Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: If the test suite is going to be running on nv_128 or later, then you are guaranteed to have a zfs filesystem, since root must be zfs then (since the only install method will be IPS, which requires zfs root). Until then you could just

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-16 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: If the test suite is going to be running on nv_128 or later, then you are guaranteed to have a zfs filesystem, since root must be zfs then (since the only install method will be IPS, which requires zfs root). Until

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-16 Thread Darren J Moffat
Joerg Schilling wrote: Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote: If the test suite is going to be running on nv_128 or later, then you are guaranteed to have a zfs filesystem, since root must be zfs then (since the only install method will be IPS, which requires zfs root). Until then

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Roland Mainz
Ian Collins wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Norm Jacobs wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ? I have some vague recollection that

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Ian Collins
Roland Mainz wrote: Ian Collins wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Norm Jacobs wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if yes - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Roland Mainz
Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile 64m /zpool.file

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Ali Bahrami
Roland Mainz wrote: Umpf... the matching code is linked with -Bdirect ... AFAIK I can't interpose library functions linked with this option, right ? You could set LD_NODIRECT to defeat direct bindings --- see ld.so.1(1). However, I agree with the thought that it would be easier to just have a

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Roland Mainz wrote: Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that: # mkfile

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Norm Jacobs
Roland Mainz wrote: Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do

Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] Which kind of ACLs does tmpfssupport?

2009-09-15 Thread Ian Collins
Roland Mainz wrote: Robert Thurlow wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any other options ? By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do