https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629
--- Comment #12 from Bill Wendling ---
(In reply to David Bohman from comment #11)
> Thank you for the detailed note, I am reading the article now. It is
> about what I expected. Unfortunately, the llvm / clang folks were
> not able to reproduce
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3635
--- Comment #2 from quirin ---
Just tried the supplied patch. Works like a charm.
Is the -P option going to be incorporated in one of the next releases?
Further do I now see the difficulty of requesting the flags. I didn't
had these different
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629
--- Comment #11 from David Bohman ---
Thank you for the detailed note, I am reading the article now. It is
about what I expected. Unfortunately, the llvm / clang folks were not
able to reproduce the problem with this flag on Linux.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629
--- Comment #10 from Darren Tucker ---
(In reply to David Bohman from comment #9)
> I cherry-picked 2a19e02 ff220d4 99a2df5 on top of V_9_5_P1, and it
> does build successfully on my system.
Thanks, good to hear!
> Are there security
