering that we need to call that

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2010-01-05 Thread Predrag Zecevic
I was able to compile and install it using http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/ a) Install SFE environment and build pkgtool and cd /path/to/build/of/packages/spec-files-extra.2009116 b) pkgtool build-only --svr4 --download --autodeps --interactive SFEeventlog.spec (build-only, because installation

[osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Eugene Vilensky
Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? If I were to build it, is there an easy metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debian's build-essential metapackage? Thanks! -Eugene

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Mike Gerdts
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky evilen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise?  If I were to build it, is there an easy metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debian's

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Casper . Dik
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky evilen...@gmail.com= wrote: Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? = =A0If I were to build it, is there an easy metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debia= n's

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Gary Gendel
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Eugene Vilensky evilen...@gmail.com= wrote: Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? = =A0If I were to build it, is there an easy metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Casper . Dik
Solaris Syslog doesn't log using a door. Solaris logs on /dev/conslog but uses the door only to determine if the syslogd is running. Casper I always wondered at the sanity of using a door for this purpose. My biggest problem with the code is that syslogd_ok() is always called, even

Re: [osol-discuss] Syslog-ng?

2009-12-07 Thread Rob McMahon
On 07/12/2009 14:34, Eugene Vilensky wrote: Hi, Is syslog-ng available for OpenSolaris, through IPS or otherwise? If I were to build it, is there an easy metapackage for the build system, maybe analogous to Red Hat's rpmbuild+dependencies or Debian's build-essential metapackage? I'm