[osol-discuss] Re: wifi (was open source process)

2005-07-28 Thread Roy T . Fielding
On Jul 28, 2005, at 10:47 AM, Mike Kupfer wrote: What about things like wifi drivers? I'm not an expert in the area, but I'm told that these drivers often contain a binary-only component (even in Linux). It's apparently the result of US (FCC) regulatory requirements on the wifi hardware.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: wifi (was open source process)

2005-07-28 Thread Shawn Walker
On 7/28/05, Tao Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/28/05, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that's a very practical view. There is a *lot* of hardware out there that cannot be used without some binary component. Not just wifi, but many others. Quite frankly, it

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: wifi (was open source process)

2005-07-28 Thread James C. McPherson
Tao Chen wrote: ... I am not familiar with the Wi-Fi issue. How is it handled by Redhat/SuSe/Debian right now, assuming it's not part of the Linux kernel? ipw2200.sourceforge.net et al have what some people refer to as a HAL (hardware abstraction layer) for the FCC-mandated non-changeable

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: wifi (was open source process)

2005-07-28 Thread Keith M Wesolowski
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:12:55PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote: The point is if a driver exists that can be integrated, but has a required binary only component due to legal or other restrictions and that is the only way that hardware will work, then to me and many others it is perfectly