Re: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds (was: Remaining build issues for 64bit linux standalone out-of-source (without unit tests))

2010-10-12 Thread WolfPup Lowenhar
On the subject of the reason for killing test here is another reason that I have attached this is from a full build I did today. The error listed in the file is actually coded around and in visual studio you have to set that test to not treat warnings as errors so that it will not fail! From: o

Re: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds

2010-10-11 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 10/12/2010 12:21 AM, CG Linden wrote: > Yay \o/ for "daggifying" :) Done: http://bitbucket.org/boroondas/vwr-23385 Ready for review. Cheers, Boroondas ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSour

Re: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds (was: Remaining build issues for 64bit linux standalone out-of-source (without unit tests))

2010-10-11 Thread CG Linden
Yay \o/ for "daggifying" :) -- cg On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > On 10/11/2010 10:12 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > > In fact, my plan for the time after having gotten all build fixes I need > with LL_TESTS set to FALSE into viewer-development (which I hope will be > so