On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 23:56, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Dennis == Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dennis So then .. it looks like the old way of pkgrm packages is going
Dennis away and a new prodreg uninstall process is here now?
The last I heard, Solaris packages (pkgadd, etc.) are in no
Hey,
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 21:43 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Out of curiousity, anyone keeping track of what Ubuntu have done to
become the Linux distribution of choice? ...
Money? Mark Shuttleworth's that is.
(Sound's cynical, but big-time funding gives any project a huge advantage.)
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Anup Sekhar wrote:
Sean Sprague wrote on 01/30/06 23:16:
Hey Jim,
Just a very small point wrt:
Naming Services Community
* Proposed 1/20/06 by Anup Sekhar
* Community consensus: yes
* CAB vote: no +/- vote yet
* Opening date: not currently scheduled
On
vijayanand writes:
Can anyone let me know whether there is any limitaion on the number
of Logical Units/Ip address that can be association with a single
network physical interface.
Yes. The limit is set by the ip_addrs_per_if ndd variable. The
default limit is 256, but can be increased to
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:40, Al Hopper wrote:
Perhaps Name Services could exist as a project, rather than as a community.
My concern, at this time, is the proliferation of OpenSolaris Communities,
and this is why I'm reluctant to form one more.
I disagree on this one.
There are man projects
On 2/1/06, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 23:56, Mike Kupfer wrote:
Dennis == Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dennis So then .. it looks like the old way of pkgrm packages is going
Dennis away and a new prodreg uninstall process is here now?
Just a reminder that the Expert Exchange is happening this morning.
Sara
__
You can hear Jim Grisanzio, Rich Teer, Al Hopper, Dan Price, Liane Praza, and Sun legal representative Cliff Allen in an Expert Exchange (read: Live QA) on Wednesday, February 1, from 10-11:00 AM
Dennis Clarke wrote:
If I can issue one command to remove Sun ONE Studio 10 as opposed to
30 then its a good thing.
I'll simply read the man page.
Or look at http://docs.sun.com/source/819-0485/remove.html :)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Jake Maciejewski wrote:
Nvidia provides Solaris drivers (do you still have to hack the PCI ID?)
Not in the current release version (unless you buy a video card newer than
the driver).
but unless I'm missing something, ATI barely supports Linux much less Solaris
(would open source drivers
Eric Boutilier wrote
Glynn Foster wrote:
Out of curiousity, anyone keeping track of what Ubuntu have done to
become the Linux distribution of choice? ...
Money? Mark Shuttleworth's that is.
(Sound's cynical, but big-time funding gives any project a huge advantage.)
Sorry. I
Sara Dornsife wrote:
Just a reminder that the Expert Exchange is happening this morning.
Sara
__
You can hear Jim Grisanzio, Rich Teer, Al Hopper, Dan Price, Liane
Praza, and Sun legal representative Cliff Allen in an Expert Exchange
(read: Live QA) on Wednesday, February 1,
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 20:49 -0300, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
The last part of the puzzle are little projects like roseta, they make
those users without programming skills feel like they are usefull to the
community while saving the tedious work of for example translating to a
new language
Just ot of interest - can you tell me which version of Linux you are running
VMWare on, and how you set it up? I use VMWare for testing Solaris and
prototyping new servers and it would be nice to not host them on Windoze. When
I've tried to install on Linux in the past I've always got stuck at
You should be using the Sun Studio uninstaller, which uses the
/var/sadm/install/productregistry file.
http://docs.sun.com/source/819-0487/remove.html
/kso
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I was in the process of removing Sun ONE Studio 10 and I saw this :
The following package is currently
Darren J Moffat wrote on 02/01/06 05:05:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:40, Al Hopper wrote:
Perhaps Name Services could exist as a project, rather than as a community.
My concern, at this time, is the proliferation of OpenSolaris Communities,
and this is why I'm reluctant to form one more.
I
I imagine it's implicit in my being listed as a community lead ;-), but
I do give this a +1.
Just to elaborate a little on the proposal, this community would be the
home for the SVR4 packaging tools code when it's released in the near
future, as well as other packaging and installation
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Jasse Jansson wrote:
When you release a work based on the Program, you may include your own
^^^ ^^^
terms covering added parts for which you have, or can give, appropriate
The SFW consolidation delivers a variety of third-party open source software
to Solaris, such as the Apache HTTP server, Samba, and libusb. This
consolidation
delivers its content into /usr/sfw as an integral part of the Solaris OS, and
should
not be confused with the Freeware Companion CD/DVD.
+1 on reply counter.
tj yang
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Keith M. Wesolowski wrote:
This proposal specifies the creation of a project, SFW Nevada, under which
Great idea, but looking ahead, is not SFW Nevada a limiting title?
Unless Solaris 12's development is also gonna be called Nevada, perhaps
the Nevada bit should be dropped?
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Paul Jakma wrote:
Sigh, important typing mistake:
This conclusion of yours seems to be without merit. Licence transformation
can occur without the copyright holders consent.
^
not
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key
Ubuntu seems to be a cleaned up version of Debian. As pointed out by
Erast, NexentaOS might be an easy port for Google. Users and Google
should not care about the underlying OS, but only about the interface.
Peter
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 12:22 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:48:12PM -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
Great idea, but looking ahead, is not SFW Nevada a limiting title?
Yes, it is, by design. A new project will be created for each
subsequent release. Note that each release is managed by a different
team and may have different goals
... as long as those terms clearly permit all the
activities that this License permits
I am (thankfully) not a lawyer. I don't speak for Sun. YMMV...
Assume I have a software program that consists of some parts that are
mine and other parts that are yours. Furthermore, assume that you
Rich Teer wrote:
Great idea, but looking ahead, is not SFW Nevada a limiting title?
Unless Solaris 12's development is also gonna be called Nevada, perhaps
the Nevada bit should be dropped?
Projects exist until they are incorporated into a community, right? In
other words, the Project is to
* Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-01 13:15]:
I imagine it's implicit in my being listed as a community lead ;-), but
I do give this a +1.
Just to elaborate a little on the proposal, this community would be the
home for the SVR4 packaging tools code when it's released in the near
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, John Plocher wrote:
I am (thankfully) not a lawyer. I don't speak for Sun. YMMV...
Ditto, and ditto.
It also follows that nobody else (other than you) can do so either.
That depends on whether I got you to grant me reciprocal rights to
your work when I granted you
John Plocher wrote:
... as long as those terms clearly permit all the
activities that this License permits
I am (thankfully) not a lawyer. I don't speak for Sun. YMMV...
err... what's wrong with being a lawyer? ;)
imho this thread is now a little off topic
nacho
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 16:59, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 2/1/06, Andrew Pattison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just ot of interest - can you tell me which version of Linux you are
running VMWare on, and how you set it up? I use VMWare for testing Solaris
and prototyping new servers and it would be
This proposed community would provide long-term guidance to teams managing
releases of the SFW consolidation and projects derived from them, and to project
teams working to release and improve the Companion DVD and similar distributions
of third-party open source software for OpenSolaris-based
The SFW consolidation delivers a variety of
third-party open source software
to Solaris,
+1, this needs to be available through OpenSolaris.
liane
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
31 matches
Mail list logo
