Pardon me for asking what might be obvious to others but is not to me;
why are folks upgrading production systems to Solaris Express
regardless of version? If you plan to use Xvm until Solaris 11 ships
with or without a replacement for it, why are you "upgrading" these
systems in the first place? I
Upgraded to solaris 11 express.
No problem at all during upgrade (postgresql service destroyed though, but that
was expected ;-))
keyboard english after upgrad, had to modify keymap:default service def
compiz doesn't start automatically (?) but works if selected from gui
Xend doesn't start after
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:18:13PM -0800, Muhammed Syyid wrote:
> Is there any specifics somewhere about what the known issues are? I'm
> currently on OSOL 126 (have been holding back primarily because of xvm)
>
> On a tangential note, what does OpenIndiana use for VM (I read that it
> doesn't s
Is there any specifics somewhere about what the known issues are? I'm currently
on OSOL 126 (have been holding back primarily because of xvm)
On a tangential note, what does OpenIndiana use for VM (I read that it doesn't
support xvm but does it support kvm instead or something else?)
--
This me
IMHO this is glorious news! I plan to immediately contact my account manager,
retract the scathing words I had said, and find out the future and if the
future is bright we will resume testing to augment (maybe someday replace) ESX.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
laris specific examples of that in the
VirtualBox documentation, but it's not too hard to figure out.
Lastest stuff available at www.virtualbox.org
Joe
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:50:58 +0100 (CET)
> From: Bruno Damour
> To: david comay
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express
l -
De: "david comay"
À: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 17 Novembre 2010 07h41:21 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express and xvm
> Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 expr
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom0 ?
Yes, the xVM packages are still present in 2010.11 although there are
known issues with them. And though the packages are there and I can't
speak to the dom0 roadmap, I should point out the following approved
ARC case from
On 11/17/10 05:23 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we ar
On 11/16/2010 8:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that
it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through remova
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it
will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are
some
major r
scuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tue, November 16, 2010 9:39:37 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express and xvm
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Kent Watsen wrote:
>
>> * if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
>>also be in So
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are some
major removals yet to come. (I don't know
Kent Watsen wrote:
> * if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
> also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are some
major removals yet to come. (I don't know about Dom0 specifically, just
the case in general.)
--
On 11/17/10 03:17 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
On 11/16/2010 3:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
The 32-bit dom0 hypervisor has been removed, per the release notes:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/fbdtw?l=en&a=view
Other details regarding xvm usage can be
On 11/16/2010 3:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom0 ?
That would be a huge benefit for me, cu
19 matches
Mail list logo
