On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Argent Stonecutter
wrote:
> On 2010-09-29, at 18:06, Kelly Linden wrote:
> > * In the end the number of scripts shouldn't be important. I have lofty
> desires to remove the arbitrary limit on script size so that we can stop the
> silly games of splitting scripts apa
On 2010-09-29, at 18:06, Kelly Linden wrote:
> * In the end the number of scripts shouldn't be important. I have lofty
> desires to remove the arbitrary limit on script size so that we can stop the
> silly games of splitting scripts apart because you need 10k more memory than
> the default. On t
On 10/02/2010 09:57 PM, miss c wrote:
> I saw the memoryprofiling debug option to enable the TCMalloc's memory
> profiling. Reading up on it here
> http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/tcmalloc.html
I guess you're talking about the "MemProfiling" debug setting? (When
talking about less well
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 10:43 +0200, Zi Ree wrote:
> Unless we get *proper* metrics on cpu time and memory consumption, all this
> talk about script conut and memory is utterly useless and will only confuse
> people and lead to drama.
One approach is to use a cost-per-LSLcall function to generate
I saw the memoryprofiling debug option to enable the TCMalloc's memory
profiling. Reading up on it here
http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/tcmalloc.html
Will this enhance the performance of my viewer or is this legacy? If it will
enhance it, why is this option not on by default? Can s
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, miss c wrote:
> THANK YOU, what he said. Why lie and make up some weird inaccurate number
> to leave people guessing, just give us a script counter, LOL.
>
what i would suggest is
1 have a way to see TOTAL scripts LSL scripts and Mono scripts
2 if any ARC type num
Shortened quick links:
http://bit.ly/viewer-dev-latest-Linux
http://bit.ly/viewer-dev-latest-Mac
http://bit.ly/viewer-dev-latest-Windows
All results:
http://bit.ly/viewer-dev-latest
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:59 PM, CG Linden wrote:
> The links are now active.
> --
> cg
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2
THANK YOU, what he said. Why lie and make up some weird inaccurate number to
leave people guessing, just give us a script counter, LOL.
From: Erik Anderson
To: Bryon Ruxton
Cc: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 9:05:41 PM
Subject
Am Samstag 02 Oktober 2010 schrieb Ponzu:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Zi Ree wrote:
> > Am Samstag 02 Oktober 2010 03:19:13 schrieb Bryon Ruxton:
> >
> > Unless we get *proper* metrics on cpu time and memory
> > consumption, all this talk about script conut and memory is
> > utterly useless
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Zi Ree wrote:
> Am Samstag 02 Oktober 2010 03:19:13 schrieb Bryon Ruxton:
>
> Unless we get *proper* metrics on cpu time and memory consumption, all this
> talk about script conut and memory is utterly useless and will only confuse
> people and lead to drama.
>
>
T
Am Samstag 02 Oktober 2010 03:19:13 schrieb Bryon Ruxton:
> Q, in this case, I disagree. Changing the SCRIPT_MEMORY reports later will
> not technically break content, it would just requires to slightly alter the
> interpretation of it. Modifying the cap variables for event(s) to lower
You never
11 matches
Mail list logo
