snip
My take is this, I read all the 300+ messages posted at Slashdot, and found it
amazing that one could surmise what Oracle may or may not do wrt one of its
most important assets without seriously entering Chairman Larry into the
equation. (As we all know, Chairman Larry owns about one
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short article on Phronix about the
not-so-bright future of OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit weak
on real content--still something about OpenSolaris made it on slashdot:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:08 -0500, Michael Lee mle...@gmail.com wrote:
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short article on Phronix about the
not-so-bright future of OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit weak
on real content--still something about OpenSolaris made it on
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:51:20 -0500, Paul Griffith pa...@cse.yorku.ca wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:08 -0500, Michael Lee mle...@gmail.com wrote:
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short article on Phronix about the
not-so-bright future of OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is
slashdot and osnews is more in favour of linux than anything. I think opensol
discussion groups are best for opensolaris news than these external websites.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:34:08 -0500, Michael Lee
mle...@gmail.com wrote:
Ultimately the slashdot link points to a short
article on Phronix about the not-so-bright future of
OpenSolaris at Oracle, albeit the article is a bit
weak on real content--still something about
OpenSolaris made it
On 02/24/10 05:17 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Yeah, when the news doesn't fit our liking, we can always discredit the source.
:-)
I thought the same thing, just a little differently. The Opensolaris
mail exploders can be viewed to be biased towards Opensolaris.
Having said that,
