2.0 doesn't run on my machine, until it does, I couldn't work on it
even if I desired to. Other people are in the same position.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Aleric Inglewood
wrote:
> Hi Oz,
>
> I already communicated this clearly to merov, but I'll summarize it here:
>
> As you can see fr
Hi Oz,
I already communicated this clearly to merov, but I'll summarize it here:
As you can see from
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AgvC7hm5YZqcdHVXb05iTE0wTFc0bWptTW4tOTZuS3c&hl=en&ui=2#gid=0
all my patches larger than one line, being
VWR-14914 (SNOW-673)
SNOW-84 (SNOW-546),
SNOW-103
> On Friday 28 May 2010 00:50:55 Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> > Please respond to this thread with your favorite reasons not to move
> > development to 2.x. We will review the list at the 6 June open source
> > meeting with the goal of setting some priorities.
Oz, I think open source de
Am Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010, 23:50:55 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> It's fairly clear that Linden Lab doesn't have the resources to devote
> to active work on both Snowglobe 1.x and 2.x, and it's not efficient for
> the community as a whole to be splitting effort.
Like many others so far
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I could spend a lot of time repeating things, but "what Agent said" fits
the bill. The 2 main issues I've been hearing about since the first beta
release have been the side bar and notifications.
The new notification system is just confusing and disor
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
wrote:
> It's fairly clear that Linden Lab doesn't have the resources to devote
> to active work on both Snowglobe 1.x and 2.x, and it's not efficient for
> the community as a whole to be splitting effort.
Snowglobe is an opensource pro
Basically, I think the group as a whole likes much of what was done, but
that making the real changes to the UI itself don't exactly seem a
less-than-herculean task. So, if we were to remove the sidebar, will LL
keep it gone? If themability gets added, and people spend the time it
takes to make
personally..
it has been said before and i completely agree. if i wanted to use a web
browser id open firefox. if i want to use a second life client i want to
see floaters galore.
im not bashing progression... by all means the work that was done on 2.0
is amazing... but for someone who
Hi Oz,
There has been discussion in AWG and other various chat moments of what
could be done. The primary suggestions seems to be able to hide the UI,
but that doesn't mean it needs to be disabled. There is a debug option,
CTRL-ALT-F1, that basically hides the UI, yet the mouse regions are
sti
On 2010-05-27, at 16:50, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> I understand that might leave
> behind things that the Snowglobe user/dev base wants and that some
> people are not happy with some elements of 2.x. What I'd like to know
> is... what needs to happen to make that choice that most people
I think the multitude of polls on the subject makes it clear that many,
many people just hate the UI but would be perfectly fine back-porting
some of the features (web-on-a-prim, tattoos, etc) to 1.x.
In fact, when I last used 2.0, I got what we epileptics call an "aura",
which is a warning sign
I opened this in the 27 May IW open source meeting, and would like to
invite wider and more specific feedback.
It's fairly clear that Linden Lab doesn't have the resources to devote
to active work on both Snowglobe 1.x and 2.x, and it's not efficient for
the community as a whole to be splitting
12 matches
Mail list logo
