On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:02:24 +0200, Marine Kelley wrote:
Hi, I'd like to thank whoever changed the application page on the Viewer
Directory, the RL info fields used to be publishable (they had a little
cross next to the little star indicating that they were mandatory), and
that's what was
This is not a choice I made lightly, but many people simply did not
understand why the RLV was not in the directory, and despite the number of
times I said it was compliant, people just can't get their heads around the
fact that TPV policy compliance and Viewer Directory listing are two totally
At 12:40 PM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:02:24 +0200, Marine Kelley wrote:
Hi, I'd like to thank whoever changed the application page on the Viewer
Directory, the RL info fields used to be publishable (they had a little
cross next to the little star indicating that they were
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:34:29 +0200, Marine Kelley wrote:
This is not a choice I made lightly, but many people simply did not
understand why the RLV was not in the directory, and despite the number of
times I said it was compliant, people just can't get their heads around the
fact that TPV
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:50:11 -0600, Andromeda Quonset wrote:
That aside, I investigated the application form for the 3rd party viewer.
It does ask for my real name, but has that already filled-out for me,
and is marked as something they won't publish. It asks for age
verification, which
hi there people ive recently made some changes to my skin to use in viewr
2.0 and in that process i find a confing that gives me the option of show or
not show invetory trash icon
at the time i select not show but now i want to revert that unfortunatly for
me i cant find that config again ive
Henri,
So, registering to the directory is clearly not a requirement to be
considered
as TPV-policy compliant, but on the other hand LL suggests that
the viewers
which are not in the directory are dangerous ones...
This is both unfair and
very close to pure diffamation.
The viewer is required to
Brad,
The past week I having been fighting a cmake issue in that I can't seem to
build w/o referencing VC80 boost libraries at secondlife.exe link. Also,
falling back to VC80 to check for changes that affect the basic build and back
requires reverting 3 local plus 2 contributed patches and
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Henri Beauchamp sl...@free.fr wrote:
In fact, it probably comes from the fact that Linden Lab uses contradictory
phrases in the TPV policy and in the TPV directory.
Quoting the former:
Unlike the other sections of this Policy, participation in the Viewer
On 29/04/2010 1:43 PM, Latif Khalifa wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Henri Beauchamp sl...@free.fr wrote:
In fact, it probably comes from the fact that Linden Lab uses contradictory
phrases in the TPV policy and in the TPV directory.
Quoting the former:
Unlike the other
10 matches
Mail list logo
