Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not report Operating System's mode
correctly (32 or 64 bit).
Why not be use SI_ARCHITECTURE_K instead of SI_ARCHITECTURE for -p flag (-m?)
in uname code?
After changing this I tested uname on usual 32bit PC and on my Toshiba A300
laptop, which cpu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Alexander Eremin ere...@milax.org wrote:
Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not report Operating System's mode
correctly (32 or 64 bit).
Why not be use SI_ARCHITECTURE_K instead of SI_ARCHITECTURE for -p flag
(-m?) in uname code?
After changing
Alexander Eremin wrote:
Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not report Operating System's mode
correctly (32 or 64 bit).
It's not supposed to:
-mPrints the machine hardware name (class).
Use of this option is discouraged. Use
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Alexander Eremin wrote:
Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not report Operating System's mode
correctly (32 or 64 bit).
It's not supposed to:
-m Prints the machine hardware name
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Alexander Eremin wrote:
Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not report Operating System's
mode correctly (32 or 64 bit).
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Even on 2009.06_b111:
mar...@opensolaris:~$ uname -m
i86pc
mar...@opensolaris:~$ uname -p
i386
mar...@opensolaris:~$ uname -a
SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_111 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
mar...@opensolaris:~$ arch -k
i86pc
mar...@opensolaris:~$ isainfo -k
amd64
---
Alexander Eremin wrote:
Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not
report Operating System's mode correctly (32 or 64
bit).
It's not supposed to:
-mPrints the machine hardware
name (class).
Use of this option is
discouraged. Use
uname -p instead.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Even on 2009.06_b111:
mar...@opensolaris:~$ uname -m
i86pc
mar...@opensolaris:~$ uname -p
i386
mar...@opensolaris:~$ uname -a
SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_111 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
From: Alexander Eremin ere...@milax.org
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:35:26 AM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] uname -a ... 32bit vs 64bit
Alexander Eremin wrote:
Hi,
I see now it's a bug 2820 Uname -m does not
report Operating System's mode
Octave Orgeron writes:
Now putting all that info into uname would just complicate life for everyone
and break all sorts of stuff. As such, uname is for very high-level info and
isainfo is for detailed.
Exactly. Putting detailed processor information into uname is not
only unnecessary, but
Octave Orgeron writes:
Now putting all that info into uname would just complicate life for
everyone and break all sorts of stuff. As such, uname is for very
high-level info and isainfo is for detailed.
Exactly. Putting detailed processor information into uname is not
only unnecessary, but
style type=text/css
P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
/style
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
div dir=ltrfont face=Tahoma color=#00
size=2When I run quot;uname -aquot; it
says:/font/div
div dir=ltrfont face=tahoma size=2SunOS
hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386
Also: I personally don't understand why Sun made that design decision
back in 1997/98 to treat a booted 32bit kernel and booted 64bit kernel
as the same platform, and hence to identify it with the same uname()
field values. In this case I prefer how linux handles it.
Why? In that time you
Also: I personally don't understand why Sun made that
design decision
back in 1997/98 to treat a booted 32bit kernel and
booted 64bit kernel
as the same platform, and hence to identify it with
the same uname()
field values. In this case I prefer how linux handles
it.
Why? It makes perfect
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've
also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says nothing, so I'm
left confused.
How can I know if my system is 64bit or 32bit
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And
I've also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says
nothing, so I'm left confused.
How can I know if
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've
also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've
also seen it say 32bi
t when you're 32bit. But now it says nothing, so I'm left confused.
How can I know if my system is 64bit or
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
How can I know if my system is 64bit or 32bit anymore?
The best way is probably 'isainfo':
kootenay[19]% isainfo
amd64 i386
kootenay[22]% isainfo -v
64-bit amd64 applications
sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc
cx8 tsc
fpu
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've
also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it
Thank you. That's perfect.
From: Shawn Walker [swal...@opensolaris.org]
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 2:08 PM
To: Edward Ned Harvey
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] uname -a ... 32bit vs 64bit
Edward Ned Harvey wrote
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And
I've also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says
nothing, so I'm left confused.
Solaris uname
Hi Ed,
isainfo tool might help you.
$ isainfo
amd64 i386
$ isainfo -v
64-bit amd64 applications
ahf sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov
amd_sysc
cx8 tsc fpu
32-bit i386 applications
ahf sse3 sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov
Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
When I run uname -a it says:
SunOS hostname 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit. And I've
also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says nothing, so I'm
left
In the past, I've seen the system say x86_64 when you're 64bit.
And I've also seen it say 32bit when you're 32bit. But now it says
nothing, so I'm left confused.
So you have not been on Solaris in the past.
I was confused by the bootup kernel messages. The kernel message when you
boot
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Edward Ned Harvey sola...@nedharvey.com wrote:
I was confused by the bootup kernel messages. The kernel message when you
boot from DVD says 32bit. The kernel message booting from hard drive (I
think) says x86_64. Both messages I see regularly, and look similar
26 matches
Mail list logo
