https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #3641||ok?(dtuc...@dtucker.net)
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
--- Comment #5 from Damien Miller ---
Created attachment 3641
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3641=edit
another version, logging via monitor
Here'e another version, it's a bit more complex but it preserves
logging via the
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@mindrot.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
--- Comment #3 from Darren Tucker ---
(In reply to Colin Watson from comment #2)
> (In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #1)
> > [...]security vulnerabilities
>
> I don't think this is _not_ an issue, and I agree it requires care -
> that's
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
--- Comment #2 from Colin Watson ---
(In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #1)
> Arbitrarily failing syscalls that do not normally fail has been the
> source of serious security vulnerabilities in the past (eg
> CVE-2000-0506). That's why the
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3478
Darren Tucker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtuc...@dtucker.net
--- Comment #1 from
