https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Maynard ---
(In reply to Damien Miller from comment #7)
> If you were relying on an accidental, unreliable and undocumented
> behaviour for security then you always destined to have a bad time.
The behavior was
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
--- Comment #7 from Damien Miller ---
If you were relying on an accidental, unreliable and undocumented
behaviour for security then you always destined to have a bad time.
ClientAliveCountMax=0 *never* worked as a reliable inactivity timeout -
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
Christopher Maynard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christopher.mayn...@igt.com
---
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
James Dingwall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.dingw...@ncr.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Damien Miller
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3079
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
Darren Tucker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3301|ok?(dtuc...@dtucker.net)|ok+
Flags|
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2627
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@mindrot.org,
|
