Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

ive-C On Sep 4, 2010, at 2:02 PM, Nicky Fullton wrote: > >> From: Patnad Babii >> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture >> To: "OpenSource Mailing List" >> Date: Saturday, September 4, 2010, 8:37 PM >> most of the games run only in

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

...@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 6:52 PM To: Ann Otoole; Brendan Wilson; OpenSource Mailing List Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Ann, At one point I thought that just skipping 2008 all together would be the way forward since LL doesn't seem inclined to

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

from 2005? From: Nicky Perian To: Ann Otoole ; Brendan Wilson ; OpenSource Mailing List Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 1:14:14 PM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Libraries, Libraries, Libraries and MS redistribution

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

> From: Patnad Babii > Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture > To: "OpenSource Mailing List" > Date: Saturday, September 4, 2010, 8:37 PM > most of the games run only in windows > anyways, its 80% of their userbase at > the least. > >

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Patnad Babii wrote: > most of the games run only in windows anyways, its 80% of their userbase at > the least. > > Also its not true they can't run on mac and linux as theres mono now that > make it possible. > > > C# would be too slow. It is true that Mono would

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

OpenSource Mailing List Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture On 2010-09-04, at 14:23, Patnad Babii wrote: > Switch to C# and everything become easier to deploy and use TFS for QA > and saving sources. If you don't mind a 2-5x performance hit on Windows and an elim

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On 2010-09-04, at 14:23, Patnad Babii wrote: > Switch to C# and everything become easier to deploy and use TFS for QA > and saving sources. If you don't mind a 2-5x performance hit on Windows and an elimination of the Linux and Mac clients. ___ Pol

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Switch to C# and everything become easier to deploy and use TFS for QA and saving sources. From: Ann Otoole Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 3:19 PM To: Nicky Perian ; Brendan Wilson ; OpenSource Mailing List Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture you mean like the

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

? From: Nicky Perian To: Ann Otoole ; Brendan Wilson ; OpenSource Mailing List Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 1:14:14 PM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Libraries, Libraries, Libraries and MS redistribution hell. From

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 17:39 +0100, Talia Tokugawa wrote: > Okay so this plugin talk has got me thinking.. I tend to think > visually and wasn't sure on if this mailing list dealt with images or > not so I just blogged the idea instead. > http://www.talia-tokugawa.co.uk/snowstorm-plugin-concepts-cal

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Libraries, Libraries, Libraries and MS redistribution hell. From: Ann Otoole To: Brendan Wilson ; OpenSource Mailing List Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 12:10:12 PM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Why would anyone be burning time on

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Why would anyone be burning time on VS2008 when VS2010 is the current environment? From: Brendan Wilson To: OpenSource Mailing List Sent: Sat, September 4, 2010 9:00:33 AM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Not yet they have just

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Okay so this plugin talk has got me thinking.. I tend to think visually and wasn't sure on if this mailing list dealt with images or not so I just blogged the idea instead. http://www.talia-tokugawa.co.uk/snowstorm-plugin-concepts-calendar/

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 13:28 +0100, Talia Tokugawa wrote: > Well this is taking things quite a bit further than I envisioned for > this. What Glen is suggesting here seems more like having stuff like > java and flash installed for a browser. Actually, nowhere near that! That's what people on the li

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Of Ann Otoole Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:11 AM To: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence); opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture Has this project code been brought forward to Visual Studio 2010? _ From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Well this is taking things quite a bit further than I envisioned for this. What Glen is suggesting here seems more like having stuff like java and flash installed for a browser. Where I was going with this was mainly just with the UI. The UI system code be further cut into pieces which was where I

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

> > this is why now all code is public and following few step you can > contribute all code you want... a optional switchable theme/UI/XUI can > be merged giving to all residents the freedom to choose the aspect on > monitor (viewer 1.x style too). > > Is hard take LL base code, patch it, merge

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:40:05 -0400 Glen Canaday wrote: > > Like I said... 50 times, never got further than the first sentence. > Too much work and not enough single geek. I had even named it "GROND" > after Sauron's battering ram. this is why now all code is public and following few step you ca

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

This is the project I've started 50 times and never got further than "YES! It compiles on all platforms! ...just.. need... everything. else." Since it's LGPL now, we can make a modular plugin-based viewer that uses LL's code as a starting point, and even incorporate BSD-licensed bits... just conve

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On 2010-09-03 11:17, Brandon Husbands wrote: > What id like to see is the viewer be distributed as a library. And we > can init our own project with can create the window etc and setup the > ui.. Since you went lgpl you should have a compile option for a lib > with a established interface. Ot

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

This. On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Ann Otoole wrote: > Has this project code been brought forward to Visual Studio 2010? > > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the po

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

AM, Ann Otoole wrote: > Has this project code been brought forward to Visual Studio 2010? > > -- > *From:* Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) > *To:* opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com > *Sent:* Fri, September 3, 2010 9:32:54 AM > *Subject:* Re: [op

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Has this project code been brought forward to Visual Studio 2010? From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Sent: Fri, September 3, 2010 9:32:54 AM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture On 2010-09-03 9:14

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On 2010-09-03 9:14, Lawson English wrote: >On 9/2/10 8:13 AM, Talia Tokugawa wrote: >> [...] >> I know this has been suggested before as friends have suggested it. >> Why not make the viewer more Modular? Introduce a plugin architecture. >> Allow any user to "build" their own client that fits

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

On 9/2/10 8:13 AM, Talia Tokugawa wrote: > [...] > I know this has been suggested before as friends have suggested it. > Why not make the viewer more Modular? Introduce a plugin architecture. > Allow any user to "build" their own client that fits their needs and > requirements. > Its a HUGE u

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

That's an excellent suggestion, Talia. +1 We actually started the process of discussing possible architectures for modular viewer extension through plugins and client-side scripting back in February and March. A few non-technical hurdles blocked our progress at that time, but I believe that the s

Re: [opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Every emerald developer if free to join project viewer trunk and toss patches (and not only developers from emerald) -- Sent by iPhone Il giorno 02/set/2010, alle ore 17:13, Talia Tokugawa ha scritto: > Hi, first post on this mailing list. > So I wake up this morning and I Login to SL using Sn

[opensource-dev] Plugins/Modular architecture

Hi, first post on this mailing list. So I wake up this morning and I Login to SL using Snowstorm and I am instantly annoyed it's not Emerald. I got to thinking on the subject of viewers, secondlife and the general usage thereof. There are many different user types, new residents, power users, linde