* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060104 14:38]:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
Support for gziped or bzip2ed packages!
It can already download packages over http or
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060104 14:38]:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
Support for gziped or bzip2ed
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the man page:
-d device
Install or copy a package from device. device can be a
full path name to a directory or the identifiers for
tape, floppy disk, or removable disk (for example,
/var/tmp
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:49, Richard Lowe wrote:
You're right though, it doesn't appear to be documented in pkgadd(1M),
or anywhere else I can find.
It is documented as the last sentence of the paragraph describing
the -d option on pkgadd(1m).
Not even in the man pages that come with SX B27
What man pages to you refer to?
The -d option is mentioned twice; see below at OPERANDS where it
specifies the URL.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not even in the man pages that come with SX B27
What man pages to you refer to?
The -d option is mentioned twice; see below at OPERANDS where it
specifies the URL.
So it looks we found a bug in the man page:
The second apperance seems to be a copy of the first
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:49, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the man page:
-d device
Install or copy a package from device. device can be a
full path name to a directory or the identifiers for
tape, floppy
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 10:57, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:49, Richard Lowe wrote:
You're right though, it doesn't appear to be documented in pkgadd(1M),
or anywhere else I can find.
It is documented as the last sentence of
Mike Ditto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or why SVR4 packages are necessarily a part of it.
Well I hope that the proliferation of
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what package-level compatability you are talking about...
Today, *Solaris software distributes in next ways:
1) source tarball
2) binary tarball
3) autoextracting scripts .sh
4) SVR4 packages
5) custom installers
I think it will be
Joerg Schilling writes:
The second apperance seems to be a copy of the first but only the second
one was enhanced.
Yes. I've filed CR 6369177 on this.
Darren J Moffat writes:
Is there an agreement that it would help to include some kind of tsort
capabilities (against pkg dependencies)
On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 14:41 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know what package-level compatability you are talking about...
Today, *Solaris software distributes in next ways:
1) source tarball
2) binary tarball
3) autoextracting scripts .sh
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though...
I'd like to underscore that statement. The concept of OpenSolaris
compliant or OpenSolaris compatible is non-existent. (That's not to say
I think
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In light of all the recent work that's been done to bring Debian PM
(apt) and Debian source repository support to Solaris, what would be the
advantage to using pkgsrc over Debian? (That is, unless you're talking
about having two package registries --
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
It can already download packages over http or https (with support for
proxies specified in the
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the usability.
Which are ?
It can already download packages over http or https (with support for
proxies
BTW: I see a http proxy option but no hint on how to use pkgadd via the
network.
pkgadd -d http://
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:44, Joerg Schilling wrote:
There are more (I curently don't remember the other ones) but the most
important
would be to make pkgadd able to autmatically install a list of packages in
the
right order,
BTW: I see a http proxy option but no hint on how to use
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:49, Richard Lowe wrote:
You're right though, it doesn't appear to be documented in pkgadd(1M),
or anywhere else I can find.
It is documented as the last sentence of the paragraph describing
the -d option on pkgadd(1m).
One other thing, packages (and patches) can also
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The package sources are being actively worked on - the roadmap says
they'll be there this quarter, and we do believe that will be the case.
That's nice to hear.
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or why SVR4 packages are necessarily a part of it.
Well I hope that the proliferation of OpenSolaris-based distros doesn't
create a proliferation
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 17:19 -0800, Mike Ditto wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what an OpenSolaris compliant sticker would be designed
to achieve, though, or why SVR4 packages are necessarily a part of it.
Well I hope that the proliferation of
Erast Benson wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 08:53 +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
The current dpkg repository that is available (Nexenta) is built for
a GNU/Solaris setup and
is not suitable for a Solaris compatible OpenSolaris distro.
that is not true. dpkg and apt-get are highly
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 23:01 +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Erast Benson wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 08:53 +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
The current dpkg repository that is available (Nexenta) is built for
a GNU/Solaris setup and
is not suitable for a Solaris compatible OpenSolaris
pkgsrc on solaris looks very interesting to me, out of all the systems we have
to choose from it seems to hit the sweet spot as far as my limited knowledge of
pm goes...
In light of all the recent work that's been done to bring Debian PM
(apt) and Debian source repository support to
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 08:53 +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
pkgsrc on solaris looks very interesting to me, out of all the
systems we have to choose from it seems to hit the sweet spot as far
as my limited knowledge of pm goes...
In light of all the recent work
Ché Kristo wrote:
so back on topic...
pkgsrc on solaris looks very interesting to me, out of all the systems we have
to choose from it seems to hit the sweet spot as far as my limited knowledge of
pm goes...does anyone here have any sort of extensive experience using pkgsrc
with solaris, if
so back on topic...
pkgsrc on solaris looks very interesting to me, out of all the systems we have
to choose from it seems to hit the sweet spot as far as my limited knowledge of
pm goes...does anyone here have any sort of extensive experience using pkgsrc
with solaris, if so could you please
28 matches
Mail list logo
