-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I could spend a lot of time repeating things, but "what Agent said" fits
the bill. The 2 main issues I've been hearing about since the first beta
release have been the side bar and notifications.
The new notification system is just confusing and disor
Robert Martin wrote:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/User:Dzonatas_Sol/Icesphere
> seems to be what website is availible
>
> hint for the developer
> 1 could you please get a website for this and not have your stuff
> scattered across 5 different sites
>
Thank you for the requests. I'll try t
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
wrote:
> It's fairly clear that Linden Lab doesn't have the resources to devote
> to active work on both Snowglobe 1.x and 2.x, and it's not efficient for
> the community as a whole to be splitting effort.
Snowglobe is an opensource pro
Basically, I think the group as a whole likes much of what was done, but
that making the real changes to the UI itself don't exactly seem a
less-than-herculean task. So, if we were to remove the sidebar, will LL
keep it gone? If themability gets added, and people spend the time it
takes to make
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/User:Dzonatas_Sol/Icesphere
seems to be what website is availible
hint for the developer
1 could you please get a website for this and not have your stuff
scattered across 5 different sites
2 a patched build would be a good thing
--
Robert L Martin
_
Link to Icesphere, please?
On May 27, 2010 8:21 PM, "Glen Canaday" wrote:
icesphere looks really interesting... anyone try it? looks like a pain
to get started.
--GC
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.co
icesphere looks really interesting... anyone try it? looks like a pain
to get started.
--GC
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmode
personally..
it has been said before and i completely agree. if i wanted to use a web
browser id open firefox. if i want to use a second life client i want to
see floaters galore.
im not bashing progression... by all means the work that was done on 2.0
is amazing... but for someone who
Hi Oz,
There has been discussion in AWG and other various chat moments of what
could be done. The primary suggestions seems to be able to hide the UI,
but that doesn't mean it needs to be disabled. There is a debug option,
CTRL-ALT-F1, that basically hides the UI, yet the mouse regions are
sti
On 2010-05-27, at 16:50, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> I understand that might leave
> behind things that the Snowglobe user/dev base wants and that some
> people are not happy with some elements of 2.x. What I'd like to know
> is... what needs to happen to make that choice that most people
I think the multitude of polls on the subject makes it clear that many,
many people just hate the UI but would be perfectly fine back-porting
some of the features (web-on-a-prim, tattoos, etc) to 1.x.
In fact, when I last used 2.0, I got what we epileptics call an "aura",
which is a warning sign
I opened this in the 27 May IW open source meeting, and would like to
invite wider and more specific feedback.
It's fairly clear that Linden Lab doesn't have the resources to devote
to active work on both Snowglobe 1.x and 2.x, and it's not efficient for
the community as a whole to be splitting
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Coding_standard
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Nicky Perian wrote:
> Can someone point me to a code style guide. I saw it sometime back but, I
> have searched and been unable to find.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe info
13 matches
Mail list logo
