Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was originally created
Agreed.
during the Pilot program, when there was a single consolidation and a
lot fewer people. When I proposed it, I thought of it as a stopgap
measure to deal
* Eric Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-17 11:21]:
Al Hopper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was originally created
Agreed.
during the Pilot program, when there was a single consolidation and a
lot fewer people. When I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Someone on the infrastructure team can develop a public procedure for
shutting down a list. This procedure will then get OGB blessing, and
be carried out for each of the above lists. I'd also be happy to see
draft process submissions
* Ignacio Marambio Cat?n [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-17 12:04]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Someone on the infrastructure team can develop a public procedure for
shutting down a list. This procedure will then get OGB blessing, and
be carried out for each of
sch == Stephen Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sch I think I would like to hear about how to eventually close some
sch of the program-wide aliases, as consolidations and communities
sch evolve their own code submission discussions.
I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
sch == Stephen Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sch I think I would like to hear about how to eventually close some
sch of the program-wide aliases, as consolidations and communities
sch evolve their own code submission discussions.
I think
